Skip to Content
9-13-2011 @ 10:10PM
Honestly, I'm really annoyed about this. I'm usually on Blizzard's side and can generally see where they're going with things, but let's think about this.A) It's a dagger . . . One of the coolest aspects of Legendaries is their impressive asthetic. Warglaives look all kinds of awesome, Sulfuras and Shadowmourne glow like candles in a dark room, Thunderfury is -STILL- one of the largest weapon models in the game, Val'anyr has an awesome animation . . . what exactly are you suppsed to do with a dagger?B) Rogues again? Really? Thunderfury is generally held as a tank weapon, but it was an option for Rogues, too (Fast 1H sword with agility and a damage proc). The problem is that it had way too much threat gen for most tanks to hold off, so any rogue using it could expect to go splat pretty often. Warglaives are restricted to Warrior's, Rogue's and DK's, and raiding Rogues wanted Thor'idal as much as any Hunter during BC. We haven't seen a tanking Legendary since Classic and Rogue's are about to get their fourth?
First time? A confirmation email will be sent to you after submitting.
Members enter your username and password.
Enter your AOL or AIM screenname and password.
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.