The OverAchiever: Mountain O' Mounts from professions

There are a number of interesting (and by interesting, perhaps I mean "occasionally very expensive and likely to drive you insane via RNG-laden accessibility") mounts available from professions, though for some of them, you'll have to be a practitioner in good standing before you'll ever be able to learn them.
Regrettably, I am the bearer of some very bad news this week concerning the Vial of the Sands for all those of you who like circumventing the highest costs in the game.
Also read:
- Combining The Ambassador and Mountain O' Mounts
- Mountain O' Mounts in Outland
- Mountain O' Mounts in Northrend
- Mountain O' Mounts in 5-man dungeons
- Mountain O' Mounts in raids
- Mountain O' Mounts from achievements
- Mountain O' Mounts from PvP
Alchemy
There's one mount available from alchemy, but you're if the alchemist in question, you'll have to spend a fairish amount of time involved with high-level (450+) archaeology as well. If you're not an alchemist, you can buy it off a player because the Vial of the Sands is BoE, albeit a very expensive BoE.
- Sandstone Drake You're going to spend an awful lot of time digging up tol'vir artifacts for a shot at the recipe for this bad boy, but I have to admit that I really liked the implementation of the Vial of the Sands all the same. Granted, we started off with an absolutely atrocious amount of RNG involved in getting this, which has been ameliorated somewhat, but how can you not love the idea of digging up a thousand-year-old alchemical recipe from a jar buried in an ancient desert city? Anyway, the recipe's available as a random drop from Canopic Jars, which you'll find alongside tol'vir artifact fragments. Most of the time, the jars will contain Mummified Organs (oh, eww), but eventually you'll hit pay dirt and the get the Vial recipe. However, creating an actual Vial is a hugely expensive undertaking. Even if you're an herbalist/fisherman and can easily afford to create the eight Flask of the Winds, Flask of Titanic Strength, and Deepstone Oil necessary, you'll still have to blow your daily Truegold transmute 12 times (or buy it off others) and shell out for the non-negotiable, 5,000-gold Pyrium-Laced Crystalline Vial and the 3,000-gold Sands of Time (eight of them!). It used to be possible to save yourself something like 8,000 gold by running a goblin character out to Yasmin (the seller) in Uldum to take advantage of Best Deals Anywhere and the guild perk Bartering, but Blizzard seems to have hotfixed that happy little trick out of existence just a few days ago. Sorry, folks.
Archaeology
There are two mounts available from archaeology (three if you count the Vial of the Sands required for the Sandstone Drake above):
- Fossilized Raptor This one's relatively easy to get and will probably pop up before too long if you consistently work on fossil artifacts. Judging from comments on both Wowhead and the forums, most people seem to get it around 200-250 archaeology skill, but as with just about everything else concerning archaeology, don't bank on it. You might get it as early as 100, but you also might find yourself putting multiple copies of gray artifacts together at 525 before it finally pops up. That's rare, but it can happen. Console yourself by saying that everyone has at least one nightmare artifact eluding their grasp in archaeology.
- Ultramarine Qiraji Battle Tank This one's statistically more likely to be that nightmare. Like the Vial of the Sands, the Qiraji Battle Tank -- or, more accurately, the Scepter of Azj'Aqir that summons it -- is a tol'vir archaeology item, which means you're not going to get a shot at it until 450 skill at the earliest. You'll find some people on Wowhead with horror stories about having thousands upon thousands of useless night elf and fossil artifact fragments by the time they work their way through the tol'vir rares, but as far as I recall, the situation was improved by Blizzard's hotfixing an increase to the number of tol'vir spawns in Kalimdor. Is it worth it? This is the only qiraji bug mount available outside of the Temple of Ahn'Qiraj raid unless you're one of the extraordinarily few players with the Black Qiraji Resonating Crystal, so my answer is yes.
There are no mounts available from blacksmithing.
Enchanting
There are no mounts available from enchanting, but there are faction-specific pets as of Cataclysm. We'll cover this in a later guide to the new pet achievements we talked about in The OverAchiever: New achievements in patch 4.2.
