Know Your Lore: Interbellum Part 4 - The Queen of the Dead

With Illidan set to return to the war against the Lich King, we now switch stages and ask ourselves, what of the effect of his initial attack? Even though stopped by Malfurion and Maiev, Illidan had done great damage to Northrend and the Frozen Throne stronghold of the undead mastermind.
Unbeknownst to anyone, the Lich King had gambled heavily when he had forced Frostmourne from the icy monolith that held the armor his spirit was bound into. The ice was his prison, yes, but it also held the vast necromantic powers that Kil'jaeden had bestowed upon him. By damaging it, he had started a slow leakage of his might. Clearly, he viewed this an acceptable trade-off for gaining a valuable servant in Arthas. Just as clearly, he never foresaw Illidan's attack on him with the Eye of Sargeras. Illidan's interrupted magical onslaught managed to penetrate the Scourge's defenses and do untold damage to their frozen fortress and, in the process, greatly damaged the ice tomb of Ner'zhul's spirt, causing his power to gush forth like blood from a wound.
At the pivotal moment when Kil'jaeden was renewing his alliance with Illidan, the Lich King found himself weaker than he had ever been. It was the ideal moment to strike, and so the decision was made by the frozen entity to recall its most loyal servant. In so doing, a series of events was set in motion that would lead to the end of the Menethil line's dominion over Lordaeron -- and indeed, the end of humanity's rule over the greatest of human kingdoms.
The dead would have their day.
Read Part 1: Forcing Fate's Hand
Read Part 2: Into the Outland
Read Part 3: To Rule a World
A Windrunner runs wild
At the end of his invasion of Quel'danas, Arthas Menethil (the death knight whose soul had been stripped from him by the runeblade Frostmourne, making him the loyal servant of the Lich King) was not satisfied with destroying the Sunwell in order to bring Kel'thuzad into undeath as a lich. He was wrathful with the high elves for their obstinate resistance to the Scourge invasion forces, especially the valiant Ranger-General of Silvermoon, Sylvanas Windrunner.
Arthas was so outraged with this scion of the Windrunner clan that he felt her death at his hands wasn't punishment enough for her having dared to try and protect her home and people from his invading armies. No, a fate far worse than death suited Arthas and his outraged pride, and he tore from Sylvanas even the comfort of death.
This act would ultimately come to cost Arthas a great deal.
Months passed after the destruction of Silvermoon and the coming (and then defeat) of the Burning Legion. Arthas returned to Lordaeron and easily deposed the three dreadlords who had been left in control of the vast Scourge armies by Archimonde, forcing Balnazzar, Detheroc, and Varimathras out of the ruins of Lordaeron and seizing total control in the name of the Lich King. While this worked out very well for Arthas while the Lich King was still in possession of the majority of his power, once Illidan struck, the situation quickly destabilized.
The undead Sylvanas, while still under the thrall of the Lich King, had been one of Arthas' chief lieutenants and had assisted in his purge of the remaining living holdouts, murdering them with cold efficiency and forcing them into undeath. She even managed to reclaim her physical body during this time. However, her loyalty was completely imposed from above. Once the Lich King's power began to wane, Sylvanas was one of the first of his servants to regain her will and a cold hatred for the man who had forced her into undeath began to burn in her dead heart.
Being contacted by the dreadlords was not a surprise to her. Hiding her growing free will and that of her banshee servitors, Sylvanas made a pact with the three nathrezhim to aid them in destroying Arthas, but in her own way and independent of their control. So when the dreadlords forced Arthas to retreat from Lordaeron (partially due to his waning power, so tied was he to the Lich King), she took the opportunity to strike and sent her bansheers to lure Arthas into a trap under the guise of a rescue operation. Deceived, the self-proclaimed King of Lordaeron found himself struck down by a special arrow crafted by Sylvanas that paralyzed him.
