Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-05-2011 @ 2:01PM
Jehosaphat said...
I think a system that only paired you with people you rated well (and vice versa) would work out, as long as there was some sort of extension. That is, person A and person B rate each other well, person B and person C rate each other well, so A and C could be matched up even if B wasn't online. That way, the impatient folks get queued with other impatient folks, etc.
The main issue would be the initial seeding, but I see no reason why it would have ot be an immediate switch