The OverAchiever: Mountain O' Mounts from professions

There are a number of interesting (and by interesting, perhaps I mean "occasionally very expensive and likely to drive you insane via RNG-laden accessibility") mounts available from professions, though for some of them, you'll have to be a practitioner in good standing before you'll ever be able to learn them.
Regrettably, I am the bearer of some very bad news this week concerning the Vial of the Sands for all those of you who like circumventing the highest costs in the game.
Also read:
- Combining The Ambassador and Mountain O' Mounts
- Mountain O' Mounts in Outland
- Mountain O' Mounts in Northrend
- Mountain O' Mounts in 5-man dungeons
- Mountain O' Mounts in raids
- Mountain O' Mounts from achievements
- Mountain O' Mounts from PvP
Alchemy
There's one mount available from alchemy, but you're if the alchemist in question, you'll have to spend a fairish amount of time involved with high-level (450+) archaeology as well. If you're not an alchemist, you can buy it off a player because the Vial of the Sands is BoE, albeit a very expensive BoE.
- Sandstone Drake You're going to spend an awful lot of time digging up tol'vir artifacts for a shot at the recipe for this bad boy, but I have to admit that I really liked the implementation of the Vial of the Sands all the same. Granted, we started off with an absolutely atrocious amount of RNG involved in getting this, which has been ameliorated somewhat, but how can you not love the idea of digging up a thousand-year-old alchemical recipe from a jar buried in an ancient desert city? Anyway, the recipe's available as a random drop from Canopic Jars, which you'll find alongside tol'vir artifact fragments. Most of the time, the jars will contain Mummified Organs (oh, eww), but eventually you'll hit pay dirt and the get the Vial recipe. However, creating an actual Vial is a hugely expensive undertaking. Even if you're an herbalist/fisherman and can easily afford to create the eight Flask of the Winds, Flask of Titanic Strength, and Deepstone Oil necessary, you'll still have to blow your daily Truegold transmute 12 times (or buy it off others) and shell out for the non-negotiable, 5,000-gold Pyrium-Laced Crystalline Vial and the 3,000-gold Sands of Time (eight of them!). It used to be possible to save yourself something like 8,000 gold by running a goblin character out to Yasmin (the seller) in Uldum to take advantage of Best Deals Anywhere and the guild perk Bartering, but Blizzard seems to have hotfixed that happy little trick out of existence just a few days ago. Sorry, folks.
Archaeology
There are two mounts available from archaeology (three if you count the Vial of the Sands required for the Sandstone Drake above):
- Fossilized Raptor This one's relatively easy to get and will probably pop up before too long if you consistently work on fossil artifacts. Judging from comments on both Wowhead and the forums, most people seem to get it around 200-250 archaeology skill, but as with just about everything else concerning archaeology, don't bank on it. You might get it as early as 100, but you also might find yourself putting multiple copies of gray artifacts together at 525 before it finally pops up. That's rare, but it can happen. Console yourself by saying that everyone has at least one nightmare artifact eluding their grasp in archaeology.
- Ultramarine Qiraji Battle Tank This one's statistically more likely to be that nightmare. Like the Vial of the Sands, the Qiraji Battle Tank -- or, more accurately, the Scepter of Azj'Aqir that summons it -- is a tol'vir archaeology item, which means you're not going to get a shot at it until 450 skill at the earliest. You'll find some people on Wowhead with horror stories about having thousands upon thousands of useless night elf and fossil artifact fragments by the time they work their way through the tol'vir rares, but as far as I recall, the situation was improved by Blizzard's hotfixing an increase to the number of tol'vir spawns in Kalimdor. Is it worth it? This is the only qiraji bug mount available outside of the Temple of Ahn'Qiraj raid unless you're one of the extraordinarily few players with the Black Qiraji Resonating Crystal, so my answer is yes.
There are no mounts available from blacksmithing.