Helpless before her, he could only demand a death she had no intention of granting. Sylvanas fully intended to take her time with Arthas, returning him the "mercy" he had shown her. If not for the intercession of Kel'thuzad, she would have begun torturing Arthas to a slow death, but the lich destroyed her banshees and forced her to retreat, denying her the long-awaited vengeance and leaving her behind in Lordaeron. The Plaguelands, as they had started to be known, were now locked in chaos between those forces still under the thrall of the Lich King and those commanded by the dreadlords.
It would fall to Sylvanas to break that standoff.
A Scourge turns in a Forsaken hand
Varimathras appeared to Sylvanas, offering her a position under him and his brothers in the new order they sought to create in the Plaguelands. The former Ranger-General would have none of it. She and the banshees that served her sought only to be left alone to ponder what, if any, role monsters like the undead could possibly have. Varimathras, for his part, warned the Banshee Queen (as she was now called) not to attempt to stand in the way of the rulership of the dreadlords.
Really, he might as well have just asked her to conquer him, really.
Angered by the demon's presumption and her own undead state, and knowing the dreadlords would waste little time in destroying her, Sylvanas moved quickly. She used her banshee servitors to amass an army by possessing the leadership of local forces of ogres, gnolls, murlocs and even a band of human assassins. She then used these dominated forces to surprise and defeat Varimathras, who pledged his service to her in exchange for his own life (although his later actions involving the Wrathgate and the Battle for the Undercity make it clear that he was just biding his time). While neither the dreadlord nor the undead ranger trusted each other, each believed they could make use of the other. Sylvanas used Varimathras to act against his brother Detheroc.
Detheroc had assumed control of the human commander Garithos, hiding within the bigot's camp and using him and his men as shields against outside attack. However, with several agents capable of possessing and controlling the minds of others, Sylvanas successfully turned the tables on Detheroc, taking control of those who would have warned him and easily fighting her way to where Detheroc was hiding. With her forces, she easily overpowered and destroyed (seemingly at least) Detheroc, freeing Garithos from his control. Amazingly, Sylvanas managed to come to terms with the Grand Marshal, offering him control over Lordaeron in exchange for his aid in sacking the place and destroying the final dreadlord commander Balnazzar.
It worked rather spectacularly. The two-pronged attack of Garithos' forces from one end of the city and Sylvanas' army from the other managed to overpower the demons serving Balnazzar, and the dreadlord was quickly brought to bay. Sylvanas demanded that Varimathras kill his fellow dreadlord to prove his loyalty. (Even though Varimathras claimed that his people never killed one another, he then apparently did as she bid, although Balnazzar quickly returned in the role of Saiden Dathrohan, Grand Crusader of the Scarlet Crusade.) She just as quickly repaid Garithos for his aid with death. With this last act of murder, Sylvanas had defeated all rivals and cemented her hold over Lordaeron as well as the rebel faction of undead no longer bound to the will of the Lich King. This would be the birth of the faction known today as the Forsaken.
But while Sylvanas seized power in Lordaeron, the man she hated most made his way to the roof of the world and a final confrontation with the forces of Illidan Stormrage. Next week, we end this series with a look at the end of the Lich King and his rebirth.
While you don't need to have played the previous Warcraft games to enjoy World of Warcraft, a little history goes a long way toward making the game a lot more fun. Dig into even more of the lore and history behind the World of Warcraft in WoW Insider's Guide to Warcraft Lore.
Filed under: Lore, Know your Lore
Patch 5.3 interview with Ghostcrawler
Mystery of the Unborn Val'kyr
The latest patch 5.3 news
All of the latest Mists of Pandaria news





Reader Comments (Page 2 of 4)
SaintStryfe Apr 6th 2011 2:36PM
Yes, in theory, she offers a choice. But her choice is really this:
"Without your permission we raised you from the dead. No no, don't thank us - we don't require your services, we just thought it'd be a kick. Now you can serve the Banshee Queen, or you can have nothing - nothing but clothes on your back. No training, no experience, no money, no friends, no nothing... or you serve."
I've heard of Jersey Mobsters who were more fair then that.
Xlo Apr 6th 2011 3:25PM
@SaintStryfe
She also never mentions this lovely organization that takes in all members of race including undead HeadQuaters directly East of Undercity in Hearthglen.
