Know Your Lore: The sorrow of Southern Barrens

Cataclysm brought with it a lot of changes -- the face of Azeroth was forever changed as the landscape altered when Deathwing burst forth onto the scene. But along with the physical changes, there were plenty of political changes as well. For the Horde, Cataclysm saw the rise of a new Warchief in Garrosh Hellscream, as Thrall took his place beside the Earthen Ring and tried to repair the tattered land. The Alliance saw the rise of the Council of Three Hammers in Ironforge, as Magni Bronzebeard's sudden demise left a hole in the heart of the Bronzebeard dwarves.
It was the shattering of the land that saw both Alliance and Horde forces immediately move to reconfigure their borders and take whatever land and resources they could possibly get. Though the war rages on, some places are no longer war-torn and filled with the sounds of combat. Instead, these once-populated areas are filled with the silence of lives lost, of the cautious footsteps of looters looking to take whatever spoils of war they can carry.
Perhaps the most saddening of these is the once-peaceful settlement of Camp Taurajo -- now a charred version of its former self, left to wither back into the harsh lands of the Southern Barrens.
The Southern Barrens presents a unique and new tactic with World of Warcraft storytelling. Two sides fight over territory, Alliance and Horde -- and the result of that fighting is a small outpost, one that wasn't doing any harm to anybody, populated by the relatively peaceful tauren, shredded to pieces. But what makes the storytelling so unique is the fact that there are two sides to it -- Horde players see one half of the events, Alliance players see the other. To that end, we'll be visiting both sides of the faction war, though today our focus is on the Horde side of the equation.

And so, shortly before the Cataclysm, plans were put in place to build a road straight across The Barrens, from Dustwallow Marsh all the way to Stonetalon Peak, connecting the two. It was understood that there would be Horde resistance, so forces were sent from Northwatch Hold to pave the way and clear out the area, including the Horde outpost of Honor's Stand. As for Camp Taurajo, though on the map it doesn't appear to be standing in the way of a road, it clearly stood in the way of progress. Orders were given by the Alliance to secure the roadways and anything that stood in the way, including Camp Taurajo.
Forces from Northwatch Hold started their march across the landscape, while forces from Theramore apparently did the same. The Northwatch forces attacked the Crossroads, holding them at bay and then, in the middle of the fighting, presented an organized march south to Honor's Stand. As for Camp Taurajo ... the tauren in the village were quickly overwhelmed and killed, the survivors barely managing to escape and fleeing north.

But The Barrens didn't just belong to the Horde -- the native quillboar of the area chose that moment to attack and captured many of the Camp Taurajo survivors. The land chose to move in their favor, and the brambles and thorny brush that the quillboar called their home rose up from the earth, quickly taking over the path between Razorfen Kraul and Razorfen Downs that led to the Great Lift in Thousand Needles. Not that any seeking refuge south had anywhere to go -- the ocean burst into the canyons of Thousand Needles and left behind a lake of water and still more lives lost.

But the Horde was strong, and the Horde would not let the Alliance pass. Though most of the survivors of Honor's Stand traveled south at the orders of Warlord Gar'dul, some insisted on staying behind and letting the Alliance know that they were encroaching on Horde lands. Embittered survivors of Taurajo holed up and created an outpost at Vendetta Point, where they continued to attack the Alliance forces that had murdered their kin -- and keep them away from the much more hospitable lands of Mulgore.
The tauren people knew that it was only a matter of time before the Alliance decided to launch an attack on Thunder Bluff. Before they could get that chance, the tauren constructed a great gate, blocking off the only entrance into Mulgore -- well, the only known entrance. High above the rest of The Barrens, paths over the mesas used for years only by tauren hunters were opened up, providing a vantage point to attack the Alliance forces below. The narrow paths were easily defended -- and the Great Gate into Mulgore remained firmly closed.

The tauren, already dealing with the suffering caused by Cairne Bloodhoof's death and the struggles to fight off the treacherous Grimtotem. The tauren, arguably the kindest race the Horde had to offer. Of all the Horde races, the tauren are the least deserving of the heartbreak they are receiving in Cataclysm -- first the loss of a Chieftain, then the inexplicable slaughter of a peaceful hunting outpost, the treachery of the Grimtotem, then the Cataclysm that saw an uprising of the quillboar which shattered the peace of Camp Narache, a flood that ruined the comforting rises of Thousand Needles.
