The Care and Feeding of Warriors: Tier 13 and the visual set for warriors, part 1

I was all set to talk about prot PVP when Blizzard went and released a preview of tier 13 for warriors. Frankly, I think it was a little cruel of them. For one thing, we now know that warriors win the gear look competition for tier 13. Sorry, everyone. If for some reason I'm right and Blizzard's going with Aspect-themed armor sets, I apologize to whatever classes get the Ysera and Alexstrasza sets.
But it's also cruel because they didn't release any specifics about the set at all. All we know is how it will look (pretty awesome) and not what it will do. What will the set bonuses be like? Are we again going to be in a position where there's no shoulder option outside of tier? These are questions that keep me up at night, people.
In the blog post that revealed our tier 13 look, there's also a visual overview of every currently existing warrior tier set. We did a big post on transmogrification a couple of weeks back, so it seems like now's a good time to start talking about that again. Rather than just throw tier at you over and over again, though, I'd like to try for something more thoughtful. With Blizzard giving us a chance to look at every set of tier gear for the class, let's talk about the cosmetic approach of the warrior over World of Warcraft's existence. This will probably take me a few weeks to get through, so I'm going to alternate it with the PVP series already in progress.
Design elements of classic World of Warcraft
Naxxramas itself was removed from World of Warcraft with the release of Wrath of the Lich King, so we can't acquire that gear any more. (The Darkmoon Faire may help with that, as far as transmogrification is concerned.) But as far as plate armor is concerned, it's worth talking about how Naxx culminated a design aesthetic for the original, level 1-to-60 release of WoW.
First off, there's a lot of armor you wore while leveling to 60. Greens and blues lasted you a lot longer (almost the whole of 1 to 60) and generally had a far more utilitarian look. To give you an idea, here is the Lionheart Helm, a crafted epic DPS plate helmet used by many preraid DPS warriors in those days. When you hear players today complaining that their gear shares models, consider that the Lionheart Helm was fundamentally the same model as 47 other helmets, not all of which were even plate. For an idea of a plate set crafted by many leveling warriors and how it looked, check out the Imperial Plate set.
The sameness of the gear made the first warrior set, the Battlegear of Valor, seem absolutely special and unique, and many players ran the dungeons necessary to gather it over and over and over again. This was back before the Dungeon Finder, when groups were entirely formed in guilds or over trade and general chat in cities. By the time its successor, the Battlegear of Heroism, appeared in the game, Molten Core was being run and some players already had their Might armor, and yet many went back for the Heroism just due to its iconic role in defining the warrior class. Heroism was also unique in that half of the set was good for tanking, while the other pieces in the set were aimed at a DPS role.

The message was clear: Warrior tanks were the real deal, DPS plate was for both warriors and paladins, and neither was going to look particularly good in it. This paucity of gear left DPS warriors wearing blues, going back for the Heroism epics, or DPSing in tank pieces. Due to its unified and really striking look, Might was the set that told other players what a warrior was and did in raids.
To choose between clown and bug
Onyxia's Lair and Blackwing Lair, as well as Ragnaros, helped give us the Battlegear of Wrath. Also a dedicated tanking set, Wrath was the set that proved that there's nothing warriors like in a set of armor quite like ridiculously elaborate shoulders and helmets with huge, bear-trap-like maws on them. These are trends that reoccurred again and again. Also known as the Axe-Shoulders set and the Shark-Fin for the crest on the helmet (also somewhat axe-like), Wrath was the first set I completed as a tank and is still one of my absolute favorite sets.
BWL was also the raid where DPS warriors finally started completing their gear, even if it was mostly all older models reused again. The Helm of Endless Rage replaced many warrior's Crowns of Destruction, the Chromatic Boots replaced blue Strat or Scholo boots, and the Drake Talon Pauldrons were the first dedicated DPS plate shoulders. Many warriors upgraded to them from Valor before Heroism was introduced.
