The OverAchiever: Mountain O' Mounts from professions

There are a number of interesting (and by interesting, perhaps I mean "occasionally very expensive and likely to drive you insane via RNG-laden accessibility") mounts available from professions, though for some of them, you'll have to be a practitioner in good standing before you'll ever be able to learn them.
Regrettably, I am the bearer of some very bad news this week concerning the Vial of the Sands for all those of you who like circumventing the highest costs in the game.
Also read:
- Combining The Ambassador and Mountain O' Mounts
- Mountain O' Mounts in Outland
- Mountain O' Mounts in Northrend
- Mountain O' Mounts in 5-man dungeons
- Mountain O' Mounts in raids
- Mountain O' Mounts from achievements
- Mountain O' Mounts from PvP
Alchemy
There's one mount available from alchemy, but you're if the alchemist in question, you'll have to spend a fairish amount of time involved with high-level (450+) archaeology as well. If you're not an alchemist, you can buy it off a player because the Vial of the Sands is BoE, albeit a very expensive BoE.
- Sandstone Drake You're going to spend an awful lot of time digging up tol'vir artifacts for a shot at the recipe for this bad boy, but I have to admit that I really liked the implementation of the Vial of the Sands all the same. Granted, we started off with an absolutely atrocious amount of RNG involved in getting this, which has been ameliorated somewhat, but how can you not love the idea of digging up a thousand-year-old alchemical recipe from a jar buried in an ancient desert city? Anyway, the recipe's available as a random drop from Canopic Jars, which you'll find alongside tol'vir artifact fragments. Most of the time, the jars will contain Mummified Organs (oh, eww), but eventually you'll hit pay dirt and the get the Vial recipe. However, creating an actual Vial is a hugely expensive undertaking. Even if you're an herbalist/fisherman and can easily afford to create the eight Flask of the Winds, Flask of Titanic Strength, and Deepstone Oil necessary, you'll still have to blow your daily Truegold transmute 12 times (or buy it off others) and shell out for the non-negotiable, 5,000-gold Pyrium-Laced Crystalline Vial and the 3,000-gold Sands of Time (eight of them!). It used to be possible to save yourself something like 8,000 gold by running a goblin character out to Yasmin (the seller) in Uldum to take advantage of Best Deals Anywhere and the guild perk Bartering, but Blizzard seems to have hotfixed that happy little trick out of existence just a few days ago. Sorry, folks.
Archaeology
There are two mounts available from archaeology (three if you count the Vial of the Sands required for the Sandstone Drake above):
- Fossilized Raptor This one's relatively easy to get and will probably pop up before too long if you consistently work on fossil artifacts. Judging from comments on both Wowhead and the forums, most people seem to get it around 200-250 archaeology skill, but as with just about everything else concerning archaeology, don't bank on it. You might get it as early as 100, but you also might find yourself putting multiple copies of gray artifacts together at 525 before it finally pops up. That's rare, but it can happen. Console yourself by saying that everyone has at least one nightmare artifact eluding their grasp in archaeology.
- Ultramarine Qiraji Battle Tank This one's statistically more likely to be that nightmare. Like the Vial of the Sands, the Qiraji Battle Tank -- or, more accurately, the Scepter of Azj'Aqir that summons it -- is a tol'vir archaeology item, which means you're not going to get a shot at it until 450 skill at the earliest. You'll find some people on Wowhead with horror stories about having thousands upon thousands of useless night elf and fossil artifact fragments by the time they work their way through the tol'vir rares, but as far as I recall, the situation was improved by Blizzard's hotfixing an increase to the number of tol'vir spawns in Kalimdor. Is it worth it? This is the only qiraji bug mount available outside of the Temple of Ahn'Qiraj raid unless you're one of the extraordinarily few players with the Black Qiraji Resonating Crystal, so my answer is yes.
There are no mounts available from blacksmithing.
