Know Your Lore: The struggle for Southern Barrens

All they needed was a supply route. With the abdication of Warchief Thrall and the rise of the new Warchief, Garrosh Hellscream, suddenly the Alliance discovered what it meant to have a true orc at the helm of the Horde -- a merciless killer who held no particular love or wish for understanding and peace. Suddenly, the days of mild skirmishes were over, and the attacks in Ashenvale and Stonetalon had begun in earnest as the Horde moved from quietly settling the land and using its resources to taking it by force.
The night elves struggled to fight back, but the remote location, so far away from the human settlements of Northwatch Hold and Theramore, left only one route for the Theramore forces to take in order to get those supplies delivered. It was one that took them straight through the heart of Horde territory -- the harsh, expansive desert of The Barrens. And so the Alliance came up with a plan: A road was to be constructed. With a road, the Alliance could easily transport caravans and troops to defend those caravans and help their allies defend against the crippling attacks.
It was just a simple road.
However, the Alliance were soon to find out that in The Barrens, life was anything but easy -- a lesson the Horde had learned when they first settled on the continent of Kalimdor years before. A plan was put into place: Alliance forces from Theramore and Northwatch Hold would march on The Barrens, securing the land and clearing the way for the road to be paved from Theramore, where construction on a new highway had already begun in earnest. Meanwhile, troops from Northwatch Hold were deployed to clear the way to Stonetalon and keep the Horde busy so that supply lines could get through.

The Horde forces were led by an orc named Karga Rageroar, who had already intercepted a ship carrying worgen fleeing from the beleaguered lands of Gilneas. The worgen fought back, and as Rageroar slaughtered the worgen left and right, a few managed to escape. Rageroar ordered his men to fire on the ships, taking the scalp of a fallen worgen and wearing it as a gruesome trophy. Few of the worgen made it to land, but they did so off the shores of Northwatch and immediately began to offer what help they could to the Alliance stronghold.
Meanwhile, at Honor's Stand, the Northwatch forces found themselves struggling to hang onto the land they'd managed to take hold of, as orc and tauren forces pelted assaults on the settlement from above. What the Alliance didn't and couldn't know was that the tauren had been using trails high above The Barrens to hunt for years, and those paths were now being used with deadly efficiency by the attacking Horde troops. Not only were the Northwatch troops unable to continue into Stonetalon, where they were desperately needed, they were barely managing to hang on themselves, their own supplies dwindling desperately thin. Northwatch Hold was unable to send any relief due to Horde attacks at their doorstep, and the entire Alliance fleet, so carefully prepared and ready for anything, was a scattered mess.

Meanwhile, further south, a man had been placed in charge of clearing the way, a man who was rightfully wary of the Horde and wary of war in general. He wasn't a cruel man by any stretch of imagination; he knew that war had to be fought, but he wanted the fight to be short, precise, and with as minimal a loss of life as possible. He wasn't a cruel man, no, but his choices, no matter how merciful they may have seemed, ultimately didn't matter to the Horde -- what mattered was the blood on his hands, not his motives for spilling it. And justice would be swift and brutal. The man's name was General John Hawthorne, leader of the Forward Command.

What Hawthorne didn't realize was that the lines left open for fleeing tauren civilians led straight into the heart of quillboar territory -- and that the quillboar were natural enemies of the tauren. Doubtless he assumed since the quillboar and tauren had shared The Barrens for years that the two were allies; but the escaping tauren from Taurajo found themselves captured, with even fewer numbers able to make it out.Tell me what happened at Taurajo.
"Ah yes, our assault on the Horde town of Taurajo. I struggled with the implications of the decision. Taurajo was admittedly what you might call a 'soft target,' primarily a hunters' camp. Still, it had been used to recruit, equip, and train Horde infantry for many years.
When our scouts reported that Taurajo's most dangerous units were out on the hunt, we had to act quickly."
We sacked the town?
Hawthorne wrinkles his brow. "I would prefer not to use the term 'sacked,' but yes, the attack went off flawlessly. We removed Taurajo from the equation, confiscated its arms, and destroyed its smithing facilities. The assault gave our forces considerable breathing room and knocked the enemy off balance. Nonetheless, during the assault, I instructed my men to leave a gap open in our lines..."
Why did you do that?
"Taurajo had a significant civilian population. I wanted to ensure that they could escape the fighting, and many did, finding refuge in the north. There are some, even in Alliance High Command, who argued that I let an opportunity slip away. That I should've taken hostages. But I don't see the value in those sort of terror-tactics.
Hear me out: I want this war to end someday. It won't ever stop if we butcher or imprison civilians.
I just pray that there are those on the other side who see things as I do."