Argent Apothecary Judkins is proof that if you are raised by her, you do not have to obey only escape. So yea she doesn't offer a choice, she gives you half truths and broken promises while trying to justify the very actions that made her.
clundgren Apr 6th 2011 6:29PM
Oh, I agree that the Forsaken are a dark race and have committed atrocities; I don't see how anyone could question this. But they aren't mere "slaves" as several posters (and the author of this column!) have suggested, and Sylvanas is more than a cartoonish supervillain. The Forsaken under Sylvanas really believe that they are an endangered species and will do almost anything to protect themselves. Have they managed to convince themselves that acts of outright aggression are in fact defensive? Clearly. This doesn't make them right, but it does make them interesting.
I think the genius of Blizzard is that they have made it so you can at least see things from the undead point of view. Take, for example, the undead soldier who is found almost catatonic with fear because "the humans are coming!" Suddenly, we realize that from a certain perspective, we really are the bad guys. It's a wierd perspective, but this is a fantasy world we're talking about.
j_sharpw4 Apr 6th 2011 11:29AM
I'm still unclear about how Sylvanas became such a popular messianic figure for a kingdom of mostly former humans.
Revynn Apr 6th 2011 12:17PM
Waking up as a rotting corpse can be a fairly confusing experience. As the Lich King's grip on them failed, the forsaken were finding themselves as lost people without a home or purpose. Stormwind certainly wouldn't accept them and Lordaeron was destroyed. Without her they were simply repegated to wandering around aimlessly and hiding from the Scarlet Crusade.
She banded them together and gave them a home, an identity and a purpose.
Cheeselandman Apr 6th 2011 12:34PM
Think George Washington. If necessary, I can go further into that comparison.
alexisj024 Apr 6th 2011 12:12PM
Love Lady S. Though since the fall of LK she is trippen. i'm curious to see how it all plays our with her. Are there books of WoW lore by ne chance? I would love to read some books on all the stories.
Tender Burntfuse Apr 6th 2011 12:32PM
Much Love for Sylvanas. She's one of the few characters Right now that have an actual feel to them.
Albeit a scarily dark and hypocritcal feel to her, but It's still something I can Understand more than some of the Leaders who have -no- ambition to them....... Im Looking at -you- Wrynn. So your Daddy got ganked by a greenskin, Toughen up a bit, get a few more cosmetically enhancing face scars and Get back in the Saddle. I hear Jaina's Schedule Freed up with Thrall Hookin up with that Aggra Girlie.
inb4 - Everyone she dates becomes a raid boss - Totally my intention, Dibs on his Hair product [spiking paste of daddy issues]
Ara Lane Apr 6th 2011 12:49PM
I think Sylvanas is by far the coolest character in the game.
Blayze Apr 6th 2011 12:45PM
Step 1: Attack a nation.
Step 2: Turn their dead into your slaves.
Step 3: Declare that since your group contains members of the enemy's dead, that their lands rightfully belong to your group.
Step 4: Repeat.
Did I miss anything?
Matthew Rossi Apr 6th 2011 12:46PM
Nope, that's pretty much exactly what Sylvanas does. It's worked in Hillbarad and it's working in Silverpine, Gilneas and Arathi as well.
clundgren Apr 6th 2011 1:09PM
Step 2 is not accurate. Most Forsaken clearly have free will, and the one thing that stands out in the Forsaken quest chains is how absolutely devoted they are not only to Sylvanus, but to each other as a people. There are a number of quests where Forsaken NPCs willingly and nobly sacrifice themselves to save their people.
The description of most Forsaken as mindless thralls is pretty prejudiced, though there are some (perhaps too damaged to have much of a mind left?) who don't seem to exhibit free will. On the other hand, this is true of the minor NPCs for all the races - we don't see human or orcish soldiers debating their orders either.
