Skip to Content
9-01-2011 @ 1:09PM
Hands up everyone who saw this coming ever since Blizzard announced that worgen wouldnt have mounts.*Hand up*I just cant understand why Blizzard decided not to give mounts in the first place.It really felt like they were messing with alliance players.First they decided to balance the number of mounts on Alliance and Horde sides. Then they go ahead and screw alliance. It was just a matter of time until they flip floped on their decision once again.As for it being a horse, Gilneas is technically a Human group. It'd have to be horses. The only other possibilities would be:- Horse drawn carriage to keep in with the theme of Gilneas with the downside that it'd have to be twice the length of other mounts.- Some sort of Horse mutation that had been bitten by the worgen which really sounds weird.- A potion that gave other races the Wild Running ability which still wouldnt ballance the number of mounts since it'd be 1 unique "mount"
First time? A confirmation email will be sent to you after submitting.
Members enter your username and password.
Enter your AOL or AIM screenname and password.
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.