Skip to Content
3-01-2011 @ 8:12PM
It's more of the same fury development yo-yo we've been saddled with since the beginning of Wrath. Remember how many changes they made to Titan's Grip before finally settling on its current incarnation.
3-01-2011 @ 8:34PM
What I find interesting is that blizzard seems to be forever tweaking with warriors, but for the most part they end up in good spots - competitive pve damage, good in tanking for all situations, and viable in pvp.
3-02-2011 @ 12:19AM
That's because Blizzard fears Rossi. :)
3-02-2011 @ 12:56AM
That's the way it SHOULD be. Warriors SHOULD be viable in PvP and PvE, not just one or the other. What they are trying to do is stop the 2 minute instajib that is Fury PvP while not crushing Fury's PvE DPS. As far as PvP goes I think WoW (and just about every other MMO out there) are completely broken. I'm looking forward to Diablo 3's PvP game where the PvE portion of the spell/skill has absolutely ZERO impact on the PvP portion. It's looking to be a very balanced system and I think it MAY replace Arena as the E-Sport of choice for small teams. Who knows, if it works out WoW (or at least "Titan") may integrate it in the future.
First time? A confirmation email will be sent to you after submitting.
Members enter your username and password.
Enter your AOL or AIM screenname and password.
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.