Engineering
There are three mounts available from engineering, but beware: Neither of the two flying machines can be learned by non-engineers, and the motorbikes are both very expensive (though less so than the Vial, above).
- Flying Machine (engineers only) The Flying Machine is actually pretty easy to build for an engineer fresh to Hellfire Peninsula, provided you've been keeping up on your profession leveling. You'll have to mine up a ton of Fel Iron for the various materials, but nodes are plentiful in Hellfire and Zangarmarsh. Assuming you can get your hands on enough, this is an absurdly cheap mount to build, and hey! If you're Horde, this also means never having to fly an ugly-ass wyvern! Reason enough for me to level engineering on my tauren warrior.
- Turbo-Charged Flying Machine (engineers only) The epic version requires a hell of a lot more time, if for no other reason than the need for eight Khorium Power Cores. The problem with Khorium Power Cores is that they need -- wait for it -- Khorium, and this is a rare spawn that can pop up on any given Outland mining node. With Outland depopulated since the end of The Burning Crusade, you'll often find yourself alone in a zone flying from one node to the next hoping against hope that some damn Khorium will spawn. While you can check the auction house and occasionally Qiff in Netherstorm's Area 52, you may not have much luck on a small to medium server, and the little Khorium you'll find there tends to be expensive as hell.
- Mechano-Hog (Horde)/Mekgineer's Chopper (Alliance) WoW's own motorbikes! I still remember when these were introduced in the Wrath of the Lich King beta. But you know how the Vial's so expensive because of a non-negotiable materials cost? Well, the motorbikes are what that was patterned on. Titansteel's cheaper than it used to be (then again, how could it not be compared to the opening days of Wrath?), but the Salvaged Iron Golem Parts are 3,000 gold, the Goblin-Machined Pistons (eight of them!) are 1,000 gold each, and the Elementium-Plated Exhaust Pipe is 1,500 gold. Oh, and they're also only available from a vendor in the Storm Peaks' K3, unless your engineer gets lucky and "skins" them off mobs in Ulduar. Yes folks, it's a gold sink, but judging from the number of them infesting the average server, it's an effective one. Also the subject of the achievement Get to the Choppa!
There is one mount theoretically available from fishing, although you couldn't prove it by me:
- Sea Turtle Ye gods. Yet another horribly random fishing drop that eludes yours truly. Oh well, it's not like Blizzard hasn't given me another crack at it. Once available only as a very random drop (El's Extreme Anglin' pegs it as 1 in 2,000 to 1 in 5,000) from any Northrend pool, its availability has been expanded to all pools in Azeroth's Cataclysm zones as well, including Tol Barad. Getting this is often best combined with One That Didn't Get Away so that you're making yourself miserable for the purpose of multiple achievements rather than just one. However, as someone who fished up umpteen million Fangtooth Herring in Wrath without once seeing either a Dark Herring or a turtle, it's also possible that you'll make yourself miserable for the purpose of no achievements. Bitch, bitch. Moan, moan. Also the subject of the achievement Turtles All the Way Down.
There are no mounts available from inscription.
Jewelcrafting
There are no mounts available from jewelcrafting.
Leatherworking
There are no mounts available from leatherworking.
Tailoring
There are three mounts available from tailoring and, like their flying engineering counterparts, they're tailors-only:
- Flying Carpet (tailors only) Like the standard-issue Flying Machine for engineers, this is a fairly easy starter flying mount to make if you've been keeping up with your professions when you reach Outland. The flying carpet mounts were famous for a period in Wrath for situating character models right in the middle of them -- by which I mean half on top and half below -- leading to a rash of people who appeared to have been eaten by ambulatory rugs. Curiously enough, this also wound up being an issue with the stone drake models when Cataclysm went live. I wonder if the issue was caused by the same errant bit of code.
- Magnificent Flying Carpet (tailors only) Like the Frosty Carpet below, this was originally intended as the epic flying counterpart to the Flying Carpet, but it's trainable and has a much cheaper materials cost.
