Aiding the Alliance: The idle Varian Wrynn

The Alliance faction leaders are simply ... boring. They don't do anything. They are tight springs of potential that are never given the opportunity to leap forth and act. What I've decided to do today is begin a series wherein I lay out what I as an Alliance player feel is lacking in my faction's heroes. There will be no faction fairness here, only what your average Alliance player sees, perceives and experiences and how I feel that can be improved.
Today we look at Varian Wrynn, King of Stormwind.
Who are you?
I love Varian Wrynn. I really do. In his current state, however, he's 100% pure wasted potential. He needs some serious help in a few key places.
First, looking strictly at World of Warcraft, we know absolutely nothing about him. He didn't appear in any of the previous games, either. This man's story, past and present, takes place entirely in extended media -- comics, novels, and so on. Who is he? Why does he deserve to be High King of the Alliance? Why does he deserve our respect? What sort of combat experience does he have? The Trials of the High King quest chain that was discussed at BlizzCon sounds cool and a very good way to get this information to players, but those Trials need to portray real, actual issues Varian is dealing with. Don't just give us Kill 10 Pigs, Kill 20 Cowpigs, Kill 30 Orcpigs. Show this man as someone who is wise and worthy to rule.
If the writers don't want Varian to be intelligent, give him the capability to know when he needs to call on people who are intelligent. Varian Wrynn's being able to say Tyrande, what's your take on this? is an admirable trait. Every leader needs to be able to do that. Varian's being boiled down to I will hit you with my sword so hard!! is not admirable whatsoever.

Speaking of hitting things with swords, can we deal with Varian's rage issues once and for all? Or find a better way to approach it? His anger management problems have been addressed at least three times in varying degrees. Back in the comic, everybody thought he would get better when he cobbled his two halves back together. That didn't do it. In his faction leader short story, we thought his self-realization about his problems would fix it. It didn't. In Wolfheart, he goes through a magical healing process. Will that fix it? Man, I hope so -- but didn't the Blood of Our Fathers short story take place after Wolfheart? So no, I guess even magical cleansing can't help Varian. How many more times do we need to go through this with him?
Seeing Varian pull himself out of his blinding rage only to fall back into it reminds me of an alcoholic -- and in fact, he is an alcoholic in Wolfheart, or at least a horrible drunkard.
Alcoholism is not heroic. Domestic abuse is not heroic. That's the kind of thing that darkens your opinion of a man forever. Anduin is an incredibly brave kid, getting himself away from Varian and departing for the Exodar. There is very little room for second chances when it comes to alcoholism and abuse, and it looks like Varian is on the road to needing his fourth and fifth chances. Just shelve that anger management thing. Give Varian the opportunity to make up for his mistakes and then it's dealt with, it's gone, just ... forget it. Don't turn our High King into a violent deadbeat. Characters like that have their place in fiction, but don't expect readers to respect those people, as we are expected to respect Varian.
Direct his rage at the Horde. Don't inflict it upon the Alliance, and certainly not his own son.
If the creators of this character see his rage issues as one of his defining traits and it's here to stay, he needs a foil. He needs a character at his side who can rein him in before things get bad. He needs a partner who can say Varian, cut that crap out! before he starts hitting people and spittling in their faces, and Varian needs to respect that person enough to listen to them. There is room for an angry, intense, kill-or-be-killed leader, especially when it's a character who has lost as much as Varian has in his lifetime, but he needs someone to play off of. For example ...

While Varian tells Jaina to stop crying and do something, she can tell him that ... sometimes it's okay to cry. Varian and Jaina wield great potential together. They'd become better people through one another's flaws, and they'd be a lot better off helping each other out.
Does their relationship need to be romantic? No, of course not. It could be, sure, but Varian and Jaina are old friends by now. They knew each other when they were kids. Varian was there in Lordaeron when Arthas and Jaina first met. After this many years seeing some seriously dark stuff together, it's perfectly reasonable to expect them to have built strong bonds between one another. Heck, until Genn Greymane resurfaced, Jaina and Varian were the final living rulers of the entire human race. That's significant.
