Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-18-2011 @ 8:20PM
Pyromelter said...
According to state of dps, fire and arcane are within 1% of each other, which is basically a negligible difference (meaning you can play whichever you are better at/enjoy more).
As far as mobility, i'm with the other guy, arcane has a short cooldown spell that hits like a slightly undercooked noodle, and presence of mind on a medium cooldown. Otherwise you're pretty much out of luck, although I like that as arcane, it really forces you to learn how to stand still and cast in the context of a lot of movement. That's the challenge of arcane more than anything. With fire, you have a dot, an instant cast, a proc instant, and a channeled spell you can spam on the run.
tl;dr - pretty much everything you assumed as fact is wrong, and the rest of the mages are kind of sitting here reading your comment going "wut?"