Skip to Content
10-09-2011 @ 12:05PM
BOY.YOU THERE. BOY.BOY, QUIT ALL THIS SCURRYING AROUND.
10-09-2011 @ 12:18PM
An actual question, here:I know that 'Mists of Pandaria' had some kind of tag in the copyright that meant it was a piece of Software. I don't know much more about it than that though... so I gotta ask.Has anyone thought that this might turn out to be some kind if Smartphone game, rather than an expansion to WoW? With all the premium apps they're developing, like the Auction House app, and wanting to gain subscribers to some kind of higher-tier Battle.net account on top of Warcraft subscriptions, a bundle that includes a Smartphone Pandaren game with the AH app and whatever else they got would go a long way towards bringing tons of people in to pay that extra $2 a month (or whatever it costs).
10-09-2011 @ 12:25PM
There's been all kinds of speculation as to what Mists of Pandaria truly is; the smartphone app possibility has been discussed as well. But we won't know until Blizzard tells us.In theory, we'll know in less than two weeks. ^_^
10-09-2011 @ 12:26PM
I believe that was brought up. The filing also consists of manuals, discs, and things which would coincide with a physical release.
10-09-2011 @ 1:00PM
@ Drakkenfyre -Ah, good point, thank you - I'd forgotten about the physical stuff in the trademark application. So odds are good it's either going to be an expansion or another separate game, and I doubt the latter. ^_^
10-09-2011 @ 1:15PM
YOU!YES, YOU!STAND STILL, LADDIE!
10-09-2011 @ 1:36PM
The theory that I heard that I liked was that perhaps Blizz was doing an electronic version of their card game, like Magic Online. It could tie in well enough with the title.But I don't know, no way to know until they tell us, really.
10-09-2011 @ 1:46PM
BOY.YOU KISS THAT GIRL.YOU KISS THAT GIRL THIS INSTANT.
10-09-2011 @ 1:55PM
Fuck Im falling down all these speculations ...............
10-09-2011 @ 2:19PM
I haven't seen anybody mention the possibility of a fourth Warcraft game. Incredibly, ridiculously unlikely, but it's still something cool to consider.
10-09-2011 @ 4:06PM
Unless they have managed to copyright another name without anyone finding out (very unlikely) it's basically come down to either Mists of Pandaria being the next expansion or the next expansion will be unnamed at Blizzcon. There's no way they will announce an expansion name that hasn't been copyrighted and time is running out fast if MoP is not the expansion. I think the non-expansion ideas all seem to be stretches while it being the expansion seems highly likely.
10-09-2011 @ 3:43PM
Yeah a WC4 would be amazing of course.I feel confident that we'll know what it is after Blizzcon. Not too much longer now.
10-09-2011 @ 3:48PM
Boy Man God Sh*t?What? No Phish phans here? =(
10-09-2011 @ 7:38PM
I'm about to throw a bathtub through your wall.
10-09-2011 @ 9:00PM
Regarding, Phish:My friends don't charge me to listen to them jam, and they actually write songs, so no, no fans of crappy "prog" rock bands here.
10-09-2011 @ 9:30PM
I love prog. Not much of a Phish fan, personally, but Rush? Kansas? Jethro Tull? Sign me up.
10-09-2011 @ 11:11PM
Brother, let it be known that I previously imparted my misgivings as to the safety of the steps.
10-09-2011 @ 11:13PM
Brother, let it be known that I expressed on a previous occasion my misgivings as to the safety of the steps.
First time? A confirmation email will be sent to you after submitting.
Members enter your username and password.
Enter your AOL or AIM screenname and password.
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.