Simple inaction
Varian Wrynn needs to go out into the world more. Again, Trials of the High King will help, but he needs to be more active in general. Garrosh, over the course of Cataclysm, has been out in the field dealing with his commanders and leading the assault on the Alliance. He's been active while the Horde is on the rise. Varian Wrynn, over the course of Cataclysm, stands in the remodeled Stormwind Keep, playing his fiddle while the Alliance burns around him.
Varian could meet Garrosh in battle in the Twilight Highlands. He could rescue Sentinel Hill and drive Vanessa VanCleef away. He could aid in fending off the orcs in Redridge. Varian's inaction in this expansion made signing up with Vanessa VanCleef seem like a damn good idea, because she's completely right. The Alliance is in a miserable state, humanity moreso than anybody else. Humanity, the backbone of the Alliance, seems on the brink of extinction. That's terrifying. Varian isn't doing anything about it but alienating his friends and family.
Go, Varian. Go and do.

I feel we also need to talk about Varian's imagery. Lo'gosh. The Ghost Wolf. Is that cool imagery? Yes. Is it contributing to the Alliance's dislike of Varian Wrynn and the perception of Horde favoritism? Yes. The Alliance looks at High King Lo'gosh and they think Oh jeez, Blizzard loves the Horde so much they're importing it to the Alliance now. Is that the truth? Of course not, but perception is perception. Our High King is being portrayed as an orc -- an orc-hating orc at that.
Thrall is very human, but his actions in support of the Horde speak volumes. As human as he is, Thrall is clearly orc at heart. Thrall built the Horde. Thrall was constantly working to rekindle what it means to be an orc. Varian can't say any of that. Varian doesn't have the swagger he needs to pull off the orcish human thing in the same way Thrall can pull off the opposite.
The Alliance has lacked a hero that has truly embodied the essence of what the Alliance is, humanity especially. The Alliance doesn't need a ghost wolf. Those great big pauldrons Varian wears? We need him to embody those: the lion and the eagle. If Varian can't do it, we need someone who can. As long as our High King is Lo'gosh the orcish human, Alliance players won't respect him. That's not who we are.
Varian suffers from the "world hero" concept that was outlined in a recent dev watercooler. It feels as if faction leaders and their story arcs tend to be written with the whole world in mind rather than one faction. That doesn't work in this game, and it will continue to not work. The game is set up with a clear division along faction lines. We are at war with the other team. If you don't pick a side, if you don't embody what your faction needs, you're nobody.
Neutral figures have never gone over well -- not Tirion Fordring, not Malfurion Stormrage, and certainly not Thrall. Blizzard tried to create a Varian Wrynn palatable to both Horde and Alliance players. The Alliance doesn't need that. The Alliance needs someone that makes us feel good about being who we are. The Alliance needs a representation of itself out on the front lines. Lo'gosh isn't that. Lo'gosh can't be that. Varian Wrynn, however, can be precisely that.
We need a new Lion of Stormwind. We haven't had one since Warcraft II, when Anduin Lothar bit the dust. Warcraft III showed us a catastrophic decline of humanity, and the human race has never recovered from it. We have no paladin order (Tirion Fordring went and disbanded it) or any meaningful order of warriors at all. All of our heroes exist only in the form of stone monuments scattered throughout the world. Our few heroes who are still alive have been cast out into other planets entirely. Danath Trollbane stands in his keep in Hellfire Peninsula filing paperwork. Turalyon is Light-knows-where.