Enchanting
There are no mounts available from enchanting, but there are faction-specific pets as of Cataclysm. We'll cover this in a later guide to the new pet achievements we talked about in The OverAchiever: New achievements in patch 4.2.
Engineering
There are three mounts available from engineering, but beware: Neither of the two flying machines can be learned by non-engineers, and the motorbikes are both very expensive (though less so than the Vial, above).
- Flying Machine (engineers only) The Flying Machine is actually pretty easy to build for an engineer fresh to Hellfire Peninsula, provided you've been keeping up on your profession leveling. You'll have to mine up a ton of Fel Iron for the various materials, but nodes are plentiful in Hellfire and Zangarmarsh. Assuming you can get your hands on enough, this is an absurdly cheap mount to build, and hey! If you're Horde, this also means never having to fly an ugly-ass wyvern! Reason enough for me to level engineering on my tauren warrior.
- Turbo-Charged Flying Machine (engineers only) The epic version requires a hell of a lot more time, if for no other reason than the need for eight Khorium Power Cores. The problem with Khorium Power Cores is that they need -- wait for it -- Khorium, and this is a rare spawn that can pop up on any given Outland mining node. With Outland depopulated since the end of The Burning Crusade, you'll often find yourself alone in a zone flying from one node to the next hoping against hope that some damn Khorium will spawn. While you can check the auction house and occasionally Qiff in Netherstorm's Area 52, you may not have much luck on a small to medium server, and the little Khorium you'll find there tends to be expensive as hell.
- Mechano-Hog (Horde)/Mekgineer's Chopper (Alliance) WoW's own motorbikes! I still remember when these were introduced in the Wrath of the Lich King beta. But you know how the Vial's so expensive because of a non-negotiable materials cost? Well, the motorbikes are what that was patterned on. Titansteel's cheaper than it used to be (then again, how could it not be compared to the opening days of Wrath?), but the Salvaged Iron Golem Parts are 3,000 gold, the Goblin-Machined Pistons (eight of them!) are 1,000 gold each, and the Elementium-Plated Exhaust Pipe is 1,500 gold. Oh, and they're also only available from a vendor in the Storm Peaks' K3, unless your engineer gets lucky and "skins" them off mobs in Ulduar. Yes folks, it's a gold sink, but judging from the number of them infesting the average server, it's an effective one. Also the subject of the achievement Get to the Choppa!
There is one mount theoretically available from fishing, although you couldn't prove it by me:
- Sea Turtle Ye gods. Yet another horribly random fishing drop that eludes yours truly. Oh well, it's not like Blizzard hasn't given me another crack at it. Once available only as a very random drop (El's Extreme Anglin' pegs it as 1 in 2,000 to 1 in 5,000) from any Northrend pool, its availability has been expanded to all pools in Azeroth's Cataclysm zones as well, including Tol Barad. Getting this is often best combined with One That Didn't Get Away so that you're making yourself miserable for the purpose of multiple achievements rather than just one. However, as someone who fished up umpteen million Fangtooth Herring in Wrath without once seeing either a Dark Herring or a turtle, it's also possible that you'll make yourself miserable for the purpose of no achievements. Bitch, bitch. Moan, moan. Also the subject of the achievement Turtles All the Way Down.
There are no mounts available from inscription.
Jewelcrafting
There are no mounts available from jewelcrafting.
Leatherworking
There are no mounts available from leatherworking.
Tailoring
There are three mounts available from tailoring and, like their flying engineering counterparts, they're tailors-only:
- Flying Carpet (tailors only) Like the standard-issue Flying Machine for engineers, this is a fairly easy starter flying mount to make if you've been keeping up with your professions when you reach Outland. The flying carpet mounts were famous for a period in Wrath for situating character models right in the middle of them -- by which I mean half on top and half below -- leading to a rash of people who appeared to have been eaten by ambulatory rugs. Curiously enough, this also wound up being an issue with the stone drake models when Cataclysm went live. I wonder if the issue was caused by the same errant bit of code.