- Frosty Flying Carpet (tailors only) Whenever I see one of these (well, the carpet mounts more generally), I'm immediately transported to that memorable night in Sunwell when our raid leader was chewing us out over our abysmal performance on what was supposed to be farm content. After a particularly appalling series of wipes on the Twins, he paused to catch his breath between (accurate) denunciations of our performance when we all heard a tinny little voice over Vent. Turns out our DPS warrior had leaned back from his computer and was quietly singing A Whole New World to himself. The raid never really recovered that evening. What does this have to do with the Frosty Flying Carpet? Absolutely nothing.
Working on achievements? The Overachiever is here to help! Count on us for advice on Azeroth's holidays and special events, including new achievements, how to get 310% flight speed with achievement mounts, and Cataclysm reputation factions and achievements.
Filed under: Achievements, The Overachiever
Patch 5.2 interview with Dave Kosak
Inside an old alt's vault
The latest patch 5.2 news
All of the latest Mists of Pandaria news





Reader Comments (Page 4 of 6)
Tempes Magus Jun 3rd 2011 7:42AM
"On the other hand, there are many different companies that do the same sort of thing. In the UK (don't know about other regions), most telephone companies ask you to pay line rental (you don't own the line), and then offer "extras" like Broadband or whatever other Services, like paying for individual calls."
Those are all services, paying for time, not for a product.
Paying for WoW content is like paying for phone lines and then paying to rent them despite already owning them.
Paying for WoW content and then service is like paying a rental agency so you can rent your own car you have owned and paid off.
If it's a product then they shouldn't be charging for "time to use the content".
If it's a service then they shouldn't be charging for content that you can't actually own.
They need to decide whether they want to sell a service or a product and stop charging for the content or allow people to use the content without a subscription somehow, offline is easiest.
They can't legally make you rent what you already paid for.
Arrohon Jun 3rd 2011 7:45AM
"An "upgrade" is still a product that has to be usable without any extra purchase or it can't be sold alone."
Okay let's pretend that there is no subscription and you can play offline. You buy Cataclysm but you still need to go online once to register the game. Blizzard then noticed that you only bought Cataclysm. You didn't buy Vanilla, BC, or Wrath. Oops. You can't play because you only bought the expansion or upgrade. Plenty of single-player games do this too. Dragon Age: Awakening is sold separately but requires Dragon Age: Origins to play. Not to mention that WC2, WC3, SC, SC2, and Diablo 2 all do this as well.
Tempes Magus Jun 3rd 2011 7:50AM
@cyenea85
And yet you can't prove me wrong. Everything you say you completely say backwards so that it supports me.
Hell, you just wrote a single line saying "you don't understand those words" and didn't even tell me the correct definitions or anything else.
Do you rent your computer?
Did you pay a one-time price for it?
Did you buy Windows 7 or Mac OS X?
Do you rent Windows or Mac OS?
You don't rent your computer's operating system and yet you can use it.
So, how can you purchase the expansion disc software and not be able to use it on your own computer?
They can't legally sell a disc of software that we are unable to use. They have to provide use of it for free, at least for a reasonable amount of time if nothing else.
They have to include game time with every content purchase, or let us use it offline without using their servers(justifying not having a subscription), or they are breaking the law by not providing us what we paid for, thus technically stealing at least some money from us.
Any amount of money I pay for anything has to gain me, in return, exactly what I paid for or it is illegal.
If I can't use the Celestial Steed without game time then they need to provide time with the steed under the same single payment or they need to let me use it without game time, meaning offline.
If they can't provide me with what I paid for, every cent worth, then it is illegal.
I'm sick of repeating myself and these simple concepts. I'm going to sleep. If you want to refute what I said, go ahead, but at least do it intelligently and prove it.
Tempes Magus Jun 3rd 2011 7:57AM
"Okay let's pretend that there is no subscription and you can play offline. You buy Cataclysm but you still need to go online once to register the game. Blizzard then noticed that you only bought Cataclysm. You didn't buy Vanilla, BC, or Wrath."
