Skip to Content
11-16-2011 @ 1:32PM
Does anyone else think a 10 man version would be better? Less afk and griefers possibly?
11-16-2011 @ 2:16PM
The raid composition for a 25-man raid is much more similar to the proportion of people who play the different class roles. You also have a better chance of getting all the raid buffs and utility covered with 25 random people instead of just 10.I think this is what Blizzard's reasoning was.
11-16-2011 @ 7:18PM
You could never run a 10 man version and a 25 man version at the same time. 25 man queues would go to the mooooon. 10 man queues wouldn't be any better...You would have a similar problem with queues for dungeons.. not enough tanks/healers10 Man: 25 Man:2 Tanks 2 Tanks3 Healers 5 (or 6?) Healers5 DPS 17/18 DPSThis keeps the queue times lower. Sure you're more likely to run into undesirable people of all shapes and sizes... but you're going to be waiting considerably less.
11-16-2011 @ 7:19PM
Oh boo. Guess you cant space things out.
11-16-2011 @ 10:57PM
I understand the proportional argument that 25
11-17-2011 @ 12:01AM
You are more likely to have at least one semi-competent leader among 25 people than among 10.
First time? A confirmation email will be sent to you after submitting.
Members enter your username and password.
Enter your AOL or AIM screenname and password.
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.