Featured stories Feed
- Know Your Lore: Gul'dan, Doomhammer, and the nature of the Horde
- Totem Talk: Restoration and the Throne of Thunder, Part 4
- The Queue: No sleep till Orgrimmar
- Around Azeroth: Close encounters of the blurry kind
- Breakfast Topic: Should Blizzard brake base XP while preserving boosts for experienced players?
Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-16-2011 @ 5:41PM
incoming00 said...
why dont they opt for a digital magazine? since the WoW magazine is the official WoW magazine and possibly backed by Blizzard, they could just have first dibs on news stories, tiers, and such. not everyone that plays WoW also digs for the latest news, and not everyone visits the battle.net WoW page or is a fan on facebook...
Reply
9-16-2011 @ 5:57PM
Kakume said...
Whatever about a physical magazine you can get delivered, I doubt the business model exists for a paid subscription website that covers material much of which would eventually get coverage on other sites.
9-16-2011 @ 5:59PM
Kakume said...
That said... I'd have been all over an iPad version.
9-16-2011 @ 6:05PM
incoming00 said...
Gamepro Magazine and GameInformer are two magazines that i am aware of that offer both digitial and physcial magazines. it is possible for WoW to continue as digital, but i highly doubt at its current subscription price.
9-16-2011 @ 7:56PM
llcjay2003 said...
Except Gamepro just went quarterly, news stand only.