Totem Talk: Wibbly-wobbly timey-wimey stuff vs. mastery

I have proof that The Master is an elemental shaman! This is going to keep me happy for weeks -- or at least until the premiere of the next series of Doctor Who. This week, I'd like to touch upon a long-standing pet peeve of mine involving that wibbly-wobbly timey-wimey stuff we call haste, and also have a poke at The Ma -- I mean, at mastery.
This goes back to the days when I was brand new to blogging and trying to gear up my own shaman for the first time. As I built up my store of knowledge, I frequently came across a specified amount of haste that was viewed almost like a haste cap. Get that amount of haste, and you didn't need any more? Madness. As the elemental tree was changed and tinkered with, this fixed number became less and less relevant. Based as it was in the idea of a fixed rotation and fitting in an extra Lightning Bolt between every Lava Burst, this fixed number wasn't as applicable in a live raid situation, where human error, RNG, and lag all combined to create an imperfect environment for a perfect rotation.
Cataclysm delivered mastery into the mix. Thus began the eternal question: When is mastery better than haste? This question is couched in a misunderstanding of the way haste and mastery interact and in the practice of stacking whichever is the best perceived stat.
The idea of a haste "goal" has enjoyed an irritating persistence, thanks to higher-end Wrath raiders' reaching the soft haste cap for Lightning Bolt and bringing the cast time below the global cooldown. Even after that break point, at the time there was still a lot of value in the haste stat, as it still affected Lightning Bolt for the rest of the fight and Lava Burst all the time.
Haste thresholds and DoTs
In Cataclysm, haste thresholds (also known as break points) are a hot topic for classes that rely on a lot of HoTs or DoTs. The new HoT/DoT haste mechanic reduces the time between ticks, rather than overall spell duration. Haste thresholds are where enough haste is gained to fit an extra tick into the duration. This idea has been picked up and asked about in the elemental community as well.
For a healer in these mana-strapped times, an extra tick increases efficiency and heals per cast. For a DPS class (DoT-heavy classes aside), this threshold has less value in a live raid environment. As elemental shaman have only one DoT and our other spells continue to benefit from haste even after the soft haste cap, there is no break point beyond which we get to stop thinking about haste due to DoT mechanics. In other words, such haste thresholds are little more than a nice number to let you know that your gear is heading in roughly the right direction.
Haste vs. mastery
In the past, elemental shaman have been in the position of stacking haste and spellpower, doing very little else. This gearing tactic is now problematic due to the increasing value of mastery. The big question of when to stop stacking haste and start picking up mastery tends to focus on the idea of some sort of threshold. The difficulty with stat stacking -- and the reason I have never advocated stacking haste to the exclusion of mastery in the past -- is that haste and mastery scale in a synergistic fashion. If you have a poke around with any sim or spreadsheet and slowly increase the amounts of both stats, it is possible to see the stat weightings/values playing leap-frog with each other.
The root of this synergy is that both stats increase the total amount of Rolling Thunder procs within a given period. Haste does this by decreasing cast time, resulting in more Lightning Bolts cast. Mastery does this by increasing the proc chance per cast. Haste basically creates more opportunities for mastery to get a look-in during a given fight, as well as its basic DPS increase via the reduction of cast times. As a result, both stats result in Lightning Shield's stacking faster. If you have high amounts of both stats? That's a very tasty situation for an elemental shaman, especially if the actual spells pack a hefty punch due to high intellect levels.
Don't take stat rankings at face value
A lot of confusion is created by taking specific stat weights, as generated by sims and spreadsheets, as somewhat static statements of value. This is compounded when a particular set of stat weights is then used with Wowhead filters to choose an upgrade. What works out as the biggest upgrade for one set of gear might actually rank lower for another set of gear. Your 359 raid gear is not the same as my 346 heroic gear. A good best-in-slot list is actually a "best gear compilation," as SimulationCraft and RAWR output a set that creates the best simulated DPS, rather than a list of items compared by stat weight.
Lab conditions vs. field tests
Finally, whenever you sim or spreadsheet a gear set, remember that it is not a perfect model of what really happens when you personally go up against a particular boss. Certain glyphs and stats increase or decrease in value depending on the nature of the fight and your personal ability to maximize DPS.
