15 Minutes of Fame: Progressive guild thrives under uncommon leadership team

There's plenty about Wreck List of Garrosh (US-H) that's a little different from your run-of-the-mill World of Warcraft guild. The sprawling social guild doused Ragnaros just days ago with a team of core raiders rooted by several members in their 50s and 60s. In fact, the guild is run primarily by women over the age of 50 -- "at age 51, I'm the baby of the group," admits guild leader Dkosmama. With a median member age of about 40, Wreck List boasts well over 200 members, half of them women.
Even more remarkable than its unusual gender and age mix, though, are the guild's roots -- Wreck List is the unofficial guild of the popular progressive political blog Daily Kos. Not limited to members from the Daily Kos community, Wreck List is open to any player looking for a sanctuary from trade chat madness, away from "threatening racist, homophobic, and misogynist language and ideas." The group's official Declaration of Purpose clearly states that "while guild chat is mostly non-political, it is also where we express our leftist political views, which sometimes may include a sharp word or two about Republicans. Because many guild members did not come to the Wreck List through political blogs, we do not expect everyone to hold progressive views on all issues; however, we do expect that all members respect the liberal foundation of the guild."
An unusual balance for an entire guild? We thought so, too, and sat down to visit with Dkosmama about the balance of ideas and free expression that makes this whole group hang together.
Editor's note: This article focuses on this group's integration with the World of Warcraft and is not an endorsement or promotion of any particular political ideology or agenda. Please keep comments focused on the guild and its activities, rather than political ideologies.
Main character DkosmamaGuild Wreck List
Realm Garrosh (US-H)
15 Minutes of Fame: Take us on this journey, Dkosmama -- how do we get from a well-known political blog to a World of Warcraft guild? What kicked off this idea, and who stepped up to make it happen?
Dkosmama: In late March of 2009, Moodyloner posted a comment in a community diary on Daily Kos about World of Warcraft. Other players joined in, and within a day or so, they had decided to roll Horde on Garrosh and start a Daily Kos guild called Wreck List.
Moody, a fan of nontraditional online organizing, explains: "I've been in other guilds before. Good guilds. Solid raiders. Nice people. But, and this is a big but, I'd find myself watching what I talked about in guild chat. I'd soon learn that there were subjects that I could not talk about -- politics, rights, equality, feminism. Soloing was worse -- general and trade chats were infamous, and still are, for the hostility. ... And I was trying to level, and I couldn't talk to my guildies, and I couldn't talk to anyone else.
"I thought it would be something, not to have a raiding guild or a PvP guild or a leveling guild, but to have a liberal guild," [Moody continued]. "A guild united not by what people did in game, but what people were like out of it."
By all accounts, it sounds as if it's grown to become a pretty large group.
Currently we have about 825 members representing about 270 accounts. Roughly two-thirds of our members are from Daily Kos or other liberal blogs, notably Balloon Juice. The other third have come to us from the server or are people who searched for a "liberal guild," found us, read our guild's Declaration of Purpose and Principles, applied online and then switched servers to be with us.
What proportion of the players refer themselves over from the Daily Kos?
Of our Daily Kos members, some are just readers, and some are very involved with the site. Every summer, our raiding takes a bit of a hiatus as a bunch of members attend the annual Netroots Nation conference. One of our members, Suluca, is a staff writer for the front page of Daily Kos as well as a moderator for the Black Kos community.
Every Thursday, Moody posts a diary to Daily Kos about what's going in with the guild -- and every week, like clockwork, we have at least one or two new members join us from there.

Actually, we've have had some issues in the past. Because of these issues, last year I asked a group of senior members to draft a Declaration of Purpose and Principles for the guild, to be like our constitution. The committee included two lawyers, an anthropologist, and three of the founding members of guild, one of whom was an experienced raider and another who never raids, plus Moodyloner.
As they worked on the initial draft, I asked other senior guild members to be quest givers for a series of quests that would introduce the newer members to our history and guiding principles. By doing the quests, members would unlock a forum on our guild website where they could read and help edit the draft declaration. The whole process took about three weeks, and most people had a blast!
Today, we require anyone who wishes to join the guild to read the Guild Declaration first and then fill out an application.
For the majority of people who join, being a member of the Wreck List is a dream come true -- a dream of civility, cooperation and compassion -- but we aren't for everyone. We expect all members to respect the political foundations of the guild. Additionally, we also are not a hardcore raiding guild, although we do have two excellent raiding teams. So we've had a few Daily Kos people join who were looking for the discipline and competitiveness of a high-end raiding guild and decided that we weren't the right guild for them, either.
