Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-27-2011 @ 11:48AM
Zinn said...
It is common to interpret "A is worse than B" as meaning the same as "A sucks". This is not what I mean. There are alot of things about warrior that are good, and I've stuck with the class for 3 expansions for a reason. I am talking about comparison - in terms of simplicity and the feel that you have the tools that will do the work, warriors don't come close to paladins right now. That doesn't mean that warriors suck, just that the tank classes are quite unfairly designed with most of the juicy stuff over in the paladin corner. Like I said, I used to enjoy the fact that warrior tanking was slightly trickier, because the paladin simplicity was boring. With skills you could still pull off some nice tricks, which I felt lacked with paladin tanking. Either way you rolled your face was basically a win as a paladin (and still is). Right now however, I feel like not only do I have to struggle 10 times harder as a warrior, it just doesn't pay off enough to be worth it.