Shifting Perspectives: Reconsidering Wild Growth

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

10-11-2011 @ 4:40PM

Allison Robert said...

1. Ah, true. Twitterati were hip to the header image before it went live. Here's your biscuit!

2. I didn't realize it for a bit because my Grid only includes the first 5 or 6 letters in a player's name, but when I did, it was glorious.

3. I definitely think it's the sort of change they're not making lightly -- from what GC said, they looked at it independent of the numbers that Tranquility was (p)adding to druid healing -- but overall I'm actually not too put out that they feel they've got to nerf Wild Growth. WG is just too good. But WG's numbers, I'd argue, really aren't the issue so much as its status as kind of an all-purpose dial for buffing or nerfing druid raid healing, which I think signifies something's a bit troublesome with how the spec operates.

4. I have to admit I'm more worried about what'll happen to Rejuv in the run-up to the next expansion. HOTs that scale with both haste and crit are problematic to balance given the nature of raid damage in the game.

Add your comments

Your comments:

Remember me

E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.