Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-09-2011 @ 6:03PM
Darren said...
I have to agree with Cyno a little about the nature of an MMO. Sure MMO doesn't mean "team game only", but I don't really see the point of playing a genre with a sole purpose of putting thousands of people in the same world at the same time if you don't want to interact with them. There are dozens of brilliant RPGs for those who don't like social interaction.
Not to say that I think Blizzard -shouldn't- add solo content, cause sometimes you might want a break from your guild and friends or they might not be online at the time, but it's at least a fair argument that a multiplayer game should focus on content that involves multiple players.