Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-01-2011 @ 8:12PM
Daynthebold said...
It's more of the same fury development yo-yo we've been saddled with since the beginning of Wrath. Remember how many changes they made to Titan's Grip before finally settling on its current incarnation.
Reply
3-01-2011 @ 8:34PM
Pyromelter said...
What I find interesting is that blizzard seems to be forever tweaking with warriors, but for the most part they end up in good spots - competitive pve damage, good in tanking for all situations, and viable in pvp.
3-02-2011 @ 12:19AM
niko said...
That's because Blizzard fears Rossi. :)
3-02-2011 @ 12:56AM
Natsumi said...
That's the way it SHOULD be. Warriors SHOULD be viable in PvP and PvE, not just one or the other. What they are trying to do is stop the 2 minute instajib that is Fury PvP while not crushing Fury's PvE DPS. As far as PvP goes I think WoW (and just about every other MMO out there) are completely broken. I'm looking forward to Diablo 3's PvP game where the PvE portion of the spell/skill has absolutely ZERO impact on the PvP portion. It's looking to be a very balanced system and I think it MAY replace Arena as the E-Sport of choice for small teams. Who knows, if it works out WoW (or at least "Titan") may integrate it in the future.