As far as movement goes, we benefit from mastery due to Rolling Thunder procs, resulting in a higher chance of having a 7+ stack Lightning Shield available while moving. Haste benefits us during movement due to Flame Shock and any time we are casting using Spiritwalker's Grace. Otherwise, intellect is the main boost during movement. For AoE, haste benefits our Chain Lightning, Flame Shock, and Earthquake. Mastery only really assists via Rolling Thunder procs from Chain Lightning, although this matters more once patch 4.1 goes live. ... All things to keep in mind.
How to pick an upgrade
So which piece of gear to chose, and how to reforge it? The min-maxing choice that our enhancement shaman kin have been familiar for a while is to sim everything to see if increased DPS is a result after adding it to your current gear. For many players, the intricacy of the gear puzzle is fun. For others, it is just tiresome. The practical choice for a player who is not interested in simming every piece of gear is to balance mastery and haste. For most players, it isn't possible to get equal percentages of mastery and haste, but just don't be afraid of replacing a haste item with a mastery-based upgrade (e.g. haste/spirit to mastery/haste, with more intellect on the mastery piece).
In a production environment, haste is the choice for a lot of players because it is always a consistent increase to DPS. One reason I'm a personal fan of haste is the tangible impact it has on playing almost immediately. At the same time, don't discount the impact mastery can have. With more mastery, there will come a greater need to juggle shock cooldowns, which is perhaps more fun than casting more Lightning Bolts. Push two buttons more often, or push the new Earth Shock button more often? While Fulmination is a small portion of our damage, more mastery also means more DPS choices in movement-heavy fights. Thus when it comes to a matter of gemming and reforging, there is now a choice beyond ye olde stack haste.
Personally, I like fast cast times, so I stick to the method of using Reckless gems in yellow sockets and reforging crit to haste -- but on the flip side, I am much happier to grab mastery upgrades than I was at the start of Cataclysm. I think Blizzard is doing a good job of making the stat puzzle interesting, while still maintaining a level of obviousness and simplicity for those less interested in the perfect gear set.
Filed under: Shaman, (Shaman) Totem Talk






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
Voodie Mar 10th 2011 9:09PM
I don't have a shaman but I
Voodie Mar 10th 2011 9:11PM
Ok, it cut out half my message...
Don't have a Shaman but I
Voodie Mar 10th 2011 9:12PM
Ok, seems it won't post past the "less than three"... Let's try one more time...
Don't have a Shaman but I love you for the Doctor Who reference. By the way, for those who haven't heard: The new season starts on April 23ed on BBC America.
Yomamma Mar 10th 2011 9:25PM
I had to upvote all 3 of your posts..just cause it made me laugh watching all 3 post lol :)
Kravos Mar 10th 2011 9:44PM
Yo Voodie, Imma let you finish, but I
Eregos ftw! Mar 10th 2011 9:51PM
I know! I'm so excited! and I REALLY hope Matt Smith quits after it... He just isn't Doctor material!
(P.S. I love how the article is about Mastery, and the picture is of the Master... Whom I love! :P)
Artificial Mar 10th 2011 10:01PM
@Eregos: You should really quit watching. You just aren't Doctor Who fan material...
icepyro Mar 10th 2011 10:02PM
[hands Voodie a couple of '<3's]
There ya go bud. For the next time you someone references Doctor Who (which on this site is inevitable).
(btw, comments can't have <s typed as such, but you can type < and it converts for you)
Voodie Mar 10th 2011 10:07PM
Thanks for the up votes. I suppose it's good to know that my embarrassing moment is, at the very least, amusing! ^.~
@Eregos ftw! - Really? I adore him. Not as much as David, but I think Matt's done a brilliant job making the role his own. I don't think even Tom Baker could have followed up David Tennet and made people happy. Not to mention Amy Pond is the hotness and Rory is the man. (who waited.) Plus, everyone knows bow ties are cool.
Eregos ftw! Mar 10th 2011 10:13PM
I knew posting that I didn't like the Eleventh Doctor would get me rage! I don't know, he just seems... unimpressive to me. The other doctors (Eccleston and Tennent especially) had a fantastic aura of 'I-know-everything-and-I'm-brilliant!'. Matt just... doesn't.
