Skip to Content
3-11-2011 @ 4:27PM
I wish they had chosen #1. I think they want to do that. They keep indicating that they'd like us to be able to making meaningful choices with our trees (though the EJ analysis will, of course, result in a "best" build).The problem with #2 (the other problem, that is) is that it's never "oh, I have 10 talent points play with". It's "well, I guess I need to put a couple of points in this tier to get to the next one" a few times and then you have, maybe, 2-4 points to play with at the end.Druids might not be the best example because we have no real choice for our secondary tree. If you don't pvp, you're either Balance/Resto, Resto/Balance, or Feral/Resto due to talent synergies. I'd almost rather they shrink the trees some more and make Feral/Balance or Balance/Feral an interesting choice because of added utility.TL;DR: Blizz really needs to come up with some more interesting choices.
First time? A confirmation email will be sent to you after submitting.
Members enter your username and password.
Enter your AOL or AIM screenname and password.
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.