Know Your Lore: The sorrow of Southern Barrens

Cataclysm brought with it a lot of changes -- the face of Azeroth was forever changed as the landscape altered when Deathwing burst forth onto the scene. But along with the physical changes, there were plenty of political changes as well. For the Horde, Cataclysm saw the rise of a new Warchief in Garrosh Hellscream, as Thrall took his place beside the Earthen Ring and tried to repair the tattered land. The Alliance saw the rise of the Council of Three Hammers in Ironforge, as Magni Bronzebeard's sudden demise left a hole in the heart of the Bronzebeard dwarves.
It was the shattering of the land that saw both Alliance and Horde forces immediately move to reconfigure their borders and take whatever land and resources they could possibly get. Though the war rages on, some places are no longer war-torn and filled with the sounds of combat. Instead, these once-populated areas are filled with the silence of lives lost, of the cautious footsteps of looters looking to take whatever spoils of war they can carry.
Perhaps the most saddening of these is the once-peaceful settlement of Camp Taurajo -- now a charred version of its former self, left to wither back into the harsh lands of the Southern Barrens.
The Southern Barrens presents a unique and new tactic with World of Warcraft storytelling. Two sides fight over territory, Alliance and Horde -- and the result of that fighting is a small outpost, one that wasn't doing any harm to anybody, populated by the relatively peaceful tauren, shredded to pieces. But what makes the storytelling so unique is the fact that there are two sides to it -- Horde players see one half of the events, Alliance players see the other. To that end, we'll be visiting both sides of the faction war, though today our focus is on the Horde side of the equation.

And so, shortly before the Cataclysm, plans were put in place to build a road straight across The Barrens, from Dustwallow Marsh all the way to Stonetalon Peak, connecting the two. It was understood that there would be Horde resistance, so forces were sent from Northwatch Hold to pave the way and clear out the area, including the Horde outpost of Honor's Stand. As for Camp Taurajo, though on the map it doesn't appear to be standing in the way of a road, it clearly stood in the way of progress. Orders were given by the Alliance to secure the roadways and anything that stood in the way, including Camp Taurajo.
Forces from Northwatch Hold started their march across the landscape, while forces from Theramore apparently did the same. The Northwatch forces attacked the Crossroads, holding them at bay and then, in the middle of the fighting, presented an organized march south to Honor's Stand. As for Camp Taurajo ... the tauren in the village were quickly overwhelmed and killed, the survivors barely managing to escape and fleeing north.

But The Barrens didn't just belong to the Horde -- the native quillboar of the area chose that moment to attack and captured many of the Camp Taurajo survivors. The land chose to move in their favor, and the brambles and thorny brush that the quillboar called their home rose up from the earth, quickly taking over the path between Razorfen Kraul and Razorfen Downs that led to the Great Lift in Thousand Needles. Not that any seeking refuge south had anywhere to go -- the ocean burst into the canyons of Thousand Needles and left behind a lake of water and still more lives lost.

But the Horde was strong, and the Horde would not let the Alliance pass. Though most of the survivors of Honor's Stand traveled south at the orders of Warlord Gar'dul, some insisted on staying behind and letting the Alliance know that they were encroaching on Horde lands. Embittered survivors of Taurajo holed up and created an outpost at Vendetta Point, where they continued to attack the Alliance forces that had murdered their kin -- and keep them away from the much more hospitable lands of Mulgore.
The tauren people knew that it was only a matter of time before the Alliance decided to launch an attack on Thunder Bluff. Before they could get that chance, the tauren constructed a great gate, blocking off the only entrance into Mulgore -- well, the only known entrance. High above the rest of The Barrens, paths over the mesas used for years only by tauren hunters were opened up, providing a vantage point to attack the Alliance forces below. The narrow paths were easily defended -- and the Great Gate into Mulgore remained firmly closed.

The tauren, already dealing with the suffering caused by Cairne Bloodhoof's death and the struggles to fight off the treacherous Grimtotem. The tauren, arguably the kindest race the Horde had to offer. Of all the Horde races, the tauren are the least deserving of the heartbreak they are receiving in Cataclysm -- first the loss of a Chieftain, then the inexplicable slaughter of a peaceful hunting outpost, the treachery of the Grimtotem, then the Cataclysm that saw an uprising of the quillboar which shattered the peace of Camp Narache, a flood that ruined the comforting rises of Thousand Needles.
Perhaps the most surprising note in all of this is that the attack on Camp Taurajo, on the Crossroads and on Honor's Stand was carried out by orders from Theramore. The Northwatch Patrols carry Theramore Merit Badges, clearly marking them as members of the Theramore forces. Camp Triumph, situated across from Desolation Hold, is populated with members of the Theramore army. A brief look at the new map of Dustwallow Marsh shows the beginnings of the road the Alliance wishes to construct. Which makes one wonder ... what exactly caused Theramore to order this assault? Or more correctly, Jaina Proudmoore, leader of Theramore?