So your guild culture is appreciably different, then, than that of most other guilds?
I think we are very different. For example, I read about issues of fighting in raids, loot ninjas, factions, and general guild drama. We don't have any of that. The one issue that does come up occasionally [is when] a conservative or hardcore raider joins the guild because of a friend or family member and then realizes that he or she is in the wrong place.
Other differences include that the guild pays for every member's repairs, whether for raiding or just leveling. We work hard to make sure that we can help new members get equipped, and if someone needs a stack of gems to level JC or an epic crafted piece, members help with that, too.
But I think the main thing that sets our guild apart is our demographics. We have members from elementary school up to retirement age, with a median age of about 40. We have a number of university professors, as well as attorneys, political activists, military personnel, scientists, teachers, writers, and students, which means that the topics that come up in guild chat are fairly diverse.
And for anyone who thinks that raiding is something that only young people can do well, I'd like to introduce them to a few of college professors I know.

Right now on our forums, there is a thread discussing capital punishment and Troy Davis, another debunking the recent GOP attacks on Social Security, and third on racism in the trade channel and how to get Blizzard to address it. If you're in the game and there is important breaking news, someone will always let the guild know.
There are discussions all the time about politics and current events, but also about history, science, and literature. And we even talk about the game, too. What we aren't doing is arguing about politics, so much as sharing various progressive takes on issues of the day.
Do you have any rules of engagement as far as political debate goes?
In general, all guild chat is rated PG, and personal attacks or statements that are meant to cause offense or drama are not permitted. In the opening of our Guild Declaration, it is quite clear that we are not a debating society. Because we share similar values, we can have spirited discussions about policy specifics while all agreeing on the core issues. While some members may disagree with President Obama's handling of certain things, no one in the guild doubts the fact that he was born in America.
In the past, some conservatives who were in the guild because of friends challenged us, saying while we claim to be tolerant toward diversity, we weren't tolerant of different political views - just like GOP members of Congress today demand that the Democrats be bipartisan while refusing to compromise on anything.
It's not about tolerance. We absolutely do not allow any comments in guild chat or Vent that are racist, sexist, or homophobic. And we also do not allow right-wing talking points. In other words, having women, gays, members of ethnic/racial minorities, or senior citizens in the guild is not a sign of "tolerance" -- it's who we are!
You certainly do have a demographic that's definitely different from the norm.
About half the guild is women, including officers. There are a lot of families that play together here, too - spouses, parents and their kids, and so on. We work hard to keep this a safe, comfortable and family friendly place to play.

We try to do it all, except for serious roleplaying. We have two progression raid teams, some very dedicated PVPers, and lots of leveling, as well as the occasional special guild event, heritage raids, guild achievement chasing, and so on.
Actually, during our guild quest event last year, many people really got into roleplaying, too. There's a funny story about that. One guy had joined as a friend of a friend just before the event started. Everyone was sent off to find the first quest giver. The first quest involved collecting 10 Small Barnacled Clams and turning them in order to get the next quest. Pretty easy standard WoW quest, right? We've all done hundreds of these. Well this guy went off the deep end: "You want me to collect clams and then turn them in just so I can get another quest? You people are crazy!" And then he rage-quit -- or as we like to call it, clam-quit.
Tell us about your own involvement at the Daily Kos, Dkosmama.
I started posting at Daily Kos back in early 2003. That was in the early days of political blogs. I found the site through my online involvement with the Howard Dean campaign and became a regular reader and sometime contributor.
Daily Kos has evolved from a simple political blog to a massive online community where anyone who joins can post a diary or blog as well as join in discussions by posting comments. I post there a couple times a year, although I comment regularly and read it almost daily.
And how did you become guild mama of the WoW guild?I became guild leader sort of by accident, but after two years, it seems people like the way I do things. Early on, we had several of members who had their accounts hacked. At the time, I was the only one with an authenticator, so the then-guild-leader put me in charge. We had some rocky times with drama and personality conflicts -- basically, growing pains. And there were times when my husband questioned the amount of time and emotional energy the guild required. That was my prime motivation for creating our guild Declaration of Purpose and Principle.
Since then, so many members have offered to take on various aspect of guild management -- everything from keeping the guild vault organized, to moderating our guild forums, to running our Facebook page, to coordinating raids -- that there's not a whole lot for me to do these days. I only step in when there is an issue that requires the guild leader to take action. For major decisions, I always talk to the senior guild members, the Guild Elders, and we work together to arrive at a consensus.
