Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-10-2011 @ 3:41PM
Brock said...
If by " precious state of hunter balance" you mean "MM is the only viable choice with SV being the lowest dps spec of any class" then yes, that's correct. I hope they unnerf SV soon and admit they were wrong. I hate MM.
Reply
3-10-2011 @ 3:47PM
Elvgren said...
The distance between specs has never, ever, been less than it is now and, you could argue, depending on the skill of the player, every spec is capable of "top dps" in any given encounter.
Be careful what you wish for in asking for adjustments.
3-10-2011 @ 4:02PM
Deathknighty said...
Well, seeing as you as an individual hate MM for no, or only the most arbitrary of reasons, Blizz had better nerf it then, huh?
3-10-2011 @ 6:04PM
Brock said...
@ Deathknighty Who said anything about nerfing MM? I want SV unnerfed. Learn to read.
I don't like that SV is 4k behind MM. MM is higher than SV was before it was nerfed. Doesn't make sense to me. It makes it seem like Blizz is forcing MM upon hunters.
http://www.simulationcraft.org/410/Raid_T11_372.html
3-11-2011 @ 12:53AM
Dreyja said...
The numbers are ALL so close and change so much depending on the type of fight, honestly I don't think anyone HAS to play MM unless their group needs that .2% over the whole fight.
Sure you could argue the numbers from simulators but the actual fights are completely different.
3-11-2011 @ 1:48AM
Brock said...
Getting downrated because I said I hate MM, and every hunter seems to love it. Why is it so much to ask that they undo their mistake in nerfing SV? What does that have to do with MM? SV will fall into obsolescence next tier because it doesn't scale well. I want my spec viable.
3-11-2011 @ 3:27PM
Elvgren said...
I don't particularly like MM. Too PvP centric for my tastes. I liked it better than SV in LK. It's changed. They've ALL changed.
I'm running BM and SV and switch for the best spec for the fight. It's not the same "one best spec" boring world any more. I PREFER BM. I ACCEPT it can't always be the best for a given encounter. I ADJUST for the good of the raid.
To say SV isn't viable is pretty far off the mark, as in not even within sight of the mark. To not admit SV was out of scale there for a while is pretty far off the mark. As Frost says SV IS the most forgiving spec right now. To understand what "not viable" means you'd need to have been around for the great BM nerf in LK.
I don't always agree with Frost but he is spot on saying any of the curent specs are completely viable and in the best shape relative to each other they have ever been, especially in terms of contributing to the raid as a whole.