Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-17-2011 @ 10:37AM
Noyou said...
I think Matt is definitely on point. I also feel like you bring up a valid point as well Chris. Each time blizzard nerfs something or gives us a quality of life change, it's not to make anything easier so much as it is to make it more accessible to "the masses". With this brings a sense of entitlement and contempt. If blizzard wants to continuously add subs they realize they have to keep changing the content, as WoW grows, they have to make the 1-level cap quicker, less daunting. Some players will look at 90 levels as a huge challenge. Some will look at it as a great journey. I know when I am choosing a game, I would rather take the one with more levels than less. More doesn't always mean better but to me it always seemed like the longer they wanted you to play, the more there will be to do. It seems like with 4.3, now more than ever they are listening to what the bulk of players want. With this comes a double edge sword, just because the majority of people want something doesn't always mean it will be the best for the game in the long run. Time will tell.