Does Cataclysm have too much potential content?

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

6-05-2011 @ 3:43AM

Paul said...

In hindsight, I think it was a very questionable decision to adjust the 1-60 content as they did.

We have the lore-sequence issue now, sure, but, meh, I look back and wonder "what if" at it all.
What if 1-60 was just tidied up. Improve the flow (as they did anyway), but keep it with it's original pre-BC stories. Then, use the new stories as random daily level 85 content, slowly adding a new story as the expansion goes by. Giving us a reason to do more than sit on our arses (or fly around doing archaeology. Hey, if I'm going to do something boring, I choose that over sitting in Org/SW all day).

However, this is hindsight, and it is a wonderful thing, but ignorance is bliss, and sometimes I wish the community lived by that rule instead. Sadly, we don't.

Add your comments

Your comments:

Remember me

E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.