Hugo C Mar 10th 2011 11:09PM
@Eregos
Matt Smith is better than David Tennant (This is war)
thedoctor2031 Mar 10th 2011 11:54PM
Also don't have a shaman but kinda had to comment on the Doctor Who pic. Various reasons why the Master is definitely an Elemental Shammy though while we are on the subject: He can cast chain lightning. He makes use of reincarnation. He struck fear into the hearts of the alliance (before Burning Crusade).
jorge_av Mar 11th 2011 1:52AM
@Hugo
Well, looks like you have someone else to go to war with. I've got nothing against Matt Smith, but it's going to take a few decades to find a better Doctor than David Tennant. (After the writers figure out how to get past the 12 regenerations bit--again going back to The Master. Hehe.)
Sarah Nichol Mar 11th 2011 2:17AM
@jorge I believe they're going to ignore that bit of canon entirely, sadly enough.
I'm liking Matt Smith, just for different reasons. I also like Tennant and Eccleston. When I think of the Doctor my brain generally goes to Tom Baker (I want a Doctor Who scarf....) so I'm a little all over the place.
And so far, Amy Pond is definitely not better than Donna.
THE WICKER MAN (BWF) (GT: Dalek Prime) Mar 11th 2011 2:58AM
Matt Smith is one of the best Doctors! DO NOT BLASPHEME! EX TER MIN ATE! (Matt Smiths are cool!)
jorge_av Mar 11th 2011 4:15AM
@Sarah
Thank you! I loved Donna! She brought that little bit of comedy to compliment The Doctor's. Did you catch the Doctor Who sketch she did with David on Comic Relief? Hilarious!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxB1gB6K-2A
And also, despite what many people say, I liked Martha. Particularly after she joined UNIT and was on Torchwood.
Sarah Nichol Mar 11th 2011 4:40AM
@Jorge
I actually didn't get into new Who until the Catherine Tate era. I watched because I thought she would be AWFUL, and some how she got me hooked. Then I went back and watched Eccleston Era through to the end of season 4 and have been watching ever since. End of series 4 has me in floods of tears every damn time. Donna is ridiculously awesome.
I do love Matt Smith and I enjoy Karen's work, but they're both still lacking the gravitas of the older actors. However Matt is definitely inhabiting the role, in a very Tom Baker style and I think he is only going to get better. He is maybe also let down a little bit by the ...fairytale emphasis of S Moffat, the current show runner who is a brilliant writer but a little bit inconsistent for a whole series.
Ad134 Mar 11th 2011 5:42AM
@Sarah
Matt is a fine doctor, and Karen is very much capable of acting. It's the writing that disappointed me during the last series. When Moffat took over, I was expecting the best series we had ever had. What we got was the worst. Hopefully he learned from his mistakes because - as we all know - he has the capacity for amazing things (Blink, The Empty Child, etc).
#11 never really had a personality, except in that one Sarah Jane Adventures episode. Everyone other than Smith is awful in it, so I don't recommend unless you want to see how he can own the character. In that one SJA episode, he had more character than he did for the entire 5th series.
Andrew Mar 11th 2011 5:44AM
The brilliant thing about Donna that neither Martha NOR ROSE had is that her story arch made oh so painfully plain just how far she had developed during her tenure as assistant. Both Rose's and Martha's stories were colored by their falling in love with the Doctor, so that became the brunt of their characters' development. Donna never fell in love with the Doctor, though she became attached to him in other ways. But it honestly wasn't until her swan song episode and the specials that came after it that you realized just how brilliantly Catherine Tate pulled off that role and how especially tragic her story was.
lilywillylover Mar 11th 2011 7:35AM
@Ruth
Then you must be a sheltered or an in-denial bigot. Name me one group that's as universally hated and reviled by multiple religious and ethnic groups than homosexuals.
In the U.S. over 50% of the population doesn't believe that homosexuals should have equal rights. In the Middle East, most Middle Eastern countries, being gay is punishable by death. It's much maligned in Africa and a huge portion of Asia.
Even in Europe, there's still pockets of homophobia.
So it's not hyperbole when the majority of the world DOES think you're dirt. So before you open your mouth about being "logical" maybe do some research first?