The Care and Feeding of Warriors: Best things about warriors

We talked about how specializations will work for us warrior folks in Mists of Pandaria last week, so this week I wanted to ground us. So I turned to the lovely folks on Twitter and asked them what they thought we should talk about. Some of the topics they suggested would make full-fledged columns of their own, but others can be handled in bite-sized chunks. That's what I'm going to do today.
Please remember you can always find me on twitter at @matthewwrossi if you want to pose me a question. I'll do my best to answer one way or another.
@Neener_nina asked: what race/gender combinations look best in plate? For both factions?
Well, it's no secret I'm a sucker for Tauren. I generally think that big, blocky races look the best in plate because it allows for all the detail to really show. But to be fair, let's do a best to worst ranking for both factions, completely and totally biased, and let you see what I think and why.
Horde races
- Tauren Both male and female Tauren have excellent animations, look big and imposing and show off a lot of detail in their gear.
- Blood Elves Female Blood Elves have very good combat animations and are generally the go-to gender for anyone playing this race, but Belf males are surprisingly well animated and combine sleek with muscular. Sure, their faces irritate me, but that's what helms are for.
- Orcs Always a fan favorite, but for my money, Tauren do everything they do better than they do it. Orc females look better in plate to me because they stand up more directly.
- Trolls I don't like Troll females, personally (although a lot of awesome people I've known over the years played Troll females) and don't think they look good in plate. Troll males are better, but not much better. Trolls take the Horde tendency to slouch to a ridiculous extreme.
- Forsaken I'd have ranked these a lot higher, especially Forsaken female models, who do some of the best combat animations in the game. But I hate the "bones poking out of my armor" look, and there's only ever been one Forsaken male I could stand. Hope you're doing well, Vish.
- Goblins I hate the Goblin model. Just hate it. It's got a very detailed look, and I can understand why other players like it, but I don't at all.

- Draenei The race I tanked on all through Wrath and my favorite race in the game. Combines the Orc massive build with the Human posture. Draenei females also look really nice in plate, but I'm a sucker for Draenei males. They look like tanks.
- Worgen My current highest-level Alliance warrior is a Worgen. I think Worgen males are incredibly well designed. Worgen females look good as long as you have helmets turned off. I'm not a fan of the Worgen female face.
- Night Elves Night Elf females look awesome as tanks. Night Elf males work well (they have linebacker builds) except for their disturbingly enormous hands. I don't like those hands, I will admit.
- Gnomes I love their animations and how they look in plate, especially Gnome females. They just look like they're having fun swinging gigantic weapons at you.
- Dwarves Dwarf females look good to me, solid. Dwarf males look like a jar of smashed expletive deleteds.
- Humans I played a human until race change came up. In terms of pure aesthetics, Humans commit the worst two crimes. Human females are boring, boring, and then boring some more. Human males are boring and ugly.
@keithschon suggests: Have you considered doing a write-up on why someone might consider playing a warrior if their main is another class? Or possibly why someone should return to their warrior in 4.3 if they have moved on to another class in this expansion cycle?
Well, no, but I will now, Keith. Why would you play a warrior if your main is another class?
- Warriors are better than every other class in the game put together.
- Did you read the first line of this bullet list? Go back and read that again.
- I'm serious.
- No, really, there's really nothing else to be said. Warriors are the best class in the game, just accept it.
- I don't understand why you feel like there needs to be more said about this.
If you're used to playing more diffuse classes like paladins or druids, or classes that rely on gimmicks or themes like death knights, rogues or one of the ranged classes, the simplicity and straightfoward nature of the warrior is a positive boon.
If you played a warrior only to switch to another class and are wondering why you should switch back, well, it depends on if you're enjoying your new class or not. At present, warriors aren't looking to change much in patch 4.3. But if you miss hurling yourself into combat, leaping or charging from mob to mob, and a pure physical playstyle that relies on nothing but the class itself -- no stealth, no magic of any kind, no fancy extra resource systems -- then the warrior will always be waiting for you with blood streaming down a scarred face.
