Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-29-2011 @ 5:24PM
Wolfbeckett said...
That monocle "controversy" sounds to me like a whole bunch of self-entitled children crying about nothing. I personally couldn't care less if Blizzard introduced a mount that cost $5000, I don't have to buy it. Bitching and moaning over completely optional cosmetic items is the epitome of childishness.
Reply
7-29-2011 @ 5:29PM
alieria said...
If you had read anything on this site/sister sites about this, it wasn't the monocles they were concerned with - it was the potential in-game 'power' that developers had discussed that they were worried about.
Try to be informed before making inane comments like that.
7-29-2011 @ 5:33PM
Wolfbeckett said...
I was replying to the article here and as such, had no need to do extra research. I don't play EVE and I don't care about EVE. If the article did not give enough information for people unfamiliar with the story to properly understand it, that's not my failing.