Perhaps the most surprising note in all of this is that the attack on Camp Taurajo, on the Crossroads and on Honor's Stand was carried out by orders from Theramore. The Northwatch Patrols carry Theramore Merit Badges, clearly marking them as members of the Theramore forces. Camp Triumph, situated across from Desolation Hold, is populated with members of the Theramore army. A brief look at the new map of Dustwallow Marsh shows the beginnings of the road the Alliance wishes to construct. Which makes one wonder ... what exactly caused Theramore to order this assault? Or more correctly, Jaina Proudmoore, leader of Theramore?

So where exactly did Jaina go from sympathetic and compassionate leader, to someone who orders her armies to build a road across The Barrens and attack Horde outposts? Where did peace-loving Jaina, gentle friend of Thrall, retreat to? It's unlikely any of this was done under her nose, not with the extent of the assault. Was she influenced by Varian Wrynn and forced to side with her faction over her wish for peace? Was she so infuriated by Garrosh's rise to Warchief? Or has she simply been removed from the picture?

From the Horde perspective, the Southern Barrens is a tale of tragedy, vengeance, destruction, and a definitive look at the power of Garrosh's Horde. It's a story that raises more questions than it answers -- and though the person "responsible" for the massacre at Camp Taurajo is brought to justice swiftly and with no mercy, there is no satisfaction, no redemption with his demise. All that remains is yet another empty-eyed corpse, left to hang in the harsh landscape and rot in the unforgiving sun.
Come back next week when we take a look at the other half of the story -- the Alliance side.
For more information on related subjects, please look at these other Know Your Lore entries:
- Baine, son of Cairne, chief of the Bloodhoof tauren
- Go'el, son of Durotan
- Jaina Proudmoore
- Cairne Bloodhoof
While you don't need to have played the previous Warcraft games to enjoy World of Warcraft, a little history goes a long way toward making the game a lot more fun. Dig into even more of the lore and history behind the World of Warcraft in WoW Insider's Guide to Warcraft Lore.
Filed under: Lore, Know your Lore






Reader Comments (Page 3 of 6)
North Apr 24th 2011 7:09PM
The thing with Southshore is that it was a town of military significance since it was a harbor town. And the battles between Tarren Mill and Southshore pre-cata proved that Southshore would not lay down arms. So the Forsaken were forced to destroy the town if they wished to secure Hillsbrad.
Taurajo was a little different. The Alliance's first action was burning it down and attacking it in a way that ensured they could kill as many of its inhabitants as possible. I'm sure that if the Alliance marched in and laid siege as opposed to firebombing it on first site the taurens would probably have surrendered. Then the Alliance could just take prisoners and do a trade off with the Horde for their Alliance prisoners.
But that's not how it happened. They just swept in and started attacking without giving them a chance to flee or negotiate terms of surrender.
Amaxe Apr 24th 2011 7:17PM
Let's look at it this way.
Either the Horde knows of what Sylvanas did or they did not.
I would argue that if they did not, it could be considered criminal negligence given such a scope of mass murder.
If they do know, then we need to consider that they either approve, are indifferent or are powerless to stop it. Thus we have a setting where the Horde has a moral obligation to act against Sylvanas if they are to be considered "honorable" in any way.
So long as they do not remove Sylvanas from power, my RP toon would have to say that the Horde meaninglessly invokes the concept of "honor" while behaving in a dishonorable manner.
Taurajo, on the other hand, I think falls into a botched application of "Double Effect." The intended good was to eliminate a target which recruited and supplied soldiers. The bad effect was to kill civilians.
Now, we know from Alliance quest text that General Hawthorne willed the good effect, but **specifically** wanted to avoid the bad effect (hence the attempts to allow civilians to escape). We know that if it had been possible to destroy the target without killing any civilians, Hawthorne would have chosen that option.
(In terms of moral theology, the debate would be whether the end desired outweighed the unintended evil. If the intended good is less than the unintended evil, such an act would be unacceptable... this is why I say it was a botched application of Double Effect)
In contrast, an evil act would be to deliberately target the civilians to achieve the destruction of the village.
Since we know the harm done to the civilians was not intended, it is misrepresentation to say the Alliance intended the killing of innocents, and the Horde is appealing to dishonest propaganda in saying they did will this.
We can argue over whether Hawthorne gave incompetent orders or whether his orders were carried out badly by troops, but we can't equate the deliberate destruction of the Alliance towns and deliberate slaughter of Alliance civilians with the unintended killing of innocents in Taraujo.
lancrkllr Apr 24th 2011 7:57PM
@amaxe
I'm not going to argue about the events at southshore.
