Shifting Perspectives: Why the tank Q&A sucked

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

6-14-2011 @ 5:52PM

llcjay2003 said...

@DragonFireKai: Well said. I've seen some people defend the devs with an argument that they are doing the Q&As out of courtesy and in their "spare" time, and that they do not have to do it at all. My answer is, if you are going to do something, do it right. If you do not have the time to do a thorough job, then simply, do not do it. If trying to meet a deadline, I would rather they delay the publish than put out crap like this last one.

What boggles me is that the person(s) who publish the Q&As must have some sort of editor or QA they run drafts by. This means that more than one person (probably multiple people) read this before it was published and gave it the thumbs up.

Add your comments

Your comments:

Remember me

E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.