Bolvar Fordragon is the closest we ever came to having a Lion of Stormwind again, and that was produced almost completely by players -- Bolvar never really did much until Wrath of the Lich King realized how we envisioned him all along. Our desire for a human hero was so great that we made one on our own built entirely on his ability to clear dragons out of the throne room. Bolvar was taken from us, and he sits on the Frozen Throne now. The hero we made is gone. Varian is no replacement. The Ghost Wolf is not the Lion. Let the Horde keep their wolves; we don't want them.You will stand trial for your crimes. You will stand in Capital City, in chains as the leaders of the Alliance decide your fate, and there you will acknowledge your full defeat. -- High General Turalyon
Does Varian Wrynn specifically need to be the Lion? No, he doesn't, but he needs to interact with and respect whoever it is, and there must be one.
You know who would make a damn cool lion? Joanna Blueheart. That's a character who understands Alliance warfare. Pull her out of Swamp of Sorrows, slap some commendations on her, give her armor befitting her station, and put her on the Alliance's front line in Mists of Pandaria. Joanna reports to Varian. Varian respects her worth. Everyone is happy. She doesn't need to be a central lore figure. She doesn't need to participate in politics like the faction leaders do. But she needs to be someone that we see and interact with long-term and feel good about.
A better man
Varian Wrynn could be a great character. His core problem is that he's a deeply flawed character, and in no form of media whatsoever have we been given a reason to look past his flaws. He is nothing but flaws. He's at his best when his mouth is shut and he's stabbing a dragon. That's not enough for the High King of the Alliance. Move him beyond some of his flaws. He talks the talk, but he doesn't walk the walk. Prop him up. Make him a better man.
I want to be proud of my king.
Filed under: Analysis / Opinion, Lore
Patch 5.3 interview with Ghostcrawler
Mystery of the Unborn Val'kyr
The latest patch 5.3 news
All of the latest Mists of Pandaria news





Reader Comments (Page 6 of 11)
ElrithCC Dec 8th 2011 2:07PM
Before Thrall went neutral, no faction leader was ever given this amount of development, Horde or Alliance. Thrall was the first, and we're still in that window. I am weary of people making this an issue of favoritism, especially as someone who considers them self an Alliance player since 2004.
This cry of favoritism was a knee jerk spin doctor response borne of fear, seeded in your personal issues with the other faction. And it spread to a point of absurdity, but now it's got some worthwhile criticism at least.
But the issue is still that Thrall has been the first character as a faction leader to receive this level of attention.
Alex Ziebart Dec 8th 2011 2:47PM
Even if you don't include Thrall at all, there's still a significant disparity between factions. Thrall himself does not drive this discussion. There is a real, actual imbalance. If you play through both factions, you'll notice it immediately.
The Forsaken interact heavily with Sylvanas throughout their new zone revamps. Garrosh Hellscream is out there waging war and you're interacting with him. None of the Alliance leaders have that sort of content right now.
Murdertime Dec 8th 2011 5:44PM
If we're going to use the lines of argument some of the people
claiming Horde bias have been using, you have situation where there
was almost no development of the Horde Leaders for a siginficant
portion of the game that wasn't initiated by the players themselves.
Up until the Mag'har questline in BC, Thrall had less of an in game
presence than Fandral Staghelm. While Bolvar was off slaying Dragons,
Thrall was handing out a lowbie quest. While Fandral was yelling at
you because he was a jackass, Thrall was sitting his throne room.
After the Alliance focus in WotLK, where the Horde got sidekick quest
after sidekick quest, we've had for the first time ever an expansion
where they've actually put some of the Horde in the spotlight for the
first time and we've had this protacted tantrum about how Blizzard
doesn't love the Alliance anymore. After 6 years of Alliance focused
storylines and Alliance focused development, we have nine months where
the Horde experience is finally not treated as an afterthought and we
get this.
An expansion where we get people ranting about the ubiquity
of a character who actually appears less in the expansion than
Malfurion, a major Alliance Lore Figure.
Even in the theoretically Horde focused expansion, Alliance Lore figures are getting more screen time. And with MoP and the bitching that's gone on, I expect the Horde to be sidelined yet again.
