Skip to Content
8-11-2011 @ 6:29PM
I'll say it again: why it went to 25 as max raid size instead of 20 has never made even a lick of sense to me.15 man doesn't interest me, tbh, I'd much rather see 5/10/20.
8-11-2011 @ 7:21PM
Yeah, 25 is kind of an odd number considering it is 2.5 times the next smaller raid. it makes balancing the largest raid and the smallest raid size trickier than it should be. Right now 25s drop 3x the loot despite not being 3x larger by proportion. Drop 25 mans down to 20s and you've got the right balance.
8-11-2011 @ 10:00PM
This is so logical that it astounds me they skip 20 and went to 25 as max raid size. 5/10/20 = perfect scalingHell, they could add a 40-man raid to that for the really hardcore and it'd still be logical scaling.
First time? A confirmation email will be sent to you after submitting.
Members enter your username and password.
Enter your AOL or AIM screenname and password.
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.