- Magnificent Flying Carpet (tailors only) Like the Frosty Carpet below, this was originally intended as the epic flying counterpart to the Flying Carpet, but it's trainable and has a much cheaper materials cost.
- Frosty Flying Carpet (tailors only) Whenever I see one of these (well, the carpet mounts more generally), I'm immediately transported to that memorable night in Sunwell when our raid leader was chewing us out over our abysmal performance on what was supposed to be farm content. After a particularly appalling series of wipes on the Twins, he paused to catch his breath between (accurate) denunciations of our performance when we all heard a tinny little voice over Vent. Turns out our DPS warrior had leaned back from his computer and was quietly singing A Whole New World to himself. The raid never really recovered that evening. What does this have to do with the Frosty Flying Carpet? Absolutely nothing.
Working on achievements? The Overachiever is here to help! Count on us for advice on Azeroth's holidays and special events, including new achievements, how to get 310% flight speed with achievement mounts, and Cataclysm reputation factions and achievements.
Filed under: Achievements, The Overachiever
Patch 5.3 interview with Ghostcrawler
Mystery of the Unborn Val'kyr
The latest patch 5.3 news
All of the latest Mists of Pandaria news





Reader Comments (Page 2 of 6)
Helston Jun 2nd 2011 11:27PM
I did the same sorta thing Tempes. Was flying over Hyjal on the way to Org having just paid a visit to the rep vendor and saw a pool near the Gates of Sothann, realised I'd never fished in Hyjal before and BAM, turtle.
Noyou Jun 2nd 2011 9:12PM
@ Revynn
I wouldn't be at all surprised if Stella gave up her WoW sub long ago. It seems she likes to use this platform to bitch and moan about every facet of the game. The real question is why troll this site? If you have this much vitriol go to the forums. Write your congressman. I mean do you yell at the people at fast food chains for asking if you want fries or anything extra with your meal? And those you can only use once ;)
ladygamertn Jun 2nd 2011 9:16PM
Gee... my hunter got her Turtle mount on about the 3rd pool when she was actually fishing for something else on the coast of Borean Tundra.
MusedMoose Jun 2nd 2011 9:44PM
There are two (2) mounts that you can buy with real money. According to Wowhead, there are three hundred and one (301) mounts in the game. Now, I'm no math major, but to me, that sounds like two hundred and ninety-nine (299) mounts within the game that you can get without paying a dime outside of your usual WoW subscription. Hardly the sky-is-falling scenario that you've depicted.
Also, your reliance on the slippery slope fallacy is utterly transparent, as I pointed out in an earlier reply to you. Further, how can you call people con artists when they say "For this amount of cash, you get this item," and that's exactly what happens? If you can link me to where Blizzard said that they would *never* sell in-game items, I'll concede the point, but you haven't been conned at any point.
Have you considered getting a blog? Then you could go on about this kind of thing to your heart's content without bothering anyone else. You seem to think that this site is your personal soapbox, judging by your usual posts, and I hate to break it to you, but that's not the case.
wyattwelch97 Jun 2nd 2011 10:09PM
I hate you.
Tempes Magus Jun 2nd 2011 10:00PM
It wouldn't be bad if there wasn't a subscription.
Are they charging as a game or charging as a service? Are they charging for content or time?
Maybe people are gullible to pay for mounts in the store, but it's only because they have a subscription that you have to keep paying to use the store-bought stuff.
Blizzard has to make money somehow, but double-charging for things is a dubious business practice no matter what the product or service is.
Tempes Magus Jun 2nd 2011 10:07PM
Don't be putting Stella down for complaining, people.
Customers, or potential customers, have a right to complain about products and business practices. If they didn't then we would all be paying $15 per minute to play the game and $50 for a movie ticket and $10 for a candy bar or some other insane prices just because companies can get away with it and collude.
