Blizzard issues Call to Arms clarification

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

4-08-2011 @ 4:31PM

Elvgren said...

Bribery is not a solution to a design issue. A band aid, yes, a solution, no.

I'll add my vote for giving the tank more control. A group leader is a group leader for a reason. Can it be abused? Sure. Will it be LESS abused than the vote kick? Yes.

This won't solve the overly common ass-hattery of the general population, but it will make a tank more comfortable signing up. Removing vote kick would be another good step. It was built to be abused. Get a bad group? Suck it up and finish or take the hit and quit it.

Add your comments

Your comments:

Remember me

E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.