What this all shows us is that tanking sets were where it was at in terms of a unique and unified visual set of armor for a warrior. If you wanted to look like you did at level 40 but in all the colors of a crayon box, you could easily do so in DPS gear. Zul'Gurub didn't really improve this much, giving us plate gear in a red and blue color scheme that reminded one of Spider-Man. As we'll see when we discuss AQ's Conqueror's Battlegear, the Vindicator set was neither a tanking nor a DPS set, but a mish-mash with pieces slanted toward different uses.
The release of Ahn'Qiraj shook things up slightly. For one thing, with the exception of C'thun and Ouro, all the other gear from AQ was a sidegrade to BWL gear. For the first time, a new raid didn't provide much in the way of a power boost for raiders; it mostly filled itemization holes and gave you a chance to get gear of equivalent power if you just weren't getting lucky in BWL.Secondly, AQ's aesthetic was entirely new, and the means to gain the gear sets came in the form of WoW's first token system. Anne Stickney already covered this in exhaustive detail in this week's World of Wardrobe, so I'll just say that for DPS warriors, the Day-Glo motif was now accentuated with the chance to look like a gigantic insect. A Day-Glo insect.
I've set an image of my warrior from the AQ days into this post so you can really experience exactly what it was like to be a warrior in those dark times. You can see that I'm actually using the Might legs to DPS in, because better simply had not dropped (indeed, did not actually exist outside of the Conqueror's set; most DPS warriors used the Scaled Sand Reaver Leggings if they could get them). You can also see that I'm using the shoulders from the Conqueror's Battlegear, a set with tanking and DPS itemization that tried to serve two masters and failed both. It looked distinctive, however -- there's no denying that.
All of the experimentation in the raids, building from the solid but unremarkable foundation of the level 57 dungeon blues (which themselves were an improvement on leveling gear like the Imperial Plate set), led to Naxxramas. Naxxramas continued the trend of itemizing the warrior class set as a pure tank set, as Might and Wrath had, and was even more distinctive and unified visually than either of those sets. The Dreadnaught's Battlegear was absolutely perfect, visually, for the instance it was found in. (Dreadnaught was actually more complicated to collect than any previous tier, requiring a variety of items including boss token drops and raw materials that could be quite expensive to create.)
All of Naxxramas' gear had a unifiying visual so distinctive and compelling that much of it was reused in the later Naxxramas-10's loot table, and the Dreadnaught set was retooled for tier 7. The visual set for warriors grew in complexity every raid tier from the MC era to Naxxramas, and it was the Naxxramas look that influenced what would come next in The Burning Crusade.
Next week, protection as a PVP spec. When we return to discussing unified warrior visuals, we'll cover how DPS went from the "I am wearing a neon bug" look to sharting tier gear with tanks, how item models and recolors proliferated, and how trends in set design shifted between tiers.
Filed under: Warrior, Analysis / Opinion, (Warrior) The Care and Feeding of Warriors






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
Wilk Sep 10th 2011 2:15PM
Hm, last paragraph: "...to sharting tier gear with tanks..."
I think you meant sharing.
Phaed Sep 10th 2011 3:26PM
Hell, every time that I need tier gear sharted by some boss, I do it with tanks.
Sleutel Sep 10th 2011 6:51PM
I just want to hug anyone whose spellcheck includes the word "sharting."
velutina Sep 10th 2011 2:34PM
What I want for my warrior is recolored Valor/Heroism set. I want Jet (i.e., glossy) black with (bright) silver trim. Seems like all my sets since then are various shades of rusty. I want shiny armor -- spit and polish, not dirty.
Grokmar Sep 10th 2011 2:36PM
Drake Talon Pauldrons links to Chromatic Boots.
Sleutel Sep 10th 2011 2:46PM
Thank god, ANOTHER giant underbite. JUST WHAT I'D ALWAYS WANTED.
Still glad I stepped away from raiding.
Wiedmaier Sep 10th 2011 3:19PM
Even in a superficial gear style column, you deliver insight and depth Mr. Rossi. I am constantly amazed by your analysis and quality of your articles.
rkaliski Sep 10th 2011 3:53PM
The tanking helm from ZA during the Burning Crusade had to be the second ugliest Warrior helm in the game. Walking around with a dead parrot on my noggin was downright embarrasing.
