Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-27-2011 @ 1:10AM
Rex said...
The high tinker reminds me slightly of FDR.
The country (Gnomer) was under extreme stress from outside influences and a capable leader stepped up and pulled them out of the fire. They begged him to keep his position because he was the most capable in their eyes, but there is a key difference. Mekkatorque is not in failing health and will likely not pass away anytime soon.
Does this effect the political climate? Here we have a democracy that has turned into a meritocracy that could very easily turn into a dictatorship when a leader realizes that the only thing supporting his rule is the war to reclaim their capital. If you want to delve too deeply of course ( They didn't 'retake' the city. Only a large portion of it. The conflict goes on. Why? The leader story seemed to imply that the he would gladly give up his rule at the point when hostilities are ended, but I'm curious of his compounded sense of duty for his people. Good intentions and what not always seems to be at the root of the destruction of personal liberties).
In an effort to root out a potential dictator the Stormwind king went on a personal mission to Ironforge and assassinated many of the would-be leader's forces and 'declared' that the country be ruled by a three person council (Source - the Shattering). The Alliance can hardly be considered a League of Nations when such overt subterfuge is used to keep order (I'd like to see the wording on that Mandate..)
--Note, keeping Anduin Wrynn a political hostage might have sparked the raid, but deciding how the city/dwarven nations should be ruled seems a bit beyond the scope of his authority.