I've never felt that this was "my guild." Rather, is it an organization I am honored to be part of and especially honored to lead. This guild is a fabulous and supportive place to hang out with people who share similar values and really care about each other and the rest of the world.
Editor's note: This article focuses on this group's integration with the World of Warcraft and is not an endorsement or promotion of any particular political ideology or agenda. Please keep comments focused on the guild and its activities, rather than political ideologies.
Learn more about the guild at the Wreck List website or read more about the group's World of Warcraft involvement at the Daily Kos.
Filed under: Guilds, Interviews, 15 Minutes of Fame
Patch 5.3 interview with Ghostcrawler
Mystery of the Unborn Val'kyr
The latest patch 5.3 news
All of the latest Mists of Pandaria news





Reader Comments (Page 2 of 7)
Ruth Sep 30th 2011 9:11AM
@spamfest: If you really want to get into that argument, and I don't believe anyone does, there are studies that have shown that a person's beliefs and prejudices are also genetically influenced.
So maybe the 'Republican' didn't choose to think that way, just like the homosexual didn't choose to feel that way and the african didn't choose to look that way.
Bill's comments have their merit though. Some of the talk was contradictory - this happens when people talk about not talking about politics. But that doesn't make it okay.
Dkosmama Sep 30th 2011 11:29AM
At one time we had a fair number of more conservative members. And most of them were pretty quiet about politics. But in the end virtually all of them chose to leave and form (or reform) other guilds which had very similar standards to ours, but were entirely apolitical. We still have very friendly relationships with these other guilds and there are quite a few people who have toons in both guilds. The only time I have ever kicked someone from the guild was for using explicitly racially or sexually offensive epithets or for causing undo drama. As an example, frequently in game and in real life, we hear people say, "That's so gay," as a put down. Another common ingame remark might refer to "raping" the opposing faction in a BG. While neither of these is a kickable first offense, the individual responsible should expect to have a long conversation with an officer about why such language usage is offensive to many members of the guild. For the record, I have never had to explain to a fellow progressive why the phrase, "That's so gay" is offensive. Does this mean that we we believe that all those to the right of us politically use this phrase as an insult? Absolutely not! Anyone who asserts otherwise is manufacturing drama here. However, in our collective experience, those that do so have always from the right side of the political spectrum.
The website Daily Kos is explicitly for partisan Democrats, and that's where many of us come from. The game is where we relax and play. We like playing Wow, and we like talking about current events from a liberal or progressive or Democratic Party perspective. When we are relaxing, we have no interest in debating the latest from Fox News. We're not a debating society. We're a bunch of Democratic and progressive activists who also play WoW. We are not denying anyone the ability to endorse any candidate or idea. However, if we wanted to play with people who do so, there are thousands of other guilds we could join. We want to talk the nuts and bolts of liberal politics while we play. If that's not your cup of tea, that's fine. Just don't take the fact that we exist as an attack on you personally.
So why do we "discriminate" against those on the right? We don't but just as in a guild for vegans or for cat lovers or for Christians, someone who wanted to talk about health benefits of eating meat or the superiority of dogs to cats or why atheism rocks, would end up causing drama, someone who wants to talk about how awesome Rick Perry is or how social security is a ponzi scheme would also end up causing drama. The main issue for us is one that will probably surprise many here. We find that when we know someone in the guild holds such views, we tend to censor ourselves so as not to offend said individual. But this is at cross purposes for the reason for our guild — to be able to comfortably talk about something that we believe in while playing a game we like. This is not to say that a person who doesn't agree with us politically is a bad person, but only that they would do better in a guild of foodies or animal lovers or a guild with no religious foundations. For this reason we are selective about who we admit.
Why is this such a hard concept to grasp?
dgillandersjr Sep 29th 2011 7:40PM
App sent. Will hopefully be approved and allowed to flip my hunter over there ASAP!
Jyotai Sep 29th 2011 7:46PM
OMG. The things going to fill up before I can get there...
Hold the door open folks. :)
Won't get home until about 11pm PST today... (that's the dead of night for those east coasters on Garrosh I guess). But even if I come with a level 1 alt I'm going to be applying to this place.
And since it is on an east coast server, are things 'dead' by the time those of us on the west coast get online?
I'm not around most nights until 6pm California time, 9pm New York...
dgillandersjr Sep 29th 2011 7:49PM
@ joy, Im in the same boat. I live about 10 minutes from Blizzard actually out here in CA. No biggie, this wouldnt be my main and is just someone I want to kill some stuff with and have a good political discourse with like-minded folks.
frank.fujita Sep 29th 2011 8:22PM
We have many players from each of the four continental US time zones, and I don't expect us to start turning good people away because we're full any time soon.