Hobstadt Dec 8th 2011 6:14PM
Malfurion has never been Alliance. In Warcraft 3, the Night Elves were allied with the Humans and with the Orcs, and later also with the Blood Elves.
Malfurion was gone before the Night Elves and Orcs became enemies. And when he appeared in WoW? Neutral. Not Alliance. The same as Rhonin, Khadgar and Tirion, neither of which have ever been Alliance in WoW.
And unlike Thrall, (who is the Aspect of Earth and will side with the Horde eventually, as said by Metzen), Malfurion will never return to the Alliance. Because then the Cenarion Circle will join the Alliance too, and that will NEVER happen.
Neutral is neutral and don't CARE how the Alliance-Horde fight goes, regardless of the fate of Ashenvale or Plaguelands. Which is good news for the Horde, tbh. They can cut down how many trees, kill how many Night Elves and plague as many towns as they want, without having to deal with pesky druids or nosy paladins. :-)
Al Dec 8th 2011 6:20PM
Vanilla - "Well, everyone already knows the Horde leaders from WC3 so let's build up the Dwarves." "I wanna voice Thrall, give him some lines!" "Yes, Chris."
BC - "Blood Elves. lolretcon. Blood Elves. Thrall, Geyah, Garrosh, Saurfangs, Rexxar. Blood Elves. Neutral Khadgar. Blood Elves. Oh, and have the Draenei guy briefly appear to save the Blood Elves."
Wrath - "Taunka. Plague. Curse of the flesh. Saurfangs. Dead Bolvar. Garrosh. Ner'zhul. Forsaken. Crazy Varian. Forsaken. Arthas. Neutral Uther."
Cata - "lolalliance. Malfurion and 4 Aspects have no idea what to do if Thrall isn't around. Ancients couldn't care less about Ashenvale. Garrosh, Sylvanas, Vol'Jin. Vol'Jin again. Babysitting Anduin. Off-Screen Crazy Fandral/Benedictus/Maiev." "Wait.. according to WowHead, some guy named Muln is actually head of the Earthern Ring." "Meh - keep everything about Thrall the Wonder-Orc and have this... Moon.. guy show up once at Thrall's wedding. More than one Shaman, what a ridiculus concept."
Murdertime Dec 8th 2011 6:38PM
I would one day like a proper explanation of why neutral based ubiquity is only a bad thing when it's an Alliance character.
Hobstadt Dec 8th 2011 7:39PM
Well... apart from the fact that it's WIERD, storywise, that the Druids (which are 90% Night Elves) DON'T CARE that the Horde is razing the Night Elf homeland and that BOTH orders of former Alliance Paladins don't seem to have any problems being friendly with a nation of Undead that melts hundreds of human civilians alive, I'm not saying that it's bad.
What I AM saying is STOP COUNTING NEUTRAL CHARACTERS AS BELONGING TO EITHER SIDE!
Tirion and Rhonin and everyone under them have officially left the Alliance. And Malfurion never belonged to it in the first place. And even if he had, his action proves that he will not side with either faction. And even if he would, he had to step down from being the leader of the Cenarion Circle, and that's not gonna happen. Ofc, Thrall will return to the Horde, according to Metzen, and then he may need to step being the Earthen Ring leader, but he may have to quit that job anyway since he is Aspect of the Earth now. (And why the Nether is the Aspect of the Earth gonna rejoin the Horde, I might ask? :-P )
You don't get the luxury of having every Alliance druid, paladin and mage being just as allied with the Horde as they are with the Alliance (or more in the paladin and druid cases, since their neutrality is giving Lordaeron and Ashenvale to the Horde) and yet claim that they are Alliance people, look how much place the Alliance get to take in every expansion! Unfair! Favoritism! :-D
ElrithCC Dec 8th 2011 8:22PM
I do play both factions. You get to interact with Sylvanas, but Worgen get to interact with Greymane and Crowley. I think this score board mentality is deeply flawed and seeded in reactionary logic, MMOs end up working with very slow pacing, and you can take a microscope and look at a year and end up making the game seem incredibly slanted when you ignore the past and the future.