Enchanting
There are no mounts available from enchanting, but there are faction-specific pets as of Cataclysm. We'll cover this in a later guide to the new pet achievements we talked about in The OverAchiever: New achievements in patch 4.2.
Engineering
There are three mounts available from engineering, but beware: Neither of the two flying machines can be learned by non-engineers, and the motorbikes are both very expensive (though less so than the Vial, above).
- Flying Machine (engineers only) The Flying Machine is actually pretty easy to build for an engineer fresh to Hellfire Peninsula, provided you've been keeping up on your profession leveling. You'll have to mine up a ton of Fel Iron for the various materials, but nodes are plentiful in Hellfire and Zangarmarsh. Assuming you can get your hands on enough, this is an absurdly cheap mount to build, and hey! If you're Horde, this also means never having to fly an ugly-ass wyvern! Reason enough for me to level engineering on my tauren warrior.
- Turbo-Charged Flying Machine (engineers only) The epic version requires a hell of a lot more time, if for no other reason than the need for eight Khorium Power Cores. The problem with Khorium Power Cores is that they need -- wait for it -- Khorium, and this is a rare spawn that can pop up on any given Outland mining node. With Outland depopulated since the end of The Burning Crusade, you'll often find yourself alone in a zone flying from one node to the next hoping against hope that some damn Khorium will spawn. While you can check the auction house and occasionally Qiff in Netherstorm's Area 52, you may not have much luck on a small to medium server, and the little Khorium you'll find there tends to be expensive as hell.
- Mechano-Hog (Horde)/Mekgineer's Chopper (Alliance) WoW's own motorbikes! I still remember when these were introduced in the Wrath of the Lich King beta. But you know how the Vial's so expensive because of a non-negotiable materials cost? Well, the motorbikes are what that was patterned on. Titansteel's cheaper than it used to be (then again, how could it not be compared to the opening days of Wrath?), but the Salvaged Iron Golem Parts are 3,000 gold, the Goblin-Machined Pistons (eight of them!) are 1,000 gold each, and the Elementium-Plated Exhaust Pipe is 1,500 gold. Oh, and they're also only available from a vendor in the Storm Peaks' K3, unless your engineer gets lucky and "skins" them off mobs in Ulduar. Yes folks, it's a gold sink, but judging from the number of them infesting the average server, it's an effective one. Also the subject of the achievement Get to the Choppa!
There is one mount theoretically available from fishing, although you couldn't prove it by me:
- Sea Turtle Ye gods. Yet another horribly random fishing drop that eludes yours truly. Oh well, it's not like Blizzard hasn't given me another crack at it. Once available only as a very random drop (El's Extreme Anglin' pegs it as 1 in 2,000 to 1 in 5,000) from any Northrend pool, its availability has been expanded to all pools in Azeroth's Cataclysm zones as well, including Tol Barad. Getting this is often best combined with One That Didn't Get Away so that you're making yourself miserable for the purpose of multiple achievements rather than just one. However, as someone who fished up umpteen million Fangtooth Herring in Wrath without once seeing either a Dark Herring or a turtle, it's also possible that you'll make yourself miserable for the purpose of no achievements. Bitch, bitch. Moan, moan. Also the subject of the achievement Turtles All the Way Down.
There are no mounts available from inscription.
Jewelcrafting
There are no mounts available from jewelcrafting.
Leatherworking
There are no mounts available from leatherworking.
Tailoring
There are three mounts available from tailoring and, like their flying engineering counterparts, they're tailors-only:
- Flying Carpet (tailors only) Like the standard-issue Flying Machine for engineers, this is a fairly easy starter flying mount to make if you've been keeping up with your professions when you reach Outland. The flying carpet mounts were famous for a period in Wrath for situating character models right in the middle of them -- by which I mean half on top and half below -- leading to a rash of people who appeared to have been eaten by ambulatory rugs. Curiously enough, this also wound up being an issue with the stone drake models when Cataclysm went live. I wonder if the issue was caused by the same errant bit of code.