General Hawthorne was arguably the most decent man the Alliance had working the front lines. But the Horde didn't see the motives behind the man; they merely saw the killer responsible for the deaths at Taurajo, and they wanted vengeance. A strike force was sent out to intercept Hawthorne on his way back to Fort Triumph, and Hawthorne was quickly eliminated. His body was recovered, but the spirit he tried to instill in his troops, the wish for mercy and peace, for a quick end to the war, evaporated.
What he left behind was a group of tired, bitter soldiers, angry at the Horde for their continued attempts to undermine what was supposed to be a simple mission. The Alliance troops were desperate for supplies, simply trying their best to help their allies. And those Alliance troops would stop at nothing to defend their right to keep the fragile foothold they'd placed in The Barrens. The death of their General only stoked the fires of anger and hatred higher -- ironically, the last thing General Hawthorne would have wanted.

But when one thinks about it, what General Hawthorne represented was one of the last bastions of decency and sanity that existed out there in The Barrens -- a way of thinking that was eerily similar to Thrall's vision of a peaceful union between Alliance and Horde. Much like what is happening in the rest of Azeroth, General Hawthorne's death almost seems to represent a cruel reminder that that vision has evaporated, replaced with the cold savagery of Hellscream's reign.
The interesting part about the Southern Barrens lies in the story told, however. Players who play through one side of the situation without looking at the other come out of it convinced that justice was met, one way or another. But players who take the time to level a character through both sides of the story are left with the ultimately unsatisfying impression that in the end, nobody was right. Neither side was completely justified in taking the actions that they took.

Instead, what we get is death -- endless, brutal, nonsensical death on both sides, and each is left with the impression that they are right, and the other side is wrong. It's a glimpse into the world of war -- a world where people lose themselves in the bitter throes of battle and death and forget about things like common sense and mercy, in the name of the greater "good." It's an odd stance for something as simple as a video game to take -- and it's a beautifully constructed, if ultimately depressing, piece of storytelling.
The Southern Barrens is only one part of Kalimdor, but it highlights events, tensions and thoughts that are being echoed over the whole of Azeroth. The tensions between Alliance and Horde are higher now than ever before, perhaps higher than they've ever been. Hellscream will stop at nothing to secure land and supplies for his new Horde, and the Alliance will valiantly fight to protect their land and their people, until the bitter end. And that, ultimately, is what the Southern Barrens leaves one with, in the end -- a bitter taste, from the moment players step on the fields of blood until they leave, having done nothing to solve the situation but to move on and leave the fields of battle behind.
For more information on related subjects, please look at these other Know Your Lore entries:
- The sorrow of Southern Barrens -- Horde side
- Baine, son of Cairne, chief of the Bloodhoof tauren
- Honor, Krom'gar. Never forsake it.
- Jaina Proudmoore
- King Varian Wrynn
While you don't need to have played the previous Warcraft games to enjoy World of Warcraft, a little history goes a long way toward making the game a lot more fun. Dig into even more of the lore and history behind the World of Warcraft in WoW Insider's Guide to Warcraft Lore.
Filed under: Lore, Know your Lore