I don't think people's complaining about faction problems will ultimately matter, there was going to be a time in the future when Alliance heroes are given a more in depth and engaging place in the game, now people are just going to think it was a bone thrown to them for complaining.
Until now, there was never any engaging mechanics in WOW in the quest lines that involved the leaders. It's still a new feature. And because it started with some Horde characters, people are over reacting.
Ultimately, people are thinking about this from the perspective of their personal bias, instead of what it's like to be in Blizzard's shoes. Blizzard doesn't set out to give equal time and effort to every personal interest in the game, they go with what they're passionate about. The Horde needed a lot of development, and they made the mistake of getting too enthusiastic while MMO time scales leave us sitting still in the storyline for a year.
Al Dec 9th 2011 2:18AM
"I would one day like a proper explanation of why neutral based ubiquity is only a bad thing when it's an Alliance character."
Because we keep seeing our long-term lore characters written out for it. Khadgar, Uther, Tirion, Malfurion. All gone and never coming back, even though that leaves Malfurion and Tirion staring at Ashenvale and Tirisfal with "Durrr, should we do something?" expressions. Thrall? They've made it very clear he was only neutral so he could be totally awesome and have both sides gush over him. And guess what Metzen had to say?
"One day, come on, your Warchief is coming back. Right? There's more with Thrall." Yeah, so much for his neutrality.
Sinthar Dec 9th 2011 9:40AM
Hi folks,
God theres a lot of charged emotion here. Strange that Horde players seem to be on both sides of it.
Anyhow heres my take on the whole situation - whether you like it or not. Btw I do not and do not intend to ever buy or read a wow book/comic etc. As far as I am concerned if Blizz wants us to know the lore for WOW then it should be IN GAME.
1) Horde leaders are percieved to be a lot more active than Alliance leaders - and that imho is true. The only time I have EVER seen the alliance leaders move out of their thronerooms and/or actually do something was in special events - Battle for undercity (and there the Horde leaders did the same). At the same time,Thrall is everywhere - in the past, and present, and reguardless of people saying 'he turned neutral', he is AN ORC, and therefore part of the horde. If he truely had gone 'neutral' then stopping the alliance/horde war would be his main concern, and his actions would certainly not been pass the 'warchief' title to the more warlike orc he knows.
As a only alliance (at least now) player, I know the actions and names of ALL the horde leaders. I CANNOT EVEN NAME the current (if there is one at all) dwarf, gnome,gilians or elf leaders.
2) Alliance storeys tend to be written and stop. No continuation or development past the initial point. For example, The dranai and gnomes. The 'retaking' of their hometown was pathetic really compared with the troll storey. And the dranai lore vs the blood elves lore, also has little comparison.
3) Personally I care little about the zones changing hands - that is more like a war - the front lines shift back and forth.
4) the alliance questing is dubious at best in the 'contested' zones. The alliance get to run about poop scooping while the horde actually attack. Or even if we get related quests it always seems to be about how 'alliance are retreating/being beaten back' never about counter attacking.
Reguardless if you think im right or wrong (or the myriad of positions between), that has been my view for quite some time, and coupled with the never ending grinds, meant I have quit wow, at least for now, possibly perminently. A more stiring alliance storeyline would have at least delayed this for me (as I do like the lore), but as it is, there is far too little, and what little there is, is far too mediocre to keep my interest.