Laws that protect us consumers came from consumers complaining. The customers have the power, as they rightly should.
Those who don't question things and actively oppose those who complain are doing nobody any good.
Shirubia Jun 2nd 2011 10:07PM
''its availability has been expanded to all pools in Azeroth's Cataclysm zones as well, including Tol Barad''
The turtle mount is not fishable from Tol Barad, the achievement tooltip says:
''Fish up a Sea Turtle mount from any fishing pool in Deepholm, Mount Hyjal, Twilight Highlands, Uldum, or Northrend.''
Artificial Jun 2nd 2011 10:26PM
@Tempus Magus: It's not double-charging any more than having to pay for your popcorn at the movie theater is "double-charging" because you already bought a ticket. And yes, people have a right to complain, but that doesn't mean every single customer complaint is valid. A lot of people complain about perfectly harmless things because they're idiots. Case in point, see above...
MusedMoose Jun 2nd 2011 10:32PM
@ Tempes Magus -
I disagree that Blizzard is double-charging for anything. Paying for the mounts is simply purchasing a product, while paying to play WoW is effectively renting space and access on Blizzard's services. You're paying for two different things, not twice for the same thing, even if the use of one is contingent on the payment of another. Artificial's point above is also a good one.
And people are not gullible at all if they buy the mount, because there's nothing shady going on. The store states clearly that it's an in-game mount applied to a single WoW license. If anyone thinks they get any use of the mount without a WoW subscription, that's their own fault for not reading the product's description. Blizzard is not attempting to fool anyone.
As for Stella's complaints, from what I've seen people say about them, they put her down because she rants at length about several topics whenever anything is even remotely related to them. This topic is a good example - the column is discussing how to work toward getting 100 mounts, and she chose to use it as her soapbox to turn the conversation to her personal pet peeves. Speaking for myself, I find it tremendously disrespectful to the site's writers - it's like attending a lecture and, when asked if there are any questions, standing up and yelling at the crowd about something vaguely related.
Also, your comments about laws protecting consumers are largely irrelevant here, as Stella's not complaining anywhere that Blizzard will hear her, at least not here - she's complaining to the members and writers of this site. I don't know if anyone at Blizzard reads this site or not, but I do know that as fellow members, we have every right to respond when someone posts inflammatory comments.
"Customers, or potential customers, have a right to complain about products and business practices. If they didn't then we would all be paying $15 per minute to play the game and $50 for a movie ticket and $10 for a candy bar or some other insane prices just because companies can get away with it and collude."
This is a slippery slope fallacy, like I've noted above - the argument of "things will get worse if we do/don't do this" is fallacious. And as consumers, we always have the option *not* to buy a product, a fact seemingly lost on those who continuously complain about the items in the Blizzard store.
terph Jun 2nd 2011 10:59PM
Somewhat off topic, but the One that Didn't Get Away was impossible when I tried it with the Fangtooth Herring/Turtle strategy. :( I gave up hunting pools and just parked myself by the starter area ponds. Then I could chain fish all night long, listening to podcasts or chatting. Seeking pools adds another layer of misery.
Incidentally, the pool issue is why my 10,000 fish guild achievement is still 8,000 shy of being completed. And that's my last recipe in the whole game too. (shakes lazy, lazy fist)
Hal Jun 3rd 2011 6:30AM
I actually got my turtle mount working on the guild fishing achievement. While it was an exciting moment, I'd gladly trade it back for some RNG love with archaeology.
Reanne Jun 2nd 2011 11:12PM
A Whole New World= Magnificent Flying Carpet
Its the exact same carpet as was in the movie and b4 blizz changed the tooltip, the tooltip said some lyrics from A Whole New World
llcjay2003 Jun 3rd 2011 12:23AM
One says, "A new fantastic point of view" and another says, "Don't you dare close your eyes" on the mount buff tooltip.
It is things like this that make me love Blizzard.