- Magnificent Flying Carpet (tailors only) Like the Frosty Carpet below, this was originally intended as the epic flying counterpart to the Flying Carpet, but it's trainable and has a much cheaper materials cost.
- Frosty Flying Carpet (tailors only) Whenever I see one of these (well, the carpet mounts more generally), I'm immediately transported to that memorable night in Sunwell when our raid leader was chewing us out over our abysmal performance on what was supposed to be farm content. After a particularly appalling series of wipes on the Twins, he paused to catch his breath between (accurate) denunciations of our performance when we all heard a tinny little voice over Vent. Turns out our DPS warrior had leaned back from his computer and was quietly singing A Whole New World to himself. The raid never really recovered that evening. What does this have to do with the Frosty Flying Carpet? Absolutely nothing.
Working on achievements? The Overachiever is here to help! Count on us for advice on Azeroth's holidays and special events, including new achievements, how to get 310% flight speed with achievement mounts, and Cataclysm reputation factions and achievements.
Filed under: Achievements, The Overachiever
Patch 5.3 interview with Ghostcrawler
Mystery of the Unborn Val'kyr
The latest patch 5.3 news
All of the latest Mists of Pandaria news





Reader Comments (Page 5 of 6)
Tempes Magus Jun 3rd 2011 5:58AM
"TL;DR: WoW is a service. You are paying for the service, much in the same way you pay for cellphone service"
Well, why do I pay for the game content then if it is a "service"?
Cellphone plans offer free phones, even the "pay as you go"/prepaid plans come with free phones(or the phones come with prepaid plans).
Internet service doesn't charge for websites. Websites are free to access under the subscription, as many as I want.
Is WoW a "service" or a "product"?
Do I only pay for "content" or only for "time"?
Why must I pay for the product and the time to use it if it is a "service"? Why can't I use the "product" offline and then pay for "online service"?
My question is how the hell can I use the Cataclysm expansion without paying $15 more?
I paid $60, real valid actual MONEY, so why can I not play it OFFLINE?????????????????
Give me a damn good reason why I have to pay an extra $15 just for basic usage of the product after already paying for ownership of the product?
Why am I FORCED TO SUBSCRIBE in order to USE MY $60 OF CONTENT???
Why can't I use it alone OFFLINE under that $60 price?
What did I pay for if I have nothing usable for that $60?
I have to pay an extra $15, that wasn't part of the original price, just to use the product???
That si what is ILLEGAL!!!
If I pay for a product I better damn well get something usable for the price I paid.
Requiring me to pay more before I can use it, since I already paid before, is illegal!!!
"YOU MUST SUBSCRIBE IN ORDER TO USE YOUR PURCHASE!"
WTF?! I already paid you money so give me my damn product!
What is legal about that?
cyanea85 Jun 3rd 2011 5:59AM
In short: You don't own any of WoW. You don't own your character, you don't own Darkshore, and you don't own that pet you bought from the Tournament. You don't own any part of WoW, regardless of how much money you paid in the store for it. You can have purchased sixteen different copies of the game. Guess what? You still don't own anything.
So if you don't want to pay your 15/mo to continue paying for your right to use the software, then you're shit outta luck.
Tempes Magus Jun 3rd 2011 6:07AM
"I'm beginning to think you're just a troll, because there is nobody this mindblowingly retarded.
1) You're insulting me so who looks stupid?
2) Have you seen your posts?
You seem to think that websites charge admission after you pay the internet service fee.
3) You won't even read my comments fully before posting so how ca you even know what they say? If you read this then say banana to prove it.
4) "offline service"
Offline isn't a service you idiot!!
Offline requires NO SERVICE!
It doesn't cost them a damn penny to let me play the $60 game I bought offline because I wouldn't be using the damn servers.
IDIOT!