@ Alex
Great article, nice to see somebody actually coming out with some sort of reasoned rational argument for the alliance for a change, rather than see horde supporters just dimissing anything as 'alliance qq'. Personally Im not sure if the changes you have suggested would even be enough - but even the fact that blizz had started trying would be good news. I would also like to see the converse point of view, about the lesser know horde leaders (ie not Garrosh or sylvanus)
Sinthar Dec 9th 2011 9:40AM
@Murdertime
Thrall had his own INSTANCE as well as huge ammounts of lore in TBC. How you can compare the two I have no idea. How many alliance leaders have you gone back in time to help IN TBC? It was sort of balanced by the arthas COT later as far as I was concerned - but if you want to go back to TBC era and then talk about - Find a sodding time machine.
huan Dec 8th 2011 2:07PM
You're absolutely right about varian being too orcy. The whole "anti-thrall" thing really doesn't work so well. But it's not all peaches and cream on the other side. A lot of hordies signed up on thrall's new vision of the horde we got in WC3. Now we have our own beserker in charge of thing. Garrosh is squandering our strength and straining vital friendships.
As a darkspear fanboy how am i supposed to get behind a leader my boss wants to see dead? We're sworn to follow thrall and he's gone off to be the aspect of earth. He's too big for the horde now, he belongs to the world. Do I follow garrosh simply because he'll strike me dead if i don't? Am i waiting for an opportunity to eliminate him?
Frankly I can't wait for MoP to come out and the alliance giving us everything we deserve. With a new front at play I bet you're armies will find us quite over extended. Perhaps we'll even see support from the constituent races of the horde wane so the orcs can learn they are not the entire horde. Best case scenario: our rage-aholics meet in battle and destroy each other. Then the hero you deserve can step up and we can go back to being misunderstood monsters.
The time has come for garrosh to reap what he sowed and we all stand to gain from it.
Xantenise Dec 8th 2011 2:22PM
All of this. Just, all of it.
Lathr Dec 8th 2011 5:19PM
Right the hell on, brother.
StClair Dec 8th 2011 5:54PM
Big ups to ya, mon.
Zanathos Dec 9th 2011 2:39AM
You're supposed to hate Garrosh. He's the answer to suggestions to make Thrall more "orc-like". Garrosh is basically the grim, gritty, serious version of Thrall people used to call for. By giving people what they thought they wanted, you can experience why it sucks and make Thrall's eventually return more satisfying.
Garrosh is the New Coke of Warchiefs.
Sinfulle Dec 8th 2011 2:11PM
With his split personality and unceasing rage, I wish Blizzard would simply give Varian the violent end he wishes for since he cannot resolve the conflicts within himself(or the ones he has with family). At the present point in the game, and with even more faction conflict to arise in the future, the Alliance needs someone at the forefront with clear resolve and direction. A leader divided within himself cannot rally a directionless faction whose opponents grow more organized and aggressive each day.
The Horde replaced it's diplomatic leader with a real war chief. The last time I saw Varian willing to get his hands dirty was in the Ulduar cinematic. Azeroth isn't the school playground, yet Varian seems like the kid who slings hollow threats at others "You think you can take me?! Oh ya?! You and what army?!" Bolvar fought dragons in the throne room, Varian was almost killed by ONE faceless one. For someone who is supposed to be a badass hardened pit fighter, Varian sure does seem like a flimsy paper doll.
Joanna Blueheart(even though her camp contains Rebecca Blackman) is someone I could see as a military leader, as well as John Keeshan(despite him being Rambo I had fun fighting along side him).
Alliance players are tired of grasping at straws. We don't seem to have an official war cry or an official leader. Yet we are suppose to march off to war in the near future.
Royblazeheart Dec 8th 2011 2:34PM
That "faceless" dragonkin was a drakonid that was armored from head to tail, and to further improve his defenses, his armor was warded. He was also described as being huge, with two axes as his weapons. Bolvar managed to take out several dragonkin because guess what? They weren't as nearly formidable an opponent as that drakonid was.
clundgren Dec 8th 2011 2:54PM
Plus, Bolvar>Varian. Admit it.
Although, tip for Bolvar: next time someone tries to gas you, use your bubble. Bad paladin.
Boobah Dec 8th 2011 3:56PM
@Roy: I have no idea what you're talking about, but Sinfulle is referring to the assassination attempt on Varian in the Alliance's pre-Twilight Highlands quest chain.