Aeren Sep 29th 2011 8:06PM
*Comes out of lurking.*
I can tell you right away that a guild like this would not be for me. I'm sure they're all very nice people, but this interview has given me a not so good impression of the guild as a whole. It just seems to me that this is a group of people that really prefers to just surround themselves with yes-men and others that won't pose any serious challenge to their opinions and beliefs. And having been in large guilds before, I severely doubt that they're drama free. They may put a damper on drama over politics, but I'm sure it crops up elsewhere.
While I respect the fact that they go out of their way to try and create and maintain a family friendly environment, I don't agree with the limitations they have placed upon what views and opinions can be expressed and discussed.
Otherwise, I'm glad to see such a large guild take an active role to create a community that's safe and fun for everyone involved.
Killik Sep 30th 2011 5:26AM
To be fair, the majority of the guild holds such strong liberal views that they'd be asking for trouble if they *didn't* put a damper on right-wing talking points. Can you imagine the mayhem in guildchat? How easy it would be for a troll to derail *all* guild activity, including ongoing raids?
Yukitaro Sep 29th 2011 8:18PM
I joined because of a Drama Mamas comment that linked the guild's Declaration of Principles. At first I was in love with the guild -- nobody could ever do anything wrong. Since then, I've become more realistic. But this is a wonderful group of people to play with. My brother is not at all liberal, and he has to bite his tongue on occasion, but he knows that while we don't agree with his politics, we have his back and he is welcome to stay with us as long as he abides by the Principles. I've only been with the guild for 10 months, but in that time I've not seen anyone /gkicked. About once every other month, someone will start behaving badly, and an officer will quote some part of the Principles, and sometimes the person decides to leave and other times decides to act according to the Principles.
In our raiding group, it's a common event to have someone win the roll for a piece of loot, and then a couple of seconds later say, "Oh, you should have this, it's a much bigger upgrade for you than it is for me." And we do care about loot.
Because we pay for repairs for all toons in the guild, sometimes the gbank gets a bit low. And the Guild Message of the Day let's us know, but usually by the time I log on, the balance is +20k of what it was when the GMotD was changed.
I can imagine that I might stop playing WoW, but I can't imagine leaving the guild. Others have deployed overseas, or taken a semester off of WoW, but they keep in touch, and we welcome them back when they return.
Finnioch Sep 29th 2011 8:24PM
I'm sorry, but I must protest.
You have a disclaimer asking that commenters refrain from political discussion, yet a large chunk of this article is talking about the Daily Kos and involves a guild leader taking cheap swipes at people with whom she disagrees with politically.
I found this particularly galling...
"...some conservatives who were in the guild because of friends challenged us, saying while we claim to be tolerant toward diversity, we weren't tolerant of different political views....
It's not about tolerance. We absolutely do not allow any comments in guild chat or Vent that are racist, sexist, or homophobic..."
The GM makes a blanket generalization that anyone to the right of her politically is automatically racist, sexist, or a homophobe, and you don't say a thing about it. How you thought that no one would be insulted by this article is beyond me. Granted, I'm not expecting hard hitting journalism here, but I am beyond disappointed.
Alas, I seem to be swimming against the current as far as the comments go, so now that I've said my piece I'll end it here and await the trolling.
Afterall, it is the internet.
Oteo Sep 29th 2011 10:29PM
Well, what if all of the conservatives who were kicked were kicked because they broke that rule? I have *never* seen a purported liberal use the "You say you're tolerant, but you're not tolerant of my views!" accusation. I only ever see that used when a purported conservative is being criticized for expressing racist, homophobic, or sexist view.
She's not necessarily painting ALL conservatives as racist/sexist/homophobic, but painting only those who were kicked from the guild for those types of comments in guild chat.
Jim Griffin Sep 29th 2011 10:58PM
I see what you did there...
First, preemptively labeling any disagreement with your comment as "trolling" is in the same class of behavior that you are decrying here.
Second, nice selective editing of the quote to make it sound like exactly what you want it to sound like rather than what it actually said. Let's look at the full two paragraphs, shall we:
In the past, some conservatives who were in the guild because of friends challenged us, saying while we claim to be tolerant toward diversity, we weren't tolerant of different political views - just like GOP members of Congress today demand that the Democrats be bipartisan while refusing to compromise on anything.
It's not about tolerance. We absolutely do not allow any comments in guild chat or Vent that are racist, sexist, or homophobic. And we also do not allow right-wing talking points. In other words, having women, gays, members of ethnic/racial minorities, or senior citizens in the guild is not a sign of "tolerance" -- it's who we are!