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 7)
Throm May 1st 2011 8:33PM
I doubt asking Baine would have worked; many Tauren are participating in the attacks on the Alliance in Ashenvale and otherwise, and the planned attack on the refugee outpost of Lor'danel.
The Tauren are as much the of the Garrosh's Horde as the orcs now. And that is a very, very sad fact.
Scunosi May 1st 2011 9:33PM
Plus, while Baine himself may have allowed them through, just think of the repercussions when Garrosh gets wind of it. There's no way he'd allow any of his Horde to help Alliance, and Baine would be in a tight bind if he did.
Of course, while talking about "What if Jaina...." why couldn't she just port them all to Darnassus? I mean every level 40 Mage can do that. :P
Murdertime May 1st 2011 9:43PM
I'm not sure where people got the idea the Tauren were ever 'nice'. They've been engaged in a genocidal war for years. In the occasions you've been up against people they've viewed as enemies, they've been pretty ruthlesss. They sided with the Orcs because they pretty much have the exact same animistic tribal warrior culture, just with slightly less spikes and anger control issues.
They're part of Garrosh's horde for the same reason orcs are. Garrosh embodies of the more stabbie orientated virtues of their culture.
Mitawa May 1st 2011 11:34PM
"The Tauren are as much the of the Garrosh's Horde as the orcs now. And that is a very, very sad fact."
The sadder fact is that the tauren are loosing more land to the orcs than the Alliance.
Gee whiz, we seem to need a watch tower here, fellas. Why don't you move up the hill a bit? Oh wait, no... we'll need that too eventually. You know, while you've got your stuff packed up already, why don't you just let us handle things in Stonetalon for ya?
The tauren are way too nice, and I'm starting to think they ought to join with Vol'jin and just revolt.
Angus May 1st 2011 11:50PM
One could still have managed a much less dumb way of sacking a "soft" target.
Jaina could have ported up to Baine and said "Send a runner to the gates at Mulgore and one to camp Tarajo. When the runner at camp T arrives, the town will have 10 minutes to pack and get to the gate. We will allow the gate to be open for 10 minutes. After that, we are not responsible for a loss of life. I am sorry, but Stormwind was very specific about this and I suck at standing up to men that aren't about to become arch-villains."
Leaving a gap in their lines that led through unknown territory vs letting them get to their own damn gate and pulling your forces back to allow them to go to their race's stronghold?
Yay, someone made a bad call if he actually wanted to save lives and not piss off a race known for using tree trunks as melee weapons...
Noyou May 2nd 2011 12:54AM
"I doubt asking Baine would have worked..." Never know til you try. As an Alliance player this story saddens me. I recently played through the area and it made me feel a little better than what I have been reading mainly on here from horde biased individuals. But still, why the Tauren? Why the silly little outpost? Why give Garrosh any fuel for his propaganda? You could also argue the Tauren's gave up the village when they put their wall up. But that still doesn't justify what they did. I mean how would we feel if another country came into ours and said "hey you guys leave we are building a road so our military can march through." I'm pretty sure the negotiations would turn physical. So yeah, It doesn't hurt to ask. Hell some kegs of ale and spice bread could have went a long way ;)
Draelan May 2nd 2011 3:54AM
Asking would have been unlikely to work... If I'm understanding this article correctly, the REASON Alliance wanted to build a road through the Barrens was to get supplies to their forces fighting the Horde in Ashenvale and Stonetalon. Now, even if there were no Tauren troops in either of those places, and even considering the fact that Baine does not like Garrosh, for Baine to willingly allow the Alliance to build a supply road to reinforce their troops against the Horde would be nothing short of treason. He would betrayed his allies by willingly allowing their enemies free passage. This is not something Baine would have done. He did not put aside his desire for vengeance to remain in the Horde just to throw it all away like that. If he had WANTED to leave the Horde, he could have asked Jaina for her support in exchange for the Tauren's allegiance when he was preparing to drive the Grimtotem out of Thunder Bluff. But, no, the Tauren are loyal through-and-through.
Psnack May 2nd 2011 12:01PM
Asking Baine would not have worked for a few reasons.
1) The Alliance would be asking to build a military supply route through the heart of Horde territory. No matter how amicable relations between Baine and Jaina are the Horde and Alliance as wholes are still enemies.