Reanne Jun 13th 2011 12:10AM
ikr
blizzard knocks off bunches of stuff...its cheap but i love them more for it
Tempes Magus Jun 2nd 2011 11:25PM
@Artificial
Do you pay for your popcorn and then pay for the time to eat it or can you eat it on your own time, whether you see the movie or not?
Seriously, that was not a smart analogy because it only helps my point.
I don't think anybody complaining about monetary issues is an idiot, unless they want everything completely fro free without even paying once.
Stella has a valid point about a cash shop being tacked onto a subscription game. It's about a product, the game, being sold as a service, the recurring subscription, and then wanting to charge for what you get in that service as well.
It's like paying for a plumber to come in and fix a leak only to have to buy each tool he uses from him so he can fix the leak, or buy his vehicle that he works out of.
It's not smart to pay twice for anything, first for the product and then again just to be able to use it. That is why cellphone companies offer free phones with their plans. It would probably be illegal, at least in some countries, to charge for the phone and then the customer can't use it until they pay again.
Blizzard, and every other subscription MMO company, is pretty lucky their practices haven't been looked at, with any scrutiny, by any lawyers or "ambulance chasers" or any sue-happy people. If that did happen then they would be in dep trouble for such dubious practices even with their ToS and EULA.
They just haven't had their business practices put to the test by the legal system yet, unlike other industries.
@MusedMoose
"I disagree that Blizzard is double-charging for anything. Paying for the mounts is simply purchasing a product"
I agree, but the problem is you don't actually own that product and can't use it unless you pay the monthly fee.
They have to decide, are they charging for a product and actually transferring ownership or they charging a service where they keep ownership and can't charge for the product?
I understand having a "server access fee", but if they are allowed to, and should, charge for content then why aren't they charging for every big or little free patch?
Either they are overcharging on the server access fee so that they cover other costs or they are giving away those patches for free, which makes me wonder why a business would do that when they could make quite a bit more money.
And then if it really is a "server access fee", why can't we play Wow offline solo or with our friends on a single computer, multiplayer?
If we don't actually own the product then why are they charging for the product?
If we need to pay for a service to use the product then why are we paying for the product ownership if we're just renting it?
This doesn't make sense. At best, we're gullible to buy into this dubious financial model and it should be changed. At worst, this is an illegal practice that is screwing over customers.
I'm quite alright with paying money, even paying enough for them to make a profit. I just will not pay twice for something I don't even really own, especially since such a practice is likely illegal.
They need to figure out how they want to make their money and do that, not this trickery they have been doing.
Either sell a service or sell a product, don't sell a product then sell a service to "activate" the product. Either get rid of the subscription or get rid of all content prices for things we can't use without the subscription paid.
Legal trouble can and will likely follow if they don't change.
"Also, your comments about laws protecting consumers are largely irrelevant here, as Stella's not complaining anywhere that Blizzard will hear her, at least not here - she's complaining to the members and writers of this site."
Stella can't post on the Blizzard forums, or likely have an email read, unless she pays Blizzard for game time.(last I checked only subscribers could post and get customer support).
This blog is the next best thing to being heard through the proper channels, especially for those who choose(arguably wisely) to stop paying for something they do not trust or believe in anymore.
I would like some answer from Blizzard as to these concerns. I would like to see some legal responsibility taken by them. We are entitled(by the true proper definition of that word) to fair pricing and fair business practices.
I don't pay Blizzard anymore so I can't post on their forums either, but I would pay them if I got answers and they dealt with my concerns.
I am happy to give Blizzard money for a very good game, but I'm not stupid enough to fall for the trickery of paying more than once for a product. I bought the game disks so why can't I play them, at least offline?
Tempes Magus Jun 2nd 2011 11:48PM
@MusedMoose
"This is a slippery slope fallacy, like I've noted above - the argument of "things will get worse if we do/don't do this" is fallacious."