1) I own everything.
2) I'm not talking about my internet payment. I'm talking about the WoW subscription. cyenea85 already got confused about that for some dumb reason.
It doesn't matter what content I purchased. I still have to be able to use it or I do not own it and thus they illegally charged me for it.
The original box is perfectly legal because it contained a single month of tiem under the single payment for content and time.
Every other piece of content is being illegally sold because it does not include time to use it and can't be used offline.
I really don't see why they can't let us play WoW offline, using none of their servers and costing them absolutely nothing.
All this trouble could easily be rectified and could have been avoided.
They could have just included at least 2 weeks of time with every purchase, the length of a free trial, or let us play offline.
It's so stupid that I even have to start this discussion, but I have to. It's not legal and it's not morally correct either.
I really need to sleep so I'm leaving the discussion.
cyanea85 Jun 3rd 2011 8:01AM
Good luck on your lawsuit, sweetie. Make sure you tell us how it goes for you.
Tempes Magus Jun 3rd 2011 8:04AM
Edit:
"The original box is perfectly legal because it contained a single month of tiem under the single payment for content and time."
It's essentially $60 for the first month of time, perfectly legal that way.
Everything else is just a charge for content, no time to use it, and thus illegal because I can't use the content and don't actually own it.
They have to give time to use the content under the one price, thus legally saying "$60 for a month and the new expansion for free" or "$40 for a month and this new mount for free" to get away with the "service" categorization of WoW, or let us use it offline to justify "ownership".
That's the problem.
A "service" can't charge for content separate from the service and unusable without the service, but it can charge for time and give content away for free(even if only clever wording).
A "product", however, has to be usable without a "service", but can have "server access fee" for online play so long as it is playable offline.
If WoW wants to keep the subscription, it needs to allow offline play or stop charging for all content, no matter how small.
That is the only way to be legal.
Bye......zzzzzzzz
sayling Jun 3rd 2011 9:31AM
@Tempes
You can't buy the mount(s) unless you have a battle.net account, I believe?
All expansion packs clearly, I believe, state that the original game is required - which, when purchased, came with some free game time (though I'm not sure there's any 'legal' requirement for said game time to be included, it would seem daft not to do so) - so there's your free online service subscription time.
So each expansion pack is, effectively, an upgrade. Like when you buy Office 2010, for example, which can come in two flavours:
1) Full retail price for the whole thing
2) Cheaper upgrade price, for when you have a previous version of Office, say 2003 or 2007.
To turn that into wow/blizz speak, substitute Cata for Office 2010, Wrath for 2007 and BC for 2003.
There are many instances of things being sold - and/or licensed for use - that require something else to already be installed or purchased. And they /can/ be purchased separately, but they won't work. Things like covers for phones, chargers for electrical items - hell, even electrical items themselves (eg I could walk into any electricity supply company's shop and buy one of their products, but if I didn't have any electrical supply, I couldn't use it...)
But that's not the case with mounts - at least as far as I can tell. You can't buy one without a battle.net account, so you couldn't buy one unless you could use it, and you can only use it when you have plugged it in (entered the correct code) and switched it on (connected to the servers).
As for cell/mobile phones - I can buy many, many SIM-free phones, from very cheap to arm and a leg expensive. But it's just a paperweight until I sign up to a phone service provider.
Hob Jun 3rd 2011 10:54AM
@Tempes
In the real world, I'm an academic librarian. The "pay for content" + "pay for subscription" model is pretty much how everything works in most libraries. For example, we subscribe to an ebook service for an annual fee. We also "buy" ebooks, which are ours forever. But we can only access those ebooks as long as we continue paying the annual fee to the ebook service.
Another example: in universities (especially research universities), professors are expected to publish original research in professional journals. Many of these journals are available for annual subscriptions that run in the thousands or tens of thousands of dollars per year. Because publication often transfers copyright to the publisher, the professor is unable to use his or her own work without the library purchasing a subscription to that journal. So that's an example of someone creating content, but they have to license it back.
