Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
4-24-2011 @ 7:56PM
Synchronizor said...
Yes, I'm not going to be surprised if this treatment of the story leads to a lot of flaming.
This is a fair, accurate description of the Horde side and perspective to the story in the Southern Barrens. However, the two-week format really can't help but come across as biased against the Alliance. The Alliance side of the events are a strong counterbalance to the Horde perspective, but I think this issue, which is quite touchy for a lot of people, will suffer from being split up.
It would have been far more constructive, in my opinion, to offer both sides of the conflict in a longer, single article; even if it took longer to write and pushed the release back a week.
In any case, I urge everyone here to hold off on condemning the Alliance for their actions until both sides of the story have been explored.