@Pompitus asked, also I think something was said at blizzcon about arms being the only spec with slam, what will fury use in its place?
We don't know yet, Pompitus. My money's on the Wild Strike ability we saw in the fury ability mock-up, but we simply don't know. It's too soon, Pompitus.
@Ash_O_o suggests Maybe not this week, but a post on good weapons to pick up while leveling for those w/o heirlooms? (wtb 1h str dps heirloom)
I personally like leveling without an heirloom weapon, because it allows me to pick up solid upgrades as I level. I probably will tackle this subject in more depth later (as I will @vicTORIrush's question about fury DPS and UI mods), but for now, here are some candidates for one-handed weapons to look for as you level up. This is not a complete list.
Next week, I hope to discuss at length why melee DPS (especially warriors) have suffered in a lot of Cataclysm fights and why DPS potential isn't always DPS realized.
Filed under: Warrior, Analysis / Opinion, (Warrior) The Care and Feeding of Warriors






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
Wark Nov 5th 2011 8:10PM
We... Disagree.
/lawyer
paulmewis Nov 5th 2011 8:43PM
Well, I can't say I agree. That's what lost me my first 10 cases.
Moghar Nov 6th 2011 3:59AM
Except there's no case. Warriors are the best. Period.
Wark Nov 6th 2011 4:21AM
@Moghar
Commenting on parts of the race selection.
anuillae Nov 5th 2011 8:12PM
*Idly wonders if Rossi was so impressed by the name 'Pompitus' that he had to use it twice in such a short space of time.*
If I was writing anything about Pompitus, I would use Pompitus as often as Pompitus could possibly fit in. Pompitus.
Quaza Nov 5th 2011 9:42PM
My guess is that is was a failed "Too soon, Executus." joke.
SR Nov 6th 2011 8:06AM
If you were writing TO Pompitus ABOUT Pompitus on using Pompitus on every instance Pompitus would fit into sentences involving Pompitus, you can definitely fit more Pompiti into your Pompitus-oriented sentences.
Elwoods Nov 7th 2011 7:34AM
Thats just Pompitus!
Big Shoe Nov 8th 2011 7:27AM
Maybe Mr. Rossi speaks of the Pompitus of Love. :-)
bountyhunterah Nov 5th 2011 8:16PM
Just to quote FrostHeim....
'The hunter class is the premiere hero class in WoW. Hunters are so important that Blizzard designed nine support classes just to enhance the hunter class experience.'
sorry sir, your warrior class has been beaten to the punch :P
Luke Nov 5th 2011 8:18PM
"The rage mechanic means that warriors scale exceptionally well with gear."
I bind you Mathew Rossi, you may never write another disparaging article about the failures of rage mechanics. I bind you Mathew Rossi, you may never write another disparaging article about the failures of rage mechanics. I bind you Mathew Rossi, you may never write another disparaging article about the failures of rage mechanics. I bind you Mathew Rossi, you may never write another disparaging article about the failures of rage mechanics....
Bikhai Nov 6th 2011 3:08AM
Isn't that kind of the point? Rage is a failure because it causes warriors to scale too well with gear? Now that we're toward the last tier of the expansion, it's a benefit, but for a while after the stat resets every expansion, rage gimps us.
I've been away from the game for a while now, but my memory is that rage has resulted in warriors receiving damage nerfs nigh on every patch the last couple expansions.
Luke Nov 6th 2011 3:21AM
@Bikhai
Given the nature of this article I assumed this comment was tongue in cheek. Unless memory fails me Matt himself has commented previously on the numerous times he has had to revisit this problem with rage mechanics and how every expansion Blizzard sets out with the goal to fix those problems but never does.
My reference to a 90's movie about high school witches, (though subtle and dated) was intended as a humorous juxtaposition as an attempt to highlight this absurdity. Or something something pretentious blah blah they're never going to fix this etc etc...
Angus Nov 6th 2011 7:45AM
Luke: Referencing "The Craft" will always work with me.
Ah to be young and utterly in lust with Robin Tunney...
Those eyes, that wicked smile...