So where exactly did Jaina go from sympathetic and compassionate leader, to someone who orders her armies to build a road across The Barrens and attack Horde outposts? Where did peace-loving Jaina, gentle friend of Thrall, retreat to? It's unlikely any of this was done under her nose, not with the extent of the assault. Was she influenced by Varian Wrynn and forced to side with her faction over her wish for peace? Was she so infuriated by Garrosh's rise to Warchief? Or has she simply been removed from the picture?

From the Horde perspective, the Southern Barrens is a tale of tragedy, vengeance, destruction, and a definitive look at the power of Garrosh's Horde. It's a story that raises more questions than it answers -- and though the person "responsible" for the massacre at Camp Taurajo is brought to justice swiftly and with no mercy, there is no satisfaction, no redemption with his demise. All that remains is yet another empty-eyed corpse, left to hang in the harsh landscape and rot in the unforgiving sun.
Come back next week when we take a look at the other half of the story -- the Alliance side.
For more information on related subjects, please look at these other Know Your Lore entries:
- Baine, son of Cairne, chief of the Bloodhoof tauren
- Go'el, son of Durotan
- Jaina Proudmoore
- Cairne Bloodhoof
While you don't need to have played the previous Warcraft games to enjoy World of Warcraft, a little history goes a long way toward making the game a lot more fun. Dig into even more of the lore and history behind the World of Warcraft in WoW Insider's Guide to Warcraft Lore.
Filed under: Lore, Know your Lore






