15 Minutes of Fame: Progressive guild thrives under uncommon leadership team

There's plenty about Wreck List of Garrosh (US-H) that's a little different from your run-of-the-mill World of Warcraft guild. The sprawling social guild doused Ragnaros just days ago with a team of core raiders rooted by several members in their 50s and 60s. In fact, the guild is run primarily by women over the age of 50 -- "at age 51, I'm the baby of the group," admits guild leader Dkosmama. With a median member age of about 40, Wreck List boasts well over 200 members, half of them women.
Even more remarkable than its unusual gender and age mix, though, are the guild's roots -- Wreck List is the unofficial guild of the popular progressive political blog Daily Kos. Not limited to members from the Daily Kos community, Wreck List is open to any player looking for a sanctuary from trade chat madness, away from "threatening racist, homophobic, and misogynist language and ideas." The group's official Declaration of Purpose clearly states that "while guild chat is mostly non-political, it is also where we express our leftist political views, which sometimes may include a sharp word or two about Republicans. Because many guild members did not come to the Wreck List through political blogs, we do not expect everyone to hold progressive views on all issues; however, we do expect that all members respect the liberal foundation of the guild."
An unusual balance for an entire guild? We thought so, too, and sat down to visit with Dkosmama about the balance of ideas and free expression that makes this whole group hang together.
Editor's note: This article focuses on this group's integration with the World of Warcraft and is not an endorsement or promotion of any particular political ideology or agenda. Please keep comments focused on the guild and its activities, rather than political ideologies.
Main character DkosmamaGuild Wreck List
Realm Garrosh (US-H)
15 Minutes of Fame: Take us on this journey, Dkosmama -- how do we get from a well-known political blog to a World of Warcraft guild? What kicked off this idea, and who stepped up to make it happen?
Dkosmama: In late March of 2009, Moodyloner posted a comment in a community diary on Daily Kos about World of Warcraft. Other players joined in, and within a day or so, they had decided to roll Horde on Garrosh and start a Daily Kos guild called Wreck List.
Moody, a fan of nontraditional online organizing, explains: "I've been in other guilds before. Good guilds. Solid raiders. Nice people. But, and this is a big but, I'd find myself watching what I talked about in guild chat. I'd soon learn that there were subjects that I could not talk about -- politics, rights, equality, feminism. Soloing was worse -- general and trade chats were infamous, and still are, for the hostility. ... And I was trying to level, and I couldn't talk to my guildies, and I couldn't talk to anyone else.
"I thought it would be something, not to have a raiding guild or a PvP guild or a leveling guild, but to have a liberal guild," [Moody continued]. "A guild united not by what people did in game, but what people were like out of it."
By all accounts, it sounds as if it's grown to become a pretty large group.
Currently we have about 825 members representing about 270 accounts. Roughly two-thirds of our members are from Daily Kos or other liberal blogs, notably Balloon Juice. The other third have come to us from the server or are people who searched for a "liberal guild," found us, read our guild's Declaration of Purpose and Principles, applied online and then switched servers to be with us.
What proportion of the players refer themselves over from the Daily Kos?
Of our Daily Kos members, some are just readers, and some are very involved with the site. Every summer, our raiding takes a bit of a hiatus as a bunch of members attend the annual Netroots Nation conference. One of our members, Suluca, is a staff writer for the front page of Daily Kos as well as a moderator for the Black Kos community.
Every Thursday, Moody posts a diary to Daily Kos about what's going in with the guild -- and every week, like clockwork, we have at least one or two new members join us from there.

Actually, we've have had some issues in the past. Because of these issues, last year I asked a group of senior members to draft a Declaration of Purpose and Principles for the guild, to be like our constitution. The committee included two lawyers, an anthropologist, and three of the founding members of guild, one of whom was an experienced raider and another who never raids, plus Moodyloner.
As they worked on the initial draft, I asked other senior guild members to be quest givers for a series of quests that would introduce the newer members to our history and guiding principles. By doing the quests, members would unlock a forum on our guild website where they could read and help edit the draft declaration. The whole process took about three weeks, and most people had a blast!