What I say here also applies to mamasama's comment below. Nowhere is there a "blanket generalization" equating the right to racism or homophobia. (Project much?) Rather, it is an enumeration of things not allowed in guild chat or Vent. We do not allow racism. We do not allow sexism. We do not allow homophobia. And we do not right wing talking points. Not We don't allow right wing talking points because all that they are racist, sexist or homophobic slurs. Next time, just tamp down your eternal indignation for a few seconds so that you can comprehend what was said before commenting.
The reason why folks in Wreck List want a guild chat free of right wing talking points is that we are bombarded by them every single day. Many of us are engaged in careers where we are debating such views eight to twelve hours a day in order to make a better world (campaign hacks, public servants, activists). We don't fear such a conversation or the people on the other side parroting the right wing talking points. But WoW is a game. It is way we relax at the end of the day and escape the bitterness of the real world. We don't want to have our life's work attacked while we are trying to kill Shannox and don't want to be constantly on guard against the griefing of a conservative.
And in all honesty, political talk takes up maybe 5% of guild chat - generally more during a televised debate or big speech. Most of the rest of the time we talk about how Taymatt screwed up a raid.
Amaxe Sep 29th 2011 8:27PM
Hmm, another month comes to a close and another controversial topic shows up.
For all the emphasis on the claim that this is "not an endorsement or promotion of any particular political ideology or agenda," it sure gave them a forum to do exactly that.
If I may make a suggestion, please consider not featuring groups which can be deemed partisan in nature, whether liberal or conservative.
Invierna Sep 29th 2011 9:10PM
Really, they're the biggest guild on their server and they've been around for years. They're a niche guild, at that. I think they deserve the post.
Find a Republican guild as big, eh? I bet you won't. Community ain't their style. Blizzard would have to bail out their guild bank...
MusedMoose Sep 29th 2011 9:15PM
"If I may make a suggestion, please consider not featuring groups which can be deemed partisan in nature, whether liberal or conservative."
*raises hand* Seconded. There's enough political (expletive deleted) everywhere without it showing up in WoW too, and for we in the USA, it's only going to get worse over the next year. I would really like to have it be absent from this site. Thank you.
Tom Sep 29th 2011 11:07PM
Mixing politics and WoW is usually unpleasant, but WoW and politics aren't being mixed in this article. This is simply a profile of an unusual guild, and an interesting profile at that.
There's no proselytizing going on here, just a column covering what the column covers.
Amaxe Sep 29th 2011 11:56PM
@Tom.
There may be no proselytizing on the part of WoW Insider (though i am dubious). I don't think you can honestly say that about the Daily Kos and their guild.
@Invierna
Excuse me, but you seem to utterly have failed to grasp the point. It is not whether or not WoW Insider chose a Liberal guild or a Conservative guild. It's the fact that they chose a guild which is based on a political view in real life, and that view is going to be controversial to a portion of the readers.
Invierna Sep 30th 2011 12:06AM
And heaven forbid we discuss anything controversial. They should probably have never posted a comment by Ghostcrawler in this history of this site, if we were that concerned about controversy.
Tom Sep 30th 2011 12:18AM
That may be the case at the website and in the guild, but there's no legitimate basis for opinions regarding the politics of WoW Insider. That the column covered something you'd rather not see covered doesn't mean that the article is a poor one.
As I said in a reply elsewhere:
"Instead, the columnist sits on the sidelines and acts as a stenographer."
... which is precisely what she should be doing.
If someone wants to see a conservative counterpart profiled, then it's up to them to suggest it to Lisa.
Amaxe Sep 30th 2011 12:27AM
@Invierna
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/straw-man.html
OK, that's simply a dishonest twisting of my words.
1) Ghostcrawler is directly relevant to the game. Some of us might like his decrees. Others might hate them. But they are relevant to the game. Any arguments we have in WoW Insider are directly relevant to the game.
2) IRL political views are not relevant to the game. They stir up arguments having nothing to do with the game.
The two are not the same.
As I said elsewhere, I don't give a damn if Lisa covered the Daily Kos or the Tea Party... it would have been inappropriate either way.
@Tom
Then we disagree. It is not the part of Lisa to merely be a stenographer when the interviewee goes off topic and begins pushing views outside of the game. That's where the good interviewer says, "this is off topic. Can we get back to what the guild does in game?"
Also, you presume too much. I don't believe I've said anything which indicates my political views. I've merely said political views do not belong in WoW Insider.