Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-18-2011 @ 12:20PM
Blackdemon said...
Glad of a new gold sink. Players were getting a little too rich...
Reply
8-18-2011 @ 12:29PM
Dexterworgen said...
100g Transfer per item? Over my 3 or 4 toons this is going to get very expensive...
8-18-2011 @ 12:57PM
Daedalus said...
@DexterWorgen:
I think the idea, beyond simply being a gold sink, is to discourage players from just using it for extra storage of every day items. I mean, if they wanted to just give us 80 more bank slots, they could do that. They didn't, so presumably, they want some mechanism to keep players from using it that way.
My guess is, we will be able to transmogrify directly from void storage, so ultimately it should be a matter of putting something in there and leaving it there, forever.
8-18-2011 @ 1:42PM
Kar On E said...
We'll see...Blizz may keep it this high, but I would be surprised if they do, especially given the prices on Transmogrification they've shown. I'm expecting to see that number go down a good chunk before it makes it to live.
8-18-2011 @ 7:46PM
Noyou said...
1. Do you really care how much gold someone else has? I sure as hell don't. The more gold people have the less likely they are to buy it. I farm pretty much everything I need. When most people stop playing WoW good chance is that they delete or give away their gold.
2. Do you/will you care how much people put into their banks? Again, no. Rather then charge gold why not just put a transaction limit on it? Deposits should have no limit. Withdrawals could be enough for say 2 full sets per day. Something along those lines.