Human behavior is largely predictable. They lie and cheat if they can, at least enough of them do to have earned words in our dictionaries(lie, cheat, steal, fraud...).
Can you honestly tell me that the gas price we have today are as they should be given the laws of supply and demand and cost? Can you really say that when gas price were $4-$6 a gallon a few years ago and then immediately dropped to half that, $2-$3, when people voiced complaint?
Does that not strike you as odd that gas prices would drop to half of what they were within a month without a doubling of production as demand is still increasing? Can you honestly believe that $4-$6 per gallon was justified after they dropped the price to $2-$3 per gallon and still made a profit?
There are reason international corporations tend to have their corporate headquarters, and much of their business holdings, in countries that are outside the reach of the USA and other countries with laws protecting the consumer. It sure isn't because of import taxes that make it more expensive to do business.
They are outside those countries in countries that have laws that allow them to more easily set exorbitant prices.
I have made no claims as to false information. I have used nothing but observations of easily obtainable facts.
If companies could, and some can, get away with raising prices then they will simply to pad their pockets.
The rich are never happy with 'rich enough" otherwise why would somebody with a severance package of $20 million(at least 10 times what most people could easily live off of without ever working again) continue to work rather than taking the severance package and enjoying his healthier years with his friends and loved ones? Why would somebody with financial assets they can(and plan to eventually) liquidate, right now, for many tens of millions, maybe even billions, of dollars not do so and live off that money? Why wouldn't they allow an equally capable person to take their place and enjoy that success?
Here is another point.
How can any one "human", who is not disabled or mentally deficient, only be worth $20 thousand per year while another "human", of measurably equal faculties, be worth $20 million per year?
How does one person who just delegates work to others, signs paperwork and can come and go from work almost anytime he pleases "earn" $20 million per year while another person who works 84 hours a week doing the most important jobs for a company, the actual necessary work, only earn around $60 thousand per year after all that overtime?
How can someone in upper management, who has a lot of helpers and knows next to nothing about the work the most important people in the company do at the bottom, actually "earn" 333 times what the worker, that does the work that earns the company the money that pays everyone's' salaries, makes?
I'm pretty sure that we wouldn't be doing as well as we are without laws to protect consumers and workers from those who can and will take advantage of the system.
llcjay2003 Jun 3rd 2011 12:22AM
"If you're Horde, this also means never having to fly an ugly-ass wyvern!"
So true... It is not even Blizzard's fault. The wyvern is established in lore as a horde mount and, in theory, it should be awesome. But it is simply...not. At all.
cyanea85 Jun 3rd 2011 12:35AM
Two mounts in as many years. THE FLOOD GATES HAVE OPENED! THE END IS NIGH!
Seriously though...getting mounts outside of the game by paying real money is not new to the game. The amount of people who came into my comic book/card shop to buy Dark Portal packs just for a shot at the Spectral Tiger, even though they didn't play the TCG was ridiculous. Then there was the Rocket Mount. Then there were all the other TCG mounts.
Instead of paying a couple hundred bucks (people have done it) for a mount they might not get, now they're paying one sum to Blizz directly. How is this any different?
Tempes Magus Jun 3rd 2011 12:46AM
@cyanea85
It's not any different, but those weren't as well known as today's "Buy this mount today!" mounts. The newer mounts are much more affordable and more common as well.
Hell, that was the biggest complaint about the Celestial Steed. So many people were angry that it was everywhere "throwing a sign saying they spent $25 in my face".
Anyway, my points still stand. None of that should have ever happened, or there should be no subscription.
I will gladly pay for content or time, but not both content and the time required to use it, unless they allow us to play WoW with every piece of content we bought offline with the option to play online for a reasonable subscription price for "server access fees".
I can't really see how they can legally get away with "server access fees" if they don't allow you to play the content you bought, and thus own, offline.
It just does not make sense, unless you admit that it's unnecessary greed and probably illegal, to charge for content, including the original box, and time to use it with no option of using the product you own without the subscription.