Reader Comments (Page 4 of 6)
Eirik Apr 25th 2011 5:45PM
I agree. But perhaps their intent is to coerce people who READ quests into playing both sides?
I dunno. Perhaps Blizzard intends the books to fill out the parts of the stories that it doesn't present to us in-game. And I'm nowhere near post-cataclysmic Loremaster on even one side. I'd earned the title pre-shattering, but still only on one side. And now it's a whole new world out there.
Taedran Apr 24th 2011 7:25PM
Don't forget, a lot of what happened in Ashenvale was a result of the Twilight's Hammer meddling... as read in The Shattering
Amaxe Apr 25th 2011 12:47PM
Twilight Hammer was a spark to set things alight to be sure but not the cause of the hatred between Horde and Alliance.
It's kind of like the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in 1914 which was the spark which led to the start of WWI. However, if the tinder wasn't already there, the Twilight Hammer would not be able to have exploited it.
jordan Apr 24th 2011 7:28PM
Before Things get too out of hand here's a little perspective, a conversation between an alliance player and General Hawthorne:
Tell me what happened at Taurajo.
Ah yes, our assault on the Horde town of Taurajo. I struggled with the implications of the decision.
Taurajo was admittedly what you might call a 'soft target,' primarily a hunters' camp. Still, it had been used to recruit, equip, and train Horde infantry for many years.
When our scouts reported that Taurajo's most dangerous units were out on the hunt, we had to act quickly.
We sacked the town?
I would prefer not to use the term 'sacked,' but yes, the attack went off flawlessly. We removed Taurajo from the equation, confiscated its arms, and destroyed its smithing facilities. The assault gave our forces considerable breathing room and knocked the enemy off balance.
Nonetheless, during the assault, I instructed my men to leave a gap open in our lines...
Why did you do that?
Taurajo had a significant civilian population. I wanted to ensure that they could escape the fighting, and many did, finding refuge in the north.
There are some, even in Alliance High Command, who argued that I let an opportunity slip away. That I should've taken hostages. But I don't see the value in those sort of terror-tactics.
Hear me out, : I want this war to end someday. It won't ever stop if we butcher or imprison civilians.
I just pray that there are those on the other side who see things as I do.
Basically this is the same old story of good intentions paving the path to hell. To make matters the horde players aggravate the situation by doing things Like killing this guy and extinguish any hopes for peace. On both sides the players screw things up by exacting revenge and making things worse.
Durenas Apr 24th 2011 11:02PM
Yeah, and keep in mind, everyone, that the alliance and the horde ARE at war. You can argue whether the use of poison gas(forsaken plague) is a violation of the 'rules of war' or not, you can argue whether southshore was a civilian or military target, but the reality is, there are no rules in these kinds of wars. The only rules are the ones the participants choose to follow. I would say that General Hawthorne was probably well-intentioned. Sylvanas just didn't care.
onetrueping Apr 25th 2011 6:49AM
I was under the distinct impression that Hawthorne was killed by his (rather creepy) underling, who thought he was far too soft on the Tauren. Particularly after a lot of foreshadowed gloating on the man's part, and his exceptional interest in his superior officer's plans for transport. Whether he was in league with a few Horde (using them or collaborating), or did it on his own, I'm not certain, but betrayal definitely seems to have been on the menu.
Groth Apr 25th 2011 11:08AM
The point of these quest chains is so that both sides DON'T see anything but their own actions- which is also why this article is solely about the Horde perspective.
The Horde player's "aggravating" the situation is simply based on how it looks from their perspective- a chance to kill a military commander responsible for an unprovoked attack on a civilian target.
If he'd wanted to avoid any casualties, then turning up in full force when the camp was guarded, and offering a chance for the Tauren to withdraw would have been the honorable option. Thinking that an army which until recently has been imprisoned will follow orders well is scarily naive- which given the General's tactics and intentions is a real pity.
It's also worth noting that at no point does he suggest that this was anything he wouldn't repeat if put in the same situation. He doesn't like saying that Taurajo was sacked, but it was. He knew it was a soft target, and still treated it like a military one.
I still think the Horde's ahead in the world-wide atrocities committed, but it's nice to see the Alliance making stupid decisions too. Plus it's awesome for world PVPing!
Amaxe Apr 24th 2011 7:28PM
One final thought.
The Horde can't really say the war was forced on them.
Saurfang predicted this:
http://www.wowhead.com/item=35941
Groth Apr 25th 2011 11:21AM
So the Alliance attacked because the Horde is being lead by a more aggressive Warchief?
If the new Horde leadership has been weaker than Thrall the majority of situations would still be happening.
If Thrall was still in charge, alot of it would still be going on.
Shockingly, the Horde are not responsible for the way the Alliance acts.
Saurfang was only talking about the way Garrosh was in Northrend- and believe it or not, but he has shown SOME improvements (very few though).
If the Alliance was under different leadership, it probably wouldn't have happened (unless Moira was in charge). Ofc the Horde would still be doing nasty stuff, and other nasty situations involving the Alliance would have arisen I'm sure- otherwise there would be far too many players complaining that they were always getting the short straw re new lore.
The interesting change is that Blizz is making BOTH sides far less squeaky clean.
Amaxe Apr 25th 2011 12:38PM
That's certainly an interesting putting words into my mouth never said.
The Horde attacked first and on a wide front, while Southern Barrens was a counterstrike by the Alliance. Alliance quests are generally involving discovering Horde attacks and trying to defend against them. Southern Barrens is essentially the only place (unless you want to count that half-assed attack on Stonard in Swamp of Sorrows) where the Alliance is on the offensive in any way.