Wait, what were we talking about again? Damn old man syndrome.
Oh yea, I did get that Wolverine, er, Rossi needs to point out the great "Warrior scaling nerfs of '11, '10, '09, etc..." in this article as to negatives for the class.
Finally: Male blood elf animations are actually very impressive for warriors. Especially when Fury for looks. The coolness factor when arms and then spin the weapon around their back to reset it and ready it for another attack is amazing. As for the helmet, mine has it not displayed. It'd mess up the hair. Anybody got a scrunchy?
Luke Nov 6th 2011 7:38PM
Scrunchy Of Unrelenting Awesomeness
+500 Strength
Activate to pull your hair back, increasing your armor "exponentially".
"Let's get down to business!"
Erthshade Nov 5th 2011 8:27PM
"Worgen females look good as long as you have helmets turned off. I'm not a fan of the Worgen female face."
Wait, what? You don't like the face but advise hiding the helmet anyway?
Arrohon Nov 5th 2011 9:15PM
I believe the worgen have a horrible habit of not completely fitting in their clothes. You might have a snout or hair go through the helm which looks quite horrifying. It's better to simply look at the face than to look at 1/2 helm 1/2 face.
razion Nov 5th 2011 8:28PM
"Worgen females look good as long as you have helmets turned off. I'm not a fan of the Worgen female face."
I believe you would then mean "have helments turned on"? Otherwise that doesn't make much sense. (However by the time I finish this post this will have likely have been edited. But just incase, I'll leave it there.)
As for myself, here's how I list 'em:
Forsaken - My ideal race. Poor hair selection and male two-handed animation prevents me from sticking one, however, as I like to alt into Arms quite often. I love them for SMF and Prot.
Orcs - Again, I have issues with the two-handed animation. One handed animation is fine with swords, but otherwise I don't care for it. Transmogrification makes the old Huge Shoulder issue mute, so I may see myself using more orc characters.
Tauren - Wins in the animations department, but I really don't care for the model. I like my head to be actually above my shoulders, but eh.
Trolls - Good second in terms of two-hander animations, but I can't stand the single at all, which limits me to arms a lot, which can get stale. I have no problem with the posture or the feet, though I wouldn't miss them if they left.
Blood Elves - Have the two-handed animations I wish the Forsaken had. Posture bothers me, so I spend a lot of time moving, which as a warrior actually works.
Goblins - They rank lowest for me too. I love the combat animations, but everything else seems to miss for me. If I could take their animations to other races, I would.
I tend to roll Arms Trolls and SMF/Prot Forsaken for warriors, Horde-side. I wouldn't roll a Troll if Forsaken had decent 2H animations, however.
Alliance
Night elves - Great animations, although everything else tends to miss. Not being human puts them ahead somehow.
Humans - 2H animation is both good and bad, 1H triumphs. I don't like being "just a human", though. No issues with anything else.
Gnomes - They win in terms of animations, however their muscle build leaves much to be desired (size is fine).
Dwarves - Mixed feelings about the animations. Armor doesn't show too well for them, and I don't like current beard selection very much (wishing the old beta model beard made it in, but alas).
Worgen - Animations are ... okay. They retain the 'back' issue of the Tauren, which prevents me from getting into them. Running also feels I have a limp.
Tend to roll Arms Gnomes and Prot Night Elves. Occasionally a SMF Dwarf or Prot Human will pop up.
Elzam Nov 5th 2011 8:29PM
I think Blood Elf warriors in particular look a bit strange. Maybe it's just tier 12, but it sits on their shoulders oddly like someone's trying on daddy's clothes. It's just odd, considering their other class combinations don't have this problem with their gear.
Goblins are an acquired taste and I think it's because we're so used to staring at shoulders as the distinguishing mark of a suit of armor, and Goblins instead focus on having massive helms (seriously, put the Tier 10 Hunter hat on a Goblin for funsies sometime).
If you want to be Fury though, Female Forsaken should be #1 on Horde being all flippy ninja.
Deathknighty Nov 5th 2011 8:56PM
Could we ban this person please? :)