Go ahead and rate me down. I don't care. I'm not going to feed the idiot troll who contradicts himself and is either rating me down all on his own or other idiots blidnly accept what he says as "gospel truth".
I'm done trying to make the idiot fix his contradictory posts that had a hope of refuting me if they said what he thought they said.
Tempes Magus Jun 3rd 2011 6:12AM
@cyenea85, last reply. If you don't understand this and the light doesn't come on then nobody is home and I'm absolutely through arguing with somebody who doesn't even have a brain, a person who goes by cyena85 here.
"In short: You don't own any of WoW. You don't own your character, you don't own Darkshore, and you don't own that pet you bought from the Tournament. You don't own any part of WoW, regardless of how much money you paid in the store for it."
Ok, so why did I pay money for that content?
What did I pay for?
So why did I pay money for that content?
What did I pay for?
What did I pay for?
What did I pay for?
What did I pay for?
What did I pay for?
What did I pay for?
What did I pay for?
What did I pay for?
What did I pay for?
If I can't use any content, and it was all digital, what did I pay for?
I have no box, no CD, no DVD, no manual, nothing, so what did I get in return?
What did I pay for??
cyanea85 Jun 3rd 2011 6:19AM
"1) You're insulting me so who looks stupid?"
To put it bluntly, you started it.
"2) Have you seen your posts?
You seem to think that websites charge admission after you pay the internet service fee."
That's not what I said. I said that you have to continue to pay a service fee to get online after paying an initial setup fee. You can't not pay the service fee and continue to be allowed access to the content (in this case, the internet).
"3) You won't even read my comments fully before posting so how ca you even know what they say? If you read this then say banana to prove it."
Banana.
"4) "offline service"
Offline isn't a service you idiot!!
Offline requires NO SERVICE!
It doesn't cost them a damn penny to let me play the $60 game I bought offline because I wouldn't be using the damn servers.
IDIOT!"
What I said was "no offline service". WoW is a service. So in this case, what I meant was "No offline WoW." If you read my posts in their entirety and took a minute to comprehend them before banging angrily on your keyboard in response, you would understand that that's what I mean.
It doesn't cost them a penny, but that doesn't matter. They've said "No offline WoW" and since they said it and you don't own it, you have to live with what they said. (Completely ignoring the fact that it would probably take an extensive amount of coding and writing to make the game work offline. Every interaction, from talking to an NPC and accepting a quest, to casting a spell is reliant on the servers to make it happen. Only the art, music, and stuff is on your computer. All the actual work happens on the servers. What you run is really nothing more than a client designed to talk to the servers, display to you what the server says and send your information to it.)
"I'm done trying to make the idiot fix his contradictory posts that had a hope of refuting me if they said what he thought they said."
Aww. I'm having so much fuuuuun~
cyanea85 Jun 3rd 2011 6:20AM
*sigh*
"What did I pay for?"
I answered that a few comments up. Who's not reading whose responses now?
When you bought the game, you paid for the license to play it.
Tempes Magus Jun 3rd 2011 6:31AM
very last reply:
"What I said was "no offline service". WoW is a service. So in this case, what I meant was "No offline WoW.""
Ok, I agree.
Now, why do they charge for the content if it is a service?
Why not just charge for the service without the content price?
Why sell content that includes no month of time, thus no service?
How is it legal to sell content that nobody can use until they buy a service?
Let's use you "movie and popcorn" analogy:
I go to the movie. I pay for the movie ticket. I decide to buy popcorn.
What if I didn't buy a movie ticket and just bought popcorn?
Would they charge me for the movie ticket just so I could eat the popcorn, or would they take the popcorn I legally paid for away from me?
No, they would let me take the popcorn and eat it even if I don't buy a ticket.
Charging for the WoW content, you know the box price or download price, is like buying popcorn that you aren't allowed to eat until you buy the movie ticket.
Does that make sense now?
How can it be legal to charge for anything that you are not actually allowed to have/use/own/do anything with?