Saurfang essentially pointed out that the Horde was going into a dangerous direction growing in popularity because it succeeded.
I believe the fact that the Alliance is almost entirely on the defensive demonstrates who the aggressor is.
Cheeselandman Apr 25th 2011 5:35PM
Actually, I've interpreted that letter to say the METHODS the horde was using were returning to a dark place- not the actual actions. He isn't protesting Garrosh's campaign in Northrend, he is protesting the rash and uncaring actions that Garrosh encouraged- like for example the attack on horde forces from behind.
Its not the conflict that Saurfang cares about, its how the Horde fights its conflicts. As to the Alliance attacking the Horde...
...I'd have to agree with Groth. Looking at it on a front-by-front basis:
Northern Kalimdor (Ashenvale, Orcs v. Nightelves), Alliance aggressors all the way back in the third war. While the orcs eventually came under the effects of the Burning Legion, the initial conflict was started by the Night Elves. Even to this day, Night elf raiding parties still attack Orgrimmar.
Southern Kalimdor (Dustwallow, Humans v. Orcs) Conflict originated from Admiral Proudmoore, refusing to abide by jaina's treaty with thrall. While unknown, I suspect a lingering resentment among Jainia's guard is the reason for the eventual conflict with the Horde in Southern Barrens.
Northrend:(Orcs vs Humans, Forsaken vs. Humans) Horde aggressors, however looming threat of the Lich King means relatively neutral relations except for a few isolated cases. North Fleet incident unknown; survivors from storm could have washed up, alliance base could have been attacked, or forsaken base could have been attacked.
Northern Eastern Kingdoms: (Forsaken vs. Humans, Forsaken vs Worgen) Forsaken aggressors against Worgen, marching on Gilneas in force soon after Cataclysm. Humans declare war on Forsaken during Wrathgate, Varian Wrynn invading Undercity then declaring to see "this kingdom of thieves and murderers disbanded"- even after both Putress and Varimithras have been dealt with.
Four (possibly five or six depending on how they're counted) basic fronts, and personally I see the Horde as defending its people and interests.
Amaxe Apr 25th 2011 8:04PM
Very good RP here... that's a good example of someone taken in by Horde propaganda ;-P
The Horde is very good at playing the victim and blaming others for what they dealt themselves.
Ashenvale: Orcs invade the sacred homeland of the Nelfs, kill Cenarius, drink the Blood of Mannoroth again. By any reasonable standard they were the aggressors. Ashenvale is the ELVES land and the orcs have no claim to it, nor to their resources.
South Barrens: Nobody but Admiral Proudmoore is on Proudmoore's side. Their settlement was a convenient jumping off point for the Alliance counterattack
Northrend: Acts of war against the Alliance leading up to the open attack in Northrend... Forsaken experiments on captured prisoners, attacks on Alliance troops. No reciprocal quests on Alliance side.
With the exception of South Barrens which looks like a counterattack, all the fronts are directly caused by Horde actions.
Rheni Apr 27th 2011 3:39AM
Amaxe is right, the Horde is more eviler than the Alliance.
Any criticism of the Alliance is thus null and void.
Unfortunately, its that precise nagging, morally superior 'nothing would sway my faith in the Alliance' attitude masquerading as logic that makes my black little horde heart fill with glee each time I kill an Alliance toon.
I'm sure not ALL Alliance deserve it, but since I'm playing the "proven" immoral faction, eh... why should I care?
Amaxe Apr 27th 2011 9:04AM
Never said the Alliance was pure and undefiled. I said the Horde was good at blaming others instead of admitting when they are to blame.
Since the topic was concerning the allegedly "victimized" Horde, my response was made to this.
icepyro Apr 24th 2011 7:35PM
I was actually surprised that Mankrik wasn't mentioned. I mean... speaking of sorrow of Southern Barrens...
I can't wait for next week, because I've been very curious about the Alliance side of things especially after some of the discussion on Safe Passage. I'm currently leveling some more alts in other areas, but every now and then I keep seeing references that make it sound like Taurajo wasn't the one-sided slaugter the Horde side leads you to believe. Don't spoil anything there though.
Shanic Apr 24th 2011 7:35PM
There is an Alliance explanation to most of the things many of the readers are commenting on. Since that is next week, I'll wait until next week to talk about it. :)
Instead, I'll just point out that it's not like the Tauren aren't getting owned by the Horde as well. Bloodvenom Post was ransacked by a Forsaken gone mad, and Cliffwalker Post was annihilated by war hungry Horde commander and his forces. While both of these evildoers are brought to justice, many Horde tend to forget that the Tauren aren't just losing settlements and getting killed because of the Alliance.
Chivvy Apr 24th 2011 7:57PM
Omusa's Spirit says: ...wait, it is over? I've been run through... Ah. Of course. I understand now. I am expected elsewhere.
This is the closest I have ever come to crying at a quest in WoW. Southern Barrens is probably my new favourite zone, so far at least.
Rabbit Apr 24th 2011 10:51PM
Chivvy-I have to admit that I was misty eyed over the Omusa part of the quest as well. I've always loved the Barrens, Tauren, and Camp Taurajo and have spent many long evenings protecting it from Alliance players. No longer will I enjoy standing guard in the warm Barrens sun that always felt like a summer evening, chatting a lot and fighting on occasion. With the destruction of Camp T, a little spark of something that felt like home to me died as well. Light the pyre:
The Earth Mother watch over us under cover of the night as in the day. Let this fire illuminate both our bodies and spirits and remind us of our honored ancestors, who are ever present and guiding our way.
Sorcha Apr 25th 2011 5:42AM
I did cry. He got onto a wyvern and flew off into the sun. It's an incredibly well-done zone, I wanted to slaughter Alliance by the hundred after that questline.
pakkman781 Apr 24th 2011 8:08PM
Southshore is just as relevant as long as the Horde calls the Forsaken allies. Until Garrosh cracks down on Sylvanas, he is indirectly supporting her actions.