What is clear from almost every NPC interaction is that the Frosaken, not just Sylvanas, really do see Lordaeron as their land. Clearly the attack on Gilneas, for example, is more about aggression and is in fact ordered by Garrosh Hellscream. But it is not as simple as your 1,2,3,4 makes out, at all.
clundgren Apr 6th 2011 1:15PM
Just to follow up: it is striking how many quests Blizzard created in Silverpine, in particular, which involve Forsaken NPCs consciously making noble sacrifices for each other or their country. Blizzard really seems to be stressing the idea that the Forsaken, seeing themselves as outcasts (literally forsaken), are intensely devoted to each other. This makes them fanatical and vicious towards anyone they see as a threat, and even willing to see threats where they might not exist. But it also can make them behave very selflessly.
They are far from mindless zombies obeying Sylvanas.
arawn.chernobog Apr 6th 2011 1:29PM
NOT QUITE ACCURATE!
She doesn't turn the dead into slaves, all Forsaken are re-born with their free will intact, this is clearly demonstrated throughout the entire Forsaken experience as being crucial. There are many ways the dead will react to their newfound state:
1. Off themselves because "HOW DARE YOU DO THIS TO ME!? I'M A MONSTER!";
2. Go rogue and try to defeat Sylvanas because "REVENGE!" (usually ends badly since Sylvanas is packing an army and Necromantic powers);
3. Disbelief in their current state and then acceptance that they will find a true home amongst the Forsaken;
4. Secretely always admired the Forsaken but was just afraid of death, now that he/she has experienced it, they will join.
clundgren Apr 6th 2011 1:32PM
Ultimately, I guess what I am saying is that Blizzard has gone out of their way to make the Forsaken much more complicated than the original post implies, and I think it's a disservice to simplify them as mere slaves or pawns. Think of the Forsaken who behave nobly, or who are terrified of humans, or who hate being undead, etc and so on. Blizzard has gone out their way to give this race grey areas that belie a simple "ZOMBIE BAD" portrayal.
Bapo Apr 6th 2011 1:41PM
Well, it seems like they are forced to be obedient to Sylvanas, otherwise they're dragged to the bottom of the undercity...
Also, Silverpine where the Val'kyr raise more forsaken, and are immediately loyal to her, without so much as a question... Yeah... I'm not thinking this an option type case.
clundgren Apr 6th 2011 2:30PM
I cited both those instances. The Koltira one is a matter of a general not following orders, and Sylvanas is pretty ruthless, absolutely. The soldiers raised by the Val'kyr is not what normally happens when Forsaken are raised, and it does muddle the question a bit. However, normally it is stressed that the Forsaken have free will, and this is reflected in the NPCs you meet, some of whom even choose to attack Sylvanas!
It may be the case that there are some Forsaken in the military who are more like Slaves, but I suspect it is simply a case of Blizzard going for ease of exposition in that scene -- having each newly raised soldier go through the existential dilemma faced by most newly raised Forsaken is beside the point of what is happening in that piece of narrative so it is easier just to have them pop up as obedient soldiers. Similarly, when we meet masses of troops from any race they are typically presented as a sort of uniform mass rather than individuated npcs.
Blayze Apr 6th 2011 5:08PM
Not "zombie bad", perhaps.
"Hypocritical genocide zombie bad", however? Certainly.
aerrae Apr 6th 2011 5:46PM
@Bapo
They are given a choice, once they CHOOSE to follow Sylvanas, their loyalty to her is mandatory. The act of treason is most places, real and fictional is cause for death!
Take Koltira as an example, he choose to follow Sylvanas and the did something that could be considered treason to the Forsaken and the Horde, and he was/is being punnished.
Others choose not to be part of the Forsaken, look at lilian Voss as an example. she chose not to be part of the Forsaken, but in place of that chose to go on a murdering spree against those who would not help her. She was not forced into servitude, and she was allowed to go about what she wanted to do, or needed to do. A powerful ally she would have been for the Forsaken.
I think the choice of the Forsaken is not in question at all. I think the bigger issue is the Forsaken going against the horde several times, and Garrosh will need to remove the burden of Sylvanas' head from her shoulders...Mind you when that day comes, I will be in the corner of Sylvanas.
Al Apr 7th 2011 2:44AM
Hillbarad?
Typo, or did Rossi get split in half and teleported to two zones?