We're forced to subscribe or that $60 expansion is absolutely worthless.
That's illegal because I paid them money for that content, otherwise why did they charge?
They can't take my money and give me nothing in return. I have to get something in return or they are just scamming me and stealing my money.
Read my words and see the common sense.
This is simple English.
I'm saying "they ripped me off by charging for Cataclysm because I can't use it without going and paying for something completely different, another product they sell called time, but why didn't they include some 'time' with the expansion?".
If I can't use a product without paying a price that was not included then it is illegal.
If they made expansions cost $75 and include one month of game time then I would be FINE with it.
If they made the Celestial Steed and Winged Guardian each $40 then I would be FINE with it.
I would be FINE because then the products would be legal since I could use them for at least one month without being forced into another separate purchase.
The problem with selling content is the separate purchase required to USE it.
It either has to be included or there must not be a separate purchase in some other way, like no subscription.
If this is not clear enough, especially with the large spaces to make it easier to break into tiny-mind chunks, then you are the dumbest person on Earth.
cyanea85 Jun 3rd 2011 6:45AM
"How is it legal to sell content that nobody can use until they buy a service?"
Again, for the fifteenth time: they're not selling content. You're not buying content. You're buying ACCESS to the content through the service that is WoW. You don't own anything after buying the license, just the right to play...a right that is contingent on you continuing to pay. If you don't like these terms, then click No when you have to accept the EULA and Terms of Service before playing. But those are the terms. Is it "nice" to charge you for the box and then per month? No...it's not nice. But Blizz is a business and businesses like to make money...and they're doing it in a legal way. If you don't like it, see above.
"Let's use you "movie and popcorn" analogy:"
Let's not because A: It's not mine, and B: It doesn't even make sense. (not to mention the fact that I've never been in a movie theater that let you in the front door, let alone to the concession stand without buying a ticket first)
"That's illegal because I paid them money for that content, otherwise why did they charge?"
License. Again.
"If they made expansions cost $75 and include one month of game time then I would be FINE with it."
But you're not fine with giving them sixty dollars and then another fifteen.
"The problem with selling content"
Not. Selling. Contennnnnt~
"very last reply:"
Somehow, I doubt that.
Tempes Magus Jun 3rd 2011 6:53AM
"Again, for the fifteenth time: they're not selling content."
WHAT THE HELL COST ME 60 GODDAMN DOLLARS IN THE STORE THEN????????????
I bought Cataclysm for $60 and it had no game time.
Is that NOT selling content?
IDIOT!!
cyanea85 Jun 3rd 2011 6:56AM
You paid for the license...you know what.
This isn't even fun anymore.
If you're a troll, you're a pretty bad one. If not...well...
Bet ya five bucks that that wasn't your last post either.
Arrohon Jun 3rd 2011 7:12AM
You own the box and the software. Blizzard owns the ability and right to let you "use" the software. Also if you think that Blizzard is the only one that is making people pay for both a game and the right to use said game you are wrong. It is a common practice of the MMO franchise albeit it is becoming less common with more MMOs going F2P. You also seem to be forgetting that Blizzard is first and foremost a business. What fun would WoW be offline anyway? It isn't called a MMORPG for nothing. You would be able to do nothing but lvl and do tradeskills.... sounds boring. It would also have to be a character you can only play offline too. All WoW characters are stored on the servers. You have to access the server to access your character and accessing the server requires the internet. WoW offline would be boring and separate from the online experience. Who knows how much space a single character takes on a hard drive anyway? I doubt that Blizzard is charging $25 to move only 5MB. If you really want to be able to play offline then maybe Titan will have that. WoW is simply too old to make such a drastic change that honestly is unnecessary.
Tempes Magus Jun 3rd 2011 7:20AM
"You paid for the license...you know what. "
I didn't pay for the license. The $15 subscription is for the license.
You seem to forget that WoW has 2 prices.