Today, we require anyone who wishes to join the guild to read the Guild Declaration first and then fill out an application.
For the majority of people who join, being a member of the Wreck List is a dream come true -- a dream of civility, cooperation and compassion -- but we aren't for everyone. We expect all members to respect the political foundations of the guild. Additionally, we also are not a hardcore raiding guild, although we do have two excellent raiding teams. So we've had a few Daily Kos people join who were looking for the discipline and competitiveness of a high-end raiding guild and decided that we weren't the right guild for them, either.
So your guild culture is appreciably different, then, than that of most other guilds?
I think we are very different. For example, I read about issues of fighting in raids, loot ninjas, factions, and general guild drama. We don't have any of that. The one issue that does come up occasionally [is when] a conservative or hardcore raider joins the guild because of a friend or family member and then realizes that he or she is in the wrong place.
Other differences include that the guild pays for every member's repairs, whether for raiding or just leveling. We work hard to make sure that we can help new members get equipped, and if someone needs a stack of gems to level JC or an epic crafted piece, members help with that, too.
But I think the main thing that sets our guild apart is our demographics. We have members from elementary school up to retirement age, with a median age of about 40. We have a number of university professors, as well as attorneys, political activists, military personnel, scientists, teachers, writers, and students, which means that the topics that come up in guild chat are fairly diverse.
And for anyone who thinks that raiding is something that only young people can do well, I'd like to introduce them to a few of college professors I know.

Right now on our forums, there is a thread discussing capital punishment and Troy Davis, another debunking the recent GOP attacks on Social Security, and third on racism in the trade channel and how to get Blizzard to address it. If you're in the game and there is important breaking news, someone will always let the guild know.
There are discussions all the time about politics and current events, but also about history, science, and literature. And we even talk about the game, too. What we aren't doing is arguing about politics, so much as sharing various progressive takes on issues of the day.
Do you have any rules of engagement as far as political debate goes?
In general, all guild chat is rated PG, and personal attacks or statements that are meant to cause offense or drama are not permitted. In the opening of our Guild Declaration, it is quite clear that we are not a debating society. Because we share similar values, we can have spirited discussions about policy specifics while all agreeing on the core issues. While some members may disagree with President Obama's handling of certain things, no one in the guild doubts the fact that he was born in America.
In the past, some conservatives who were in the guild because of friends challenged us, saying while we claim to be tolerant toward diversity, we weren't tolerant of different political views - just like GOP members of Congress today demand that the Democrats be bipartisan while refusing to compromise on anything.
It's not about tolerance. We absolutely do not allow any comments in guild chat or Vent that are racist, sexist, or homophobic. And we also do not allow right-wing talking points. In other words, having women, gays, members of ethnic/racial minorities, or senior citizens in the guild is not a sign of "tolerance" -- it's who we are!
You certainly do have a demographic that's definitely different from the norm.
About half the guild is women, including officers. There are a lot of families that play together here, too - spouses, parents and their kids, and so on. We work hard to keep this a safe, comfortable and family friendly place to play.

We try to do it all, except for serious roleplaying. We have two progression raid teams, some very dedicated PVPers, and lots of leveling, as well as the occasional special guild event, heritage raids, guild achievement chasing, and so on.
Actually, during our guild quest event last year, many people really got into roleplaying, too. There's a funny story about that. One guy had joined as a friend of a friend just before the event started. Everyone was sent off to find the first quest giver. The first quest involved collecting 10 Small Barnacled Clams and turning them in order to get the next quest. Pretty easy standard WoW quest, right? We've all done hundreds of these. Well this guy went off the deep end: "You want me to collect clams and then turn them in just so I can get another quest? You people are crazy!" And then he rage-quit -- or as we like to call it, clam-quit.
Tell us about your own involvement at the Daily Kos, Dkosmama.