I want to know what in the hell was going through the mind of the guy who designed the tier 1 helm. Hummm...you left the most important area of my body the brain open to attack. Good one. It ranks right up there with safety glasses with no lenses.
One final thought. OH GHOSTCRAWLER, when are we finally going to get that broken horn fixed on our Wraith set? It looked just plain stupid. It was like I was using tanking gear I bought second hand from Goodwill.
ugoticedbro Sep 10th 2011 4:53PM
Roll a tauren. Your horns override the horns of the helm and makes it look better. Tauren always look better.
rkaliski Sep 10th 2011 5:45PM
Tauren Warriors in Tier two looked more dangerious than raid bosses. Tauren Druids looked like a christmas tree with a cow stuck in it.
Ianmis Sep 10th 2011 4:08PM
I was hoping someone could link me to a site or maybe an article of this column that would tell me how to build my fury warrior dps stats, rotation and spec. I tried looking for it here but either completely missed it or just couldn't find it. Surprisingly, EJ has no articles with just the necessary info for Fury or Arms like they do for Prot. Just discussions from various people telling how great their dps is on target dummies. And while I'm sure the info I want is in there somewhere, I really have no desire to piece it together from 32 pages of discussion when other specs and classes are put together so well on the first page. Thank you for the help. :D
Also, I realize the new t13 set look is a big deal but I was really looking forward to tips for prot pvp. Hope to see it soon. ;)
Sleutel Sep 10th 2011 6:46PM
Apparently you missed the giant, glaringly obvious EJ thread, which has the basic details for Prot AND Fury AND Arms:
http://elitistjerks.com/f81/t110350-cataclysm_warrior_faq_4_2_read_while_patching_before_posting/
Ianmis Sep 11th 2011 4:15AM
Yes, yes I did. ty.
michlin Sep 10th 2011 4:26PM
i dont get how blizz have been giving us hunters the heads of bosses themed helms then now they give warriors the freaking head of deathwing!!!! wtf, u watch us get a shitty helm of a whelpling or something =p
Fletcher Sep 10th 2011 8:03PM
If hunters don't get a spiritual successor to Tier Two - dragon heads on the shoulders and hat - Blizzard is Doin It Rong.
But then they missed a golden opportunity to make a core hound themed set for hunters in T12, so who knows.
Anything's better than Gronnstalker, right?
robitrock Sep 11th 2011 7:34AM
lol *Rong*
themightysven Sep 10th 2011 4:24PM
If you're right, Ysera will proly go to druids, and we'll only see it on female tauren restos (oh yeah) and Alex could either go to mages or priests, who would proly just be excited to know that they still do, in fact, have legs.
Ianmis Sep 10th 2011 5:05PM
With the recent change to threat, is Vigilance worth picking up anymore? I've been leveling a Prot Warrior recently and just hit 80 yesterday. I haven't bothered to pick up the talent yet and it doesn't seem to really be an issue despite dps seeming to inflate faster than tank (seriously, lvl 77 arcane Mage doing over 8k single target with just heirloom gear), even when foolish dps make the pull or attack the one mob I haven't reigned in yet. I just charge the wayward mob and shield slam/rend/Devastate, maybe a Thunderclap for good measure and then go back to my other mobs and things seem fine.
So, do you think we can expect Vigilance to be redesigned, replaced or maybe just removed altogether? Or does it still have a valuable place in the Prot arsenal? If it is redesigned or replaced, what do you think it will be or what would you like to see?
Swarschild Sep 10th 2011 6:33PM
I'd say it doesn't really have much use in 5-mans, but in raids it's great. I can keep Vengeance from falling off completely when I'm not being hit and the other tank is, and that Taunt reset is awesome (though I'm biased about that because I use it to knock down Spinners on Beth).
Sleutel Sep 10th 2011 6:48PM
Ever since it stopped transferring threat, Vengeance has had approximately zero utility outside of multi-tank fights. You should be using it in the same way that you have been since that change. In a raid, it should go on a fellow tank, to help build your Vengeance stacks and proc your Taunt; in a five-man, it should go on anyone who has a habit of picking up mobs before you can hit them. If you're not raiding, you can probably safely ditch it completely.