Lets put it this way... most of the horde wants the Forsaken out, so lets move onto the Camp Taurajo topic.
I agree that General Hawthorne really just wanted to push the Tauren back into Mulgore to allow for the construction of the highway, it's just a comparison between what he SAID and what he DID that causes some doubt behind his reasoning.
Considering that General Hawthorne stated that:
"Taurajo had a significant civilian population. I wanted to ensure that they could escape the fighting, and many did, finding refuge in the north."
Ok, that's honorable... attack the hunters (who are essentially the guards and "military force" of Camp Taurajo), while the civilians flee.
"When our scouts reported that Taurajo's most dangerous units were out on the hunt, we had to act quickly."
Ok... wait... so now that all the hunters ("military force") has left Camp Taurajo, the attack commences... Yes, that means that it's a rout of the Tauren forces (which is essentially the women and children). But since there aren't any enemy military forces for the Theramore military to clash, it's an overrun situation. Essentially, instead of trained soldiers dying to the blades of the Theramore Soldiers guess who stayed and fought to buy the civilians time to escape... more civilians.
When you do the horde quests... the 4 people you perform last rites for are:
* Omusa (the old Flight Master) "No, stay with the others. Escort them north, away from the fighting. I will stay here with the wyverns and cover your escape. Go!"
* Yonada (Tailoring Supplier) - "They've surrounded the camp! What are they doing here? Why are they attacking Taurajo? Get the children - run! RUN!"
* Dranh (Leatherworking Trainer)
* Krulmoo (Skinning Trainer) "I ran to wake up the others when the attack hit. Were they able to escape? I tried to fight off the soldiers with a skinning knife..."
So essentially, General Hawthorne led a military assault against 3 profession trainers and a flight master + his wyverns.
icepyro Apr 24th 2011 8:20PM
Having just finished Southshore, I'm kinda sketchy on this one.
As Putress proved at the Wrathgate, Sylvannas doesn't have full control over the Forsaken. Just as she gives lip service at best to those over her, her underlings also do their own thing.
She was working on the Blight, but Putress beat her to it and proceeded to ruin any hopes of her being seen trustworthy.
She is using some variation in Silverpine. She completely ignores Garrosh and convinces Cromush that this is quite effective and let it slide. Everything is going well. The land is in ruins, but there is no bat$#!^ crazy person in charge. This is why Sylvanas looks up to you so much despite the fact you are 65+ levels of experience lower. You are not bat$#!^ crazy.
At the end of Silverpine though, she withdraws from the front line to reconsider her perspective. So what happens? They overdo things and then are "oops, I used too much Blight". I swear, leave the Forsaken unsupervised for one minute and it's worse than a gnome and goblin combined. Talk about brain must have rotted before being raised or something. I mean we do take out the Warden in Hillsbrad because he's so loony even Sylvannas would have been repulsed.
So while Sylvanas fully inteded to take out Southshore, just as the Alliance took out Taurajo, I almost have to wonder if she approved of the method (the overkill, not just the use of Blight) at all or was like, "well, I did say take it out and it is taken out. Too late now to worry about it." I think the Forsaken disinterest in morals is what makes this seem so much worse than Taurajo. I am betting both wanted to avoid what happened in Taurajo and Southshore, but only the Alliance is capable of feeling guilty at how things played out.
Amaxe Apr 25th 2011 2:54AM
@lancrklr
Your statements don't show contradictions in the Alliance. The plan was to allow civilians to escape when the destroyed the target. When most of the guards were away, it was seen as an opportunity to carry out the attack with less loss of life. Civilians were killed. Nobody denies this. However the deaths of civilians were not intended in the attack.
Now of course we can consider that how the attack was carried out in the field was not the same as the plan made. However, in that case, the blame lies with those who disobeyed orders and attacked civilians. NOT with the General who gave orders to save lives.
The problem with this quest is that Blizz seems to have wanted to create something which had both sides standing with their side. This is a good idea of course. The problem is it is not an issue of different interpretations, but different facts. Contradictory facts, not contradictory interpretations.
It's almost like Blizz has four factions:
1) A noble Alliance for Alliance players
2) A noble Horde for Horde players
3) A barbaric Alliance for Horde players
4) A barbaric Horde for Alliance players
When you have this kind of difference in quests, you're going to have a huge mess based on the contradictory information... almost as if there were two coexisting alternate universes.