I started posting at Daily Kos back in early 2003. That was in the early days of political blogs. I found the site through my online involvement with the Howard Dean campaign and became a regular reader and sometime contributor.
Daily Kos has evolved from a simple political blog to a massive online community where anyone who joins can post a diary or blog as well as join in discussions by posting comments. I post there a couple times a year, although I comment regularly and read it almost daily.
And how did you become guild mama of the WoW guild?I became guild leader sort of by accident, but after two years, it seems people like the way I do things. Early on, we had several of members who had their accounts hacked. At the time, I was the only one with an authenticator, so the then-guild-leader put me in charge. We had some rocky times with drama and personality conflicts -- basically, growing pains. And there were times when my husband questioned the amount of time and emotional energy the guild required. That was my prime motivation for creating our guild Declaration of Purpose and Principle.
Since then, so many members have offered to take on various aspect of guild management -- everything from keeping the guild vault organized, to moderating our guild forums, to running our Facebook page, to coordinating raids -- that there's not a whole lot for me to do these days. I only step in when there is an issue that requires the guild leader to take action. For major decisions, I always talk to the senior guild members, the Guild Elders, and we work together to arrive at a consensus.
I've never felt that this was "my guild." Rather, is it an organization I am honored to be part of and especially honored to lead. This guild is a fabulous and supportive place to hang out with people who share similar values and really care about each other and the rest of the world.
Editor's note: This article focuses on this group's integration with the World of Warcraft and is not an endorsement or promotion of any particular political ideology or agenda. Please keep comments focused on the guild and its activities, rather than political ideologies.
Learn more about the guild at the Wreck List website or read more about the group's World of Warcraft involvement at the Daily Kos.
Filed under: Guilds, Interviews, 15 Minutes of Fame
Patch 5.3 interview with Ghostcrawler
Mystery of the Unborn Val'kyr
The latest patch 5.3 news
All of the latest Mists of Pandaria news





Reader Comments (Page 5 of 7)
thawedtheorc Sep 30th 2011 4:05AM
So you guys also enjoy slamming Democrats and their ideas as well and allow people in your guild who do this anytime they like? If so, then this needs to be highlighted because I know a huge percentage of the population you are discriminating against.
pandainacan Sep 30th 2011 4:09AM
I want to state first of all that I find your attitude very poor. Instead of inviting me to come to your website and participate in your community to learn more, you reinforce this notion of rejection that I've gotten from the interview.
With that said, I find this interview terrible. As another commented stated, it sounds a lot like dkosmama has taken this opportunity to broadcast her political views instead of emphasizing the great things about the guild, the community within it, and the unique features about it. It's fine to be a liberal based guild with tons of people that have a lot in common, but when it's openly stated that certain topics, views, and opinions are basically not allowed, it really put me off.
You've basically condemned everyone that doesn't instantly like Wreck List. I wouldn't call that inclusive.
Finnioch Sep 30th 2011 6:20AM
"To those who are trashing the guild, calling us some kind of bastion of ideological intolerance, an echo chamber, and so forth, you are wrong. And not just about this particular guild, but about other things. You're wrong to judge a group you do not understand. About one you have never visited. About labels you apply without knowing what they are. You see an inclusive group as an exclusive one. You imagine yourself some kind of hero while you make common cause with monsters. And with this knowledge, I curse you: We want to be a haven for people who want to be free from daily hatred, casual prejudice, and willful ignorance. And you could not abide us."
Yep, that will convince 'em!
styopa Sep 30th 2011 9:27AM
"You're wrong to judge a group you do not understand. About one you have never visited. About labels you apply without knowing what they are. You see an inclusive group as an exclusive one. You imagine yourself some kind of hero while you make common cause with monsters. "
LOL.
So do you understand Conservatives?
Have you personally been to a Republican meeting? (Strike that, as a staunch non-religiously-motivated Republican the fervent evangelical tone of those things even make me shudder. I'll give you pass there.)
Do you even know what a Neo-Con really is?
Inclusive/exclusive: calling the color black "white" doesn't change the reality at all.
