Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-18-2011 @ 10:04AM
Shade said...
Re: Xbox being 'cooler'
1) The time commitment of the community aspect is significantly shorter. You can get through a few ladder matches in any FPS in the time that it takes to queue and run a successful heroic these days.
2) A real life aspect is more common. Far easier to bring a few extra controllers to a friend's house than for the same number of people to lug their rigs over and start a LAN, especially considering what'll happen to the lag.
3) The popular online Xbox options (CoD and Halo were cited) cater to the impulses of the "cool" market. A high school's football team is probably going to get more enjoyment out of chaining headshots from their mega-buff supersoldier than from spamming frostbolt on a zombie dragon from their gnome.
4) As a combination of the above three points, Xbox games offer more instant gratification. At the end of a match, the game will tell you who did the best. At the end of a raid, there are so many factors to performance that it's sometimes impossible to tell who the best player was in a group of similarly skilled players.
Reply
3-18-2011 @ 3:30PM
Chandelure said...
http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2004/11/8/
Proof of your theory