It would have been better to do a sort of investigation quest similar to the Inn quest in Dustwallow, where we find the truth of what happened and who was really to blame.
Brevalaer Apr 25th 2011 5:00AM
"With the rampant distrust of the Forsaken well known, even among the Horde, I don't think you can really blame what happened there on anyone but the Lich Queen's forces."
That's a convenient double standards policy you've got there.
Whenever an atrocity is committed, everybody shouts "Sylvanas did it!" and feigns total ignorance, while abovementioned Sylvanas enjoys all benefits Horde can offer her people and has no intention of quitting any time soon.
Nifty, huh.
lancrkllr Apr 25th 2011 12:24PM
@amaxe
I'm not sure you pulled out exactly what i was getting at. I agree that the General Hawthorne's plan was simply to rout the Tauren forces at Taurajo, my issue comes into his military decision.
From what is pieced together, General Hawthorne surrounded Camp Taurajo, leaving a small window in the lines for the Tauren civilians to flee north.
Considering that we can assume that a lot of those who make up the military within World of Warcraft (both Horde and Alliance side) carry deep seated hatreds towards the opposing faction, sending in ground troops into a soft target is not the way to go.
By allowing his ground troops to enter Taurajo after the firebombing, he effectively told his troops to "mop up the survivors" considering that he stated himself that they were not taking hostages. If the real decision was to raze the town and displace the populace, the only things necessary would have been a display of force (aka, the massive military force they brought to bear on Taurjo which contained both infantry from Theramore and Wildhammer Windriders) considering that the "military force" of Taurajo was out hunting.
There is a reason why the most modern military now uses a technique called "Shock and Awe" (or Rapid Dominance). For a target such as Taurajo (small town, large civilian population, small militia) the application of "Overwhelming Force" would have been appropriate, as it is designed to cause the enemy to flee, rather than stay and fight.
And before I get posts regarding that World of Warcraft is not "modern combat," I'd like to point out that "Shock and Awe" has been around for centuries, and has been used by Sun Tzu and the Roman Legions. It just wasn't until the mid 90s that it was dubbed "Shock and Awe." Considering that there are a lot of great military tacticians on both the alliance and horde side, i find it illogical to assume that no one ever realized the advantage acquired through the application of overwhelming military presence. I mean hell, both the alliance and the horde have been on the receiving end of a form of "Shock and Awe" from the Scourge.
Oh, and I know that a lot of the alliance soldiers who were killing civilians in Taurajo were "not following orders" or "went rogue," but you could say the same thing about Sylvanas the Forsaken and Southshore.
Hillazon Apr 24th 2011 6:34PM
Well, looking on the bright side, maybe now 4.1's version of Children's Week will finally have some cute lil Tauren orphans to escort around the world.
Whetu Apr 25th 2011 5:50AM
That is an awesome sentiment, Hillazon. Kudos to you.
easypeasy Apr 25th 2011 1:11PM
okay that comment has just made me decide to re subscribe my account. As a old Tauran resto shammy myself..... Think of the lil Tauran children needing to see the world.
Amaxe Apr 24th 2011 6:59PM
"It was the shattering of the land that saw both Alliance and Horde forces immediately move to reconfigure their borders and take whatever land and resources they could possibly get. "
Let's remember here just who exactly **lost** territory and who **gained** it.
This isn't really a "both sides are wrong and spoiling for a fight" thing here.
In Northrend, we saw:
1) Forsaken attacking Alliance vessels in Howling Fjord
2) Forsaken using the Alliance as test subjects for their plague.
3) Garrosh essentially telling Saurfang he's attack the Alliance to get the ports he needed.
4) Attacking Alliance forces who were trying to fight the Scourge.
The Alliance did not have similar "Kill Horde" quests until Icecrown.
The fact that we are at war is due to actions by members of the Horde and the refusal/inability/lack of interest/ignorance of Thrall to reign in his subordinates.
You could look at it this way.
1) The Alliance is entirely justified in going to war with the Forsaken to protect themselves from their hostile intentions.
2) The Horde, in taking sides with the Forsaken, show their actions are hostile to the Alliance.
3) Thus the Alliance is forced into war with the other Horde races whether they would prefer it or not... or else sit there blindly while the Forsaken commit atrocities.
I've said it before: Varian merely gave the Alliance permission to shoot back. Now we're in South Barrens seeking to put pressure on the Horde which runs roughshod elsewhere.
