Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-20-2011 @ 10:37AM
EverythingRuned said...
I don't understand people that are opposed to introducing a fourth tree/something that adds new role (healing/tanking) capabilities to classes.
If they add tanking for rogues, and you don't want to tank on your rogue, don't. Sure, I'd be upset if they removed a spec and replaced it with tanking, but they're not going to do that.
If I really think hard, I could see a lot of pures take on healing/tanking roles, flavor-wise. Not sure how they'd pull it off without suffering from even more homogenization than already exists, though.