Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-17-2011 @ 5:20PM
Noah said...
They shouldn't let us see the deathwing fight. That's what I loved about ICC; they never let US test the lich king, they just let us test every other boss. I know I don't have to test him, but IMHO, it'd be a lot better if they just tested the big guy themselves, and let us test every other boss.
Reply
10-17-2011 @ 5:50PM
Andrew said...
I'm not a fan of it either, but with how unique and different the mechanics are supposed to be for his encounters I can't imagine any good would come from Blizz not testing those fights on a public server before hand.
10-17-2011 @ 6:35PM
(cutaia) said...
They didn't let us test Sinestra, and that led to people at Blizzard literally having to sit there and make adjustments/hotfixes on the fly as the first guild to attempt it discovered major bugs like, "Oh, our Death Knight almost accidentally one shot her with Dark Simulacrum."
I don't think it's fair to ask Blizzard to forgo their quality control -- and be forced to be "on call" and ready 24/7 for whenever a guild does reach Deathwing to monitor it as they fight -- just so that the first few guilds who reach them can feel like it's a mystery.
Especially when those guilds will then turn around and post the exact same videos that you wanted the rest of the population protected from anyway.