Anyway, I suspect there are many other real world examples of "purchasing" something that you can't use without a subscription. I don't have a cell phone, so feel free to correct me if I'm wrong (not being sarcastic, being serious), but I'm pretty sure you pay for apps, which you can only use if you've got air time. And apps aren't required to use a cell phone, but they are convenient.
nikdaheratik Jun 3rd 2011 1:26PM
OMFG, why are you wasting so much of your own time on a losing issue. You not only do not understand the legal questions, you also don't understand the software questions. What you are asking is basically like asking Netflix to allow you to stream videos to your computer offline. It doesn't work because in order to "stream" them, you have to be online.
Just like WoW doesn't work offline because the game world only exists on their servers. Even private servers don't work the same as the actual game servers for things that aren't dead simple because the scripts to run boss fights, for example, do not exist outside of blizzards servers.
What I really don't understand is why you think
nikdaheratik Jun 3rd 2011 1:28PM
What I really don't understand is why you think $0.50 a day for a service is worth all of this drama. It's stupid and childish.
Fletcher Jun 3rd 2011 5:10AM
Yes, I paid $25 USD for the Winged Guardian. Yes, that's real money in addition to my subscription fee. Yes, I am not a unique snowflake and I do not get bragging rights.
But I have a giant armoured flying cat with flaming wings, therefore your argument is invalid.
cyanea85 Jun 3rd 2011 5:23AM
You use these words like "legal" and "criminal"...
I'm not sure you know what they mean.
Tempes Magus Jun 3rd 2011 5:27AM
@Fletcher
What si your point?
I'm not arguing against those mounts or anything else.
I'm not arguing against paying for content.
I'm not arguing against paying the subscription.
I'm just arguing against paying for content that I can't even use without paying additional money for the subscription.
Meaning: I should get at least some free time to use each piece of content that I pay for, or I should be able to use all content, that I paid for, offline, with a reasonable "server access fee" to get online.
I thought I made this simple to understand.
I like WoW, a lot. I want to pay to support it. I just don't want to pay twice for one thing, for the product and then the ability to use it.
I want to pay once, even if I have to pay more, because I need it to be legal and clear and not an obvious trick.
cyanea85 Jun 3rd 2011 5:34AM
How are you posting right now? Are you on your own internet connection? You paid an installation fee/set up fee/equipment fee and you still have to pay month after month for access to the content (IE: The internet). Isn't that "illegal" using your...confused definition of the word?
Paying an initial fee for something, and then paying a monthly fee to continue to access it isn't something that the video game industry invented. If you're going off on a Crusade against it, make sure you cancel your internet, television, and cellphone service first or you'll be pretty hilariously hypocritical.
Tempes Magus Jun 3rd 2011 5:34AM
@cyanea85
"You use these words like "legal" and "criminal"...
I'm not sure you know what they mean."
Then tell me?
How is selling content, for real dollars and then not allowing a customer to use that content, not illegal?
How is that different from finding a person's dog wandering the streets, a dog they own, and commanding a reward before you return it?
Isn't that called holding the dog for ransom? Isn't that illegal?
What does paying for content even mean?
Do you own that content?
Do you own the right to play it?
What does paying for content give you?
What does it give you if you can't use it until you pay for "time" to be allowed to use it?
Why do you need to be "allowed" to use a purchase that you already paid fully for?
How is it legal when they require another sum of money before you can use what you already paid a sum of money for?
What did you pay money for if you have nothing to show for it?
Explain to me how I am wrong.
Please discuss this civilly and make me understand what you apparently know for sure.
I want to know the complete truth if I don't already know it.
Tempes Magus Jun 3rd 2011 5:41AM
@cyenea85
"How are you posting right now? Are you on your own internet connection? You paid an installation fee/set up fee/equipment fee and you still have to pay month after month for access to the content (IE: The internet). Isn't that "illegal" using your...confused definition of the word?"
