Featured stories Feed
- Know Your Lore: Gul'dan, Doomhammer, and the nature of the Horde
- Totem Talk: Restoration and the Throne of Thunder, Part 4
- The Queue: No sleep till Orgrimmar
- Around Azeroth: Close encounters of the blurry kind
- Breakfast Topic: Should Blizzard brake base XP while preserving boosts for experienced players?
Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-13-2011 @ 5:17PM
Udderpowered said...
I'll cry if Alliance got ethereals and we were stuck with those bloody pandas. Cry for my wallet as I faction switch to the dark side.
Can't really see them gong for new races two expansions in a row though, diminishing returns and all that stuff.
Reply
8-13-2011 @ 9:48PM
cloudhopper013 said...
And many hordies said the same thing about worgen and goblins, that we'd be getting ripped off if we got gobbos.
Look how wrong they turned out to be. :]
8-14-2011 @ 3:59PM
Ice said...
You cant really compare worgen vs gob if ehtereals and pandas were next one..
I mean ethereals are like VOID SPACE NINJAS who leave trail of 3 images of yourself when running and fly in the air when casting.
Vs ""cute fluffy" drunken pandas"
Is there competition? Really? Reaaaally? Not to me.
Besides theres no way pandaren will be race if the name is "mists of pandaria" because why would they name whole expansion after one race that other faction cant play?
Thats like naming BC "wrath of the blood elves" and WOTLK "Humans of ebon hold" then cataclysm "Curse of gilnean worgen"?