2) The purpose of the supply route was to reenforce Alliance operations in Stonetalon Mountains. That area is ancestral Tauren land. Why would Baine allow anyone to safe passage (let a lone build a supply route) through Horde territory when the purpose of said route is to supply an invasion of Tauren territory and attacks on his people? The Alliance had even gone so far as to ally with the Grimtotem. "Hey Baine, is it cool if we build a road through your town so that we can help the people who murdered your dad takeover Stontalon Mountains?"
3) Due to the Night Elf's trade embargo against the Horde the Alliance couldn't even "sugar coat" the operation as the expansion of a trade route. "Why should we allow you to build a trade route through our territory when you refuse to trade with us?" would be the natural response.
kenny May 2nd 2011 2:20PM
Noyou... "I mean how would we feel if another country came into ours and said "hey you guys leave we are building a road so our military can march through."
Read up on your Native American history and ask that question again.
BB Crisp May 2nd 2011 4:51PM
"Jaina could have ported up to Baine and said 'Send a runner to the gates at Mulgore and one to camp Tarajo. When the runner at camp T arrives, the town will have 10 minutes to pack and get to the gate. We will allow the gate to be open for 10 minutes. After that, we are not responsible for a loss of life. I am sorry, but Stormwind was very specific about this and I suck at standing up to men that aren't about to become arch-villains.'"
And the Tauren response would have been "Send all available troops to Camp Taurajo. The alliance has threatened to take out our outpost if we don't grant them passage."
The attitude of "move, or we'll move you" never sits well with anybody.
Loopho May 2nd 2011 11:51PM
"They've been engaged in a genocidal war for years. In the occasions you've been up against people they've viewed as enemies, they've been pretty ruthless."
I dunno, considering they were on the receiving end of the genocidal war with the centaur first, and were nearly wiped out, I'm not going to hold their current stance against them.
Deleuze May 1st 2011 8:35PM
It's disappointing that the author of these articles doesn't even try to hide her anti-Horde bias.
Helston May 1st 2011 8:39PM
This is intended to be biased towards the Alliance, like how last week's article - http://wow.joystiq.com/2011/04/24/know-your-lore-the-sorrow-of-southern-barrens/ - was the same story, but biased towards the Horde.
Deleuze May 1st 2011 8:41PM
To specify: anything the Alliance does is or can be justified. It's just a road they wanted, after all. And anything the Horde does is slaughter. Because it's lead by an Orc. And they are merciless killers BY NATURE, because that's what makes them Orcs (as the author has stated in her text about Orc history).
Am I the only person to see the racism embedded in these texts?
Throm May 1st 2011 8:53PM
What the Horde wants and how they get it can be justified as well. In fact, it was explained how what they did was justified in The Horde side of the Southern Barrens article last week.
Both the Alliance AND the Horde are brutally entrenched in this war. The sacking of Taurajo and the firebombing of Astrannar prove that.
Neither side is right. Neither side is wrong.
And yeah, orcs ARE killers by nature. Being so infused with demon blood that their skin tone is permanently changed and all that.
Udderpowered May 1st 2011 8:57PM
It seemed quite clear to me that she was saying it from each faction's own perspective.
RothKeahi May 1st 2011 9:09PM
In the article from last week I see nothing justifying what the Alliance did, all I see is them invading Horde territory, attacking towns along the way and the Horde doing their best to defend their lives and their land.
Chro May 1st 2011 9:24PM
The author does seem a little biased in favor of alliance, in both this and the 'horde-slanted' one. They went into the slaughter of civilians very little in the horde side (and yes, civilians who are defending their homes from soldiers with skinning knives are still civilians), particularly when the tauren have a culture of 'do not conquer land, but defend your homes no matter the cost'. Putting a hole in the line just lets the cowardly ones to have a chance of escaping (into quillboars, yay.)
B1ue May 1st 2011 9:32PM
@Deleuze
Do you truly think this is Alliance biased? I thought the complete opposite. The Alliance comes off looking like a bunch of bloodthirsty idiots, that had exactly one decent man on the entire continent, while the Horde are more or less rightfully angry given the information available to them. Even the comment about Jaina can be taken as a barb.
I suppose my real criticism with this article, is that if it, as I believe it is, meant to be Alliance biased, it isn't biased enough for my taste.
Anne Stickney May 1st 2011 9:52PM
Boy golly, if it's not me being anti-Horde on this article, it's me being anti-Alliance on this one - http://wow.joystiq.com/2011/04/10/know-your-lore-the-vancleefs-the-rise-of-the-defias-and-westfa/