HUH?
Am I paying for each individual website or are websites free under the "internet access fee"?
You just supported my argument AGAIN!
Do you even know what you posted?????
I pay for "internet SERVICE" which gets me FREE access to all websites that I go to.
Is the game a service where all content is free, like the internet? No!
Please reread your comments before contradicting yourself.
cyanea85 Jun 3rd 2011 5:41AM
Fine.
I'm bored. It's late. You're an idiot.
Your argument is very similar to the one Glider used in its case against Blizzard. This was the ruling: "Blizzard owns a valid copyright in the game client software, Blizzard has granted a limited license for WoW players to use the software,"
Key words in that sentence? BLIZZARD HAS GRANTED A LIMITED LICENSE FOR WOW PLAYERS TO -USE- THE SOFTWARE.
When you purchase WoW, you down OWN the content. You are purchasing the rights to USE IT.
From WoW's own EULA: "All rights and title in and to the Service (including without limitation any user accounts, titles, computer code, themes, objects, characters, character names, stories, dialogue, catch phrases, locations, concepts, artwork, animations, sounds, musical compositions, audio-visual effects, methods of operation, moral rights, any related documentation, “applets,” transcripts of the chat rooms, character profile information, recordings of games) are owned by Blizzard or its licensors. The Game and the Service are protected by United States and international laws, and may contain certain licensed materials in which Blizzard’s licensors may enforce their rights in the event of any violation of this Agreement. "
TL;DR: WoW is a service. You are paying for the service, much in the same way you pay for cellphone service or internet service. You are NOT paying for the content. You do not own the content.
If you need even more clarification, again from the EULA. Caps are their's, not mine:
NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING TO THE CONTRARY HEREIN, YOU ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT YOU SHALL HAVE NO OWNERSHIP OR OTHER PROPERTY INTEREST IN ANY ACCOUNT STORED OR HOSTED ON A BLIZZARD SYSTEM, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION ANY BNET ACCOUNT OR WORLD OF WARCRAFT ACCOUNT, AND YOU FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT ALL RIGHTS IN AND TO SUCH ACCOUNTS ARE AND SHALL FOREVER BE OWNED BY AND INURE TO THE BENEFIT OF BLIZZARD.
In short: Buying the box grants you a LICENSE TO PLAY. It doesn't grant you ownership of jack squat.
cyanea85 Jun 3rd 2011 5:44AM
As part of the agreement you make with Blizzard when you purchase the license to play, you agree to pay 15/mo to continue to use it. That's the terms of the contract you agree to when you create an account. Does it suck? Yes. Is it legal? Yes.
Tempes Magus Jun 3rd 2011 5:46AM
"Key words in that sentence? BLIZZARD HAS GRANTED A LIMITED LICENSE FOR WOW PLAYERS TO -USE- THE SOFTWARE."
How come I can't play WoW right now then? Why can't I use my Celestial Steed right now?
Why can't I at least use it OFFLINE?????
They gave me no "license to USE" anything. I pay the price for the content and I must pay $15 per month to use it.
There is no USE without subscribing despite the fact that I paid damn good money for the content.
I paid for the game so I deserve to play it; I bought the right!!
Why can't I play it OFFLINE??
They wouldn't have any server costs if I played offline so there wouldn't be any need for a "server access fee"(a.k.a. subscription).
Why can't I play content I paid money for OFFLINE??
Have you got that through your contradictory idiotic skull?
cyanea85 Jun 3rd 2011 5:54AM
I'm beginning to think you're just a troll, because there is nobody this mindblowingly retarded.
You purchase the right to play the game ACCORDING TO BLIZZARD'S TERMS. If Blizzard says that you can't play "the Service" offline, then guess what? No offline service.
The same for the mounts: You are purchasing the license to use the content. Blizzard still owns every single Celestial Steed, Winged Guardian, and Lil' KT it sold, and unless you access the content which you have a license for in the way that they decree (as in, online)...you can't use it.