Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
5-02-2011 @ 2:42PM
Shinae said...
Even though I am a pet collector, I don't buy the Blizzard store pets. I will, however, make an exception for this one.
Good move, Blizz.
Reply
5-02-2011 @ 2:46PM
Luci said...
Same here - I usually do buy the charity ones, but with a 100% donation there is just no question. Plus, I have wanted this pet from the TCG forever.
So basically, it's like paying me to eat cake.
5-02-2011 @ 3:01PM
wutsconflag said...
@Luci:
I was amazed to see it was 100%. Way to go, Blizzard!
5-02-2011 @ 4:19PM
relmatos said...
I refused to help blizzard cash in hiding behind the guise of charity when they offered 50% of the sales.
Since it's 100%, I purchased it immediately.
5-03-2011 @ 10:30AM
Zaniac said...
@relmatos
When they only donated 50% of the income, it was a brand new pet.
This isn't. They haven't done any work on it at all, besides changing the name...
That's right, this isn't even a re-PAINT. It's a duplicate. An exact copy.
As an owner of the original, I feel a little sad about that fact, but I still bought this one as well. It's for a good cause, and still counts towards the achievement at least.
I would much rather they spent the time and effort to create a brand new pet and only donated half the income, however. If I want to donate to a worthy cause, I don't need an excuse. I already did. My reason for buying this pet was simply that it was another pet. ... And it isn't really, is it?