Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-26-2011 @ 4:43PM
Sqtsquish said...
As a pve and pvp arms warrior I understand both sides of your argument- I agree that our warriors burst damage is too high, and I want to still be able to be able to do some damage in pve- heck it would be nice to kill things on pvp without having a requirement of a dispeller around.
As the recipient of continued balance changes to balance my pve and pvp spec so that it works for both I feel your frustration.
My question though is having one or 2 classes or specs that do very well against you when you do well against most others reason enough to ask for more buffs?
I ask this because if your preference is being able to manage handling all other specs in the game, than does that not mean that all other specs in the game range from moderate against you to very bad against you?
If being able to kite and destroy say a warrior is ok but getting crushed by a dk isn't, wouldn't the buff make it so the already struggling specs have absolutely no counter against you at all?
Reply