Monsters, eh? Please see the "inclusive/exclusive" discussion, above.
Ha ha ha, you win the +320% Hypocrigriff mount for that one.
thawedtheorc Sep 30th 2011 4:00AM
Not sure why we have an article about a guild with a political agenda. They call themselves progressive because they do not discriminate against sex, orientation or race.. religion.. etc. (most guilds I have been a part of have this view anyway without the term 'progressive' needed- the word is overused to express ideas that really are not all that new)
Yet they say they enjoy slamming Republicans at times.
Then WoW Insider tells us to watch the comments?
Progressive and all inclusive- sure it is great to have a guild who protects members from being attacked for the way they were born. What guild isn't?
This guild flaunts this idea as a ruse because they really just want a bunch of people with same political ideology and will not stand up for a moment for any member who thinks otherwise.
I would much rather see guilds who work to fight childhood cancer, helping single moms and actually DOING something besides grouping up and patting each other on the back for being 'the good people'.
Killik Sep 30th 2011 5:57AM
A guild that 'raided' together in the real world to raise money for charity would be a nice story.
Teleri Sep 30th 2011 6:01AM
excellent point
Invierna Sep 30th 2011 11:34PM
Now would be a good time to note that the guild members helped several of their members who lost their jobs stay in their homes, I guess. Wonder how many guilds would do that.
pandainacan Oct 1st 2011 2:11AM
@Invierna
What didn't dkosmama mention this sort of thing in the interview then? Why did she not place more emphasis on how tight and personable this guild seems to be?
This interview does not showcase a lot of good things about the guild. Really, what has been said in the interview has placed a big, ugly spotlight on the things that aren't even really all that important to the guild, from what I gather from the comments. And some of the people that I believe to be from Wreck List that commented here don't seem to be really improving my opinion of the guild. Even your comment here seems a little snarky.
It's wonderful that Wreck List has enough people that care so much about the community to help people keep their homes. But this interview has been a PR disaster in my opinion.
TheTruth1400 Sep 30th 2011 6:14AM
Well, this is the last time I visit this website. I really enjoyed coming here, but after the leftist Republican hate that this letter spews, I no longer wish to associate myself with this website.
I don't get how a wow forum could allow such onesidedness to be published on their site. I think they make it very clear in their view. That's pretty much, "Anyone is welcome, as long as you share our view." That works when you're talking game talk, but this is not WoW related at all other then the fact that they happen to play the game.
As for the editors note, seems a little like you didn't remember that it wasn't political in the questions you asked as well as the answers you published as they seem to be a massive focal point.
If someone came to you and said something like, "We feel that everyone is welcome unless they are black, because we feel that is against our core values." you would have never even imagined to interview or post that. Yet this group, that says the same thing except anti - Republican, you allow.
Kelsonus Sep 30th 2011 6:42AM
Only in make believe can Progressivism work
CavalierX Sep 30th 2011 7:29AM
I play Warcraft to escape the idiocy of the real world. Thanks for screwing that up.
Paws Sep 30th 2011 7:35PM
Two thumbs up!
Nagaina Sep 30th 2011 8:20AM
::dryly::
I learn a new meaning of the term "ad hominem" every day, it seems. Now it seems to mean "espousing political and social principles with which I disagree."
How's this: I'm not a member of Wreck List, principally because I'm a roleplayer and that's the one thing they don't really do. Otherwise? I'm the Libbiest Liberal That Ever Libbed Liberally, High Queen of the Kingdom of Greater Liberality. When I selected my guild, I looked for two things: roleplaying focus, and an indication that I wasn't going to be spending my time surrounded by racist, sexist, homophobic asshats. I found that in my current guild, which is extremely roleplaying friendly and includes, in the very first paragraph of its guild bylaws, the following statement:
"Selfishness, aggressiveness, flaming people because of gender/ethnic/racial/orientation issues, sexism, and disrespect to Guildmates are all signs of an attitude that the Guild does not condone.