Cheeselandman Apr 25th 2011 2:19AM
I have two questions, really.
The first: which quest has the player killing alliance while they attempt to destroy the Scourge? I don't remember anything of the sort, and I'm curious.
The second: what "hostile intentions" have the Forsaken shown that the Horde has not? Fleets were already in conflict, forces already attacking each other, long before the Forsaken came into direct conflict with the Alliance in Northrend.
I'm one of the rare Hordies who can justify the actions of the Forsaken- at least to some extent.
Amaxe Apr 25th 2011 2:38AM
#1: See http://www.wowhead.com/quest=13228 http://www.wowhead.com/quest=13230#comments http://www.wowpedia.org/Quest:Make_Them_Pay!
(The Alliance side version shows that the Horde attacked them from behind while the troops are in battle).
#2: In Howling Fjord, the quests at the Forsaken site are all about attacking Alliance fleets and forces. The Alliance do not have a similar quest until Icecrown.
Udderpowered Apr 24th 2011 6:59PM
Don't any of the Theramore quests touch on this at all? Jaina just never seemed like the type to ever go along with this. IIRC pre-cataclysm there were those people trying to persuade Theramore guards to go back to fighting the Horde, could they be involved?
North Apr 24th 2011 7:14PM
Dustwallow Marsh got a revamp during Vanilla WoW. Because of this it had a very low priority among the devs when it came to changing the zones for cata. This is why Dustwallow Marsh's quests remain essentially the same despite the massive changes that has happened around the zone.
Although there is a highway in Dustwallow leading to the Barrens I haven't seen any quests yet that even acknowledge the Theramore highway or their role in the Barrens. All I see are just a few Ogres Hordeside trying to take back their village from a dragon (Onyxia) that died years ago.
Amaxe Apr 24th 2011 7:24PM
I hope they have a facelift coming. It seems totally clueless of Blizzard to ignore the effect of the war on Jaina's lands and clueless for them to invoke "just got a facelift in Vanilla" to ignore the real problem.
Thrall is no longer a factor in the Horde and Jaina no longer has access to appeal to the leader of the Alliance. Now her Alliance and the Horde are at war.
What does she think of Garrosh's actions? Sylvanas' actions?
What does she think of the war in South Barrens?
How does she want to involve herself in the war? A necessary war? Or seeking to find peace?
I was extremely when my Worgen rogue battled himself from Darkshore to South Barrens and seeing the war and the effects of the land and then getting to Theramore...
"What the @#$% do you mean I have to go get Thresher Oil again?"
Variatas Apr 24th 2011 7:31PM
Actually, Mudsprocket was during Burning Crusade, but otherwise you seem to be right. Which is frustrating, because it leaves a gaping hole in the Alliance's storyline for Cataclysm, second in import only to the Worgen just being dumped in Darnassus with no plot in sight until Eastern Plaguelands, while the Undead get to see what happens after Gilneas.
It may just be that those storylines were part of lower-priority zones, but it leaves Cata's "Old World Revamp" very one-sided in terms of content. I don't mourn the loss of Southshore (Except for going sight-seeing in Lordaeron) but the Alliance side of things is nowhere near as cohesive as the Horde side.
Speaking of priorities, what the hell happened to Arathi Highlands? That hadn't been touched since Vanilla, why'd it get skipped?
icepyro Apr 24th 2011 7:51PM
They wanted to release Cata in 2010, therefore, they had to stop the zone rework and make sure the game could be played. They admit that Arathi, Silithus, and Duskwallow Marsh are the least touched for these reasons.
vocenoctum Apr 24th 2011 9:13PM
The highway IS mentioned in the south barrens stuff, Alliance Side, as the tie in to the archaic and outdated Dustwallow content. "We built a highway for supplies and are getting nothing, go see what's going on!"
Variatas Apr 24th 2011 7:23PM
All of the arguments of which faction is more reprehensible aside, I think the biggest problem with the Southern Barrens' storyline is how aborted the storytelling is on the Alliance side. There's no lead-in, from what I saw; Duskwallow, which should logically be tied to it, is virtually unchanged since the Mudsprocket patch, all they seem to have added is the road and NPC's fighting each other over it, none of the quests reference it at all.
It'd be great to have these cross-faction storylines if they were at least complete on both sides, but like the Worgen storyline, all the action seems to go down on the Horde side and all the Alliance gets are dangling plot-threads.