There are the "server access fees", which is the subscription, and the "content fees", which are box prices and cash shop prices.
"Server access fees" are for "server access". "Content fees" are for "content".
How do you think they covered development costs originally? They used the box cost.
Now, why is "server access fees" called "server" access fees? Because, they are fees for accessing the servers.
Obviously, that doesn't cover content costs, as they often point out.
So, why are we paying "content fees" if we can't use that "content" without paying the "server access fees"?
Why not just raise the "server access fees" to ensure they cover all "content fees" and allow everyone to download the content for free so long as they pay the subscription?
If the "server access fees" are required to use what you paid the "content fees" for then why not make them a single payment?
Why the hell do they sell content separately from server access, separately from the subscription?
Now since they sell content separate from subscriptions, how can they legally justify selling content to someone without subscription time included to use that content?
Answer: It has to be illegal to sell content without selling time to use it because a product, the content, that a customer is unable to use, hasn't paid subscription and no free time, is illegal for the simple fact the customer paid for a product and got nothing in return.
The customer certainly doesn't get a full $60 worth if they can't use the content on the disc.
It's illegal to sell content, no matter how small, without including time to use it.
Therefore, the financial model WoW is using is illegal by virtue of the fact that many purchases do not include game time but have their own cost which means they must be usable.
Why do I have to rent what I already own?
If I pay money for any product, that constitutes ownership. I must get something in return.
They can't legally require purchase of a service before I can use a product I have legally obtained ownership rights of by purchasing already.
If the cost of the expansion box does not confer ownership then it is an illegal charge because I would be stealing that expansion box.
I must pay for everything in the expansion box in order to purchase it, and thus must get exactly what I paid for in return, nothing less.
If that box price covers content development costs, which is does, then I am legally entitled to using that content without a separate payment.
Now, I am not able to access the servers without paying the "server access fees" subscription, but that does not mean that I can't use the content I legally own offline.
I own the legal right to use the content so I must either have free online time included, since it can only be played online, or it must be playable offline.
WoW is selling content illegally because I am not able to use it without a second purchase despite purchasing the legal right to use it.
You're making me refine my statements and ideas even more. I am ow contemplating taking this to a lawyer and getting a huge settlement, or winning a case, because I am getting more sure that I could win it.
If they didn't sell content, without free time, then they would be perfectly legal, but they do sell content without the ability to use it making them illegal.
cyanea85 Jun 3rd 2011 7:23AM
Christ, you're stupid.
Arrohon Jun 3rd 2011 7:33AM
If you pay $60 for the box and don't pay the subscription then you bought a $60 coaster. Enjoy.
Ghost Dancer Jun 3rd 2011 8:48AM
I think all profs should get at least one mount. In particular I always thought that JC should get a mount recipe in much the same vein as the figurines - a crystal dragon or some such would be great and it fits in with the prof.
Adam Holisky Jun 3rd 2011 10:19AM
While I appreciate the spirited discussion, I'd like everyone to stay on topic and keep their tempers under control.
Legality of mounts is not on topic. Comments should add to the discussion of a subject, in this case over achiever, not subtract from it.
Hob Jun 3rd 2011 11:01AM
The Hood of the Malefic... it will be mine one day.
But until then, maybe some day leatherworkers could make "Leathery Bat Wings" as a flying mount? I'm not in a hurry to drop tailoring, but oooh... leathery bat wings on a forsaken warlock... yes, it's so right...
loop_not_defined Jun 3rd 2011 11:13AM
@Tempus Magus:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_by_verbosity
TL;DR can be a legitimate response when someone is trying to bury you with words - such as what you are doing. Bevity is the soul of wit.
erico Jun 3rd 2011 12:52PM
@Hob == WIN
@Tempes == Comedic LOSE
Maybe enchanters could make Ruby Slippers?
nikdaheratik Jun 3rd 2011 1:20PM
I think you can get a pair of those in Kara if you really want them.