We do have a in-game channel and a voice chat system in place. Humor and friendly teasing are acceptable, and profanity is not prohibited. However, respect should always be maintained - genuinely offensive and abusive language, such as egregiously racist, sexist, or homophobic comments is not tolerated."
These are not ad hominem personal attacks. These are descriptions of real-world behaviors that many guilds, not just explicitly liberal-progressive ones, find completely unacceptable, period, full stop. If that excludes those who practice such attitudes from membership in a given guild...well, frankly, that's the guild's right to reject such things from their communities and to call it what it is when they do it. Generic softheaded kumbayaism is all well and good but eventually you will have to decide what is and is not acceptable to you at a guild community level, and those principles will require specific definition and enforcement.
samhain Sep 30th 2011 8:31AM
As a European , a Dutch citizen largely politically neutral person (I agree with both sides just as much as I disagree on certain topics), I find it interesting to read both the article but also the comments because it a) gives me some insight in the American political climate and even though this could (some might argue should?) be learned from other resources on the internet it does actually work for me because b) it goes to show how diverse the player base is and I find that culturally (anthropologically even) interesting.
Then again, and this is NOT a critique, to me -and I might be mistaken- the whole American political landscape (extremists not considered) in general feels more "right" than our most "right-leaning" governing parties. In Holland Mr. Obama would be labelled a "rightwing extremist" by the majority of the mainly socialist or liberal Dutch demographic. I am not joking.
My way of placing the article and it's theme in a broader context by giving an outsider's perspective might just make it more digestible for people who are personally offended by it? There is still hope for idealism ;)
StClair Sep 30th 2011 2:32PM
The goalposts have moved over time. Many of Ronald Reagan's positions and policies are now considered leftward of his party. We won't even mention Goldwater.
Panteleone Sep 30th 2011 8:32AM
Intellectual dishonesty makes baby Panteleone sad. :(
@Tom:
You don't allow racism, sexism, or homophobia. You also don't allow right-sided talking points.
You claim no relationship between these items aside from exclusion, but what you conveniently avoid mentioning is *why* they are excluded. You don't say it, but you clearly and plainly equate racism, sexism, and homophobia with the talking points of the right. It's classic disparagement by association, and it's highly dishonest - intentionally or not - to sit there and claim anything else.
As an aside, I also must voice my discouragement at this rare error in the usually solid judgement of Wow Insider management regarding column topics. Perhaps it was an editorial gaffe in allowing so much anti-right snark to remain in the raw article before it was posted. In any event, I hope political topics are avoided in the future. They do nothing positive in this context.
Tom Sep 30th 2011 5:10PM
Be careful about throwing "you" around like that, Panteleone.
"You don't allow racism, sexism, or homophobia. You also don't allow right-sided talking points."
I don't lead a guild, so I'm not in position to disallow anything. None of my characters are even in a guild at all, for that matter.
"You don't say it, but you clearly and plainly equate racism, sexism, and homophobia with the talking points of the right."
I think you mean that the person being interviewed did.
"You claim no relationship between these items aside from exclusion, but what you conveniently avoid mentioning is *why* they are excluded."
Again, I'm not dkosmama. She did, however, mention why they're excluded - they find racism, sexism, and homophobia morally objectionable, and conservative talking points cause drama. Perhaps she does equate them, but that's a guess on the reader's part.
She might equate them, she might not - it cannot be determined whether or not she does through the words she used. Intellectual honesty is about admitting the difference between what she said and what you think she might have said. If someone can't read the article without adding insertions of their own, then they're not being intellectually honest.
Kurash Sep 30th 2011 5:41PM
"Intellectual honesty is about admitting the difference between what she said and what you think she might have said. If someone can't read the article without adding insertions of their own, then they're not being intellectually honest."
Very well said, Tom.
Panteleone Sep 30th 2011 8:48AM
I should clarify, you equate the level of offensiveness of racism, sexism, and homophobia with righty talking points. You morally equate them. A small point, but a relevant one.