The Queue: Winter Veil is coming

I'm going to be spending most of my day today putting together all of the giveaway posts for our annual 12 Days of Winter Veil event. We have a pretty good haul this year. I think FedEx and UPS are getting tired of delivering packages to my house by now.
@Kitsuno asked:
Does Alex think the LFR is good, or bad?
Good. Absolutely. If you asked me that question a few years ago, I would have said it's the dumbest thing Blizzard has ever added to the game ever and it's just catering to casuals, but nowadays? It's fine. It's cool. Let people see content on their own terms. I love it.
araquen asked:
Actually, I'm not sure if this was answered (though I would have to think it was), but what is the purpose of requiring Mail and Plate wearers to first gear Leather and Mail (respectively)? Why not just have the four armor types from the start?
I can see, in Vanilla, that the conversion would be something of an achievement, but nowadays you hit 40 so quickly it seems kind of silly to have the gear conversion.
I'm not sure anybody has addressed this before, and I'm also not sure anybody has bothered to ask. You're right, it doesn't seem to serve a purpose anymore. It's not the same milestone it used to be. But it also hasn't been much of a bother, either.
Why hasn't it changed? Itemization, probably. Cataclysm would have been a good time to tackle revamped low-level itemization and itemize plate for warriors and paladins, mail for hunters and shaman, and all of that sort of thing. Since this wasn't done, it'd probably be a huge pain in the butt to go back and redo quest rewards for levels 1 to 40 all over again.
Maybe Blizzard'll change it eventually. Right now, since it wasn't done in Cataclysm, changing it is probably more trouble than it's worth.
thebl4ckd0g asked:
If I run the Raid Finder, and I don't win anything at all - I still cannot roll on stuff again till the lockout resets next week correct?
Correct.
Wist asked:
Speaking from a RP standpoint, I can understand why the Darkmoon Faire would only crop up at certain times in certain places. After all, it takes time to travel across this big world of ours. Going from Elwynn to Mulgore to Shattrath and back....it takes alot of time.
BUT.
Now they have their own island. Their own permanent base. Now WE go to THEM. ...so what's with the periodic closing?
By artificially limiting their product and the event's availability, they significantly increase excitement and demand. Nobody wants to go to a carnival every day of their lives. If the carnival were around all of the time, you'd get bored of it, and eventually you'd just stop thinking about it. But if it's only around one week out of the month or even less than that? You gotta go while you can, or you'll miss out!
@andy_j0y asked:
Just noticed in Hour of Twilight, those aren't nameless shaman dying is it? It's half the named Earthen ring guys. /cry
Unfortunately, the shaman dying in Hour of Twilight are those named guys we've been questing with this whole expansion. It's sort of depressing, really. We hung out with them in Vashj'ir, Deepholm and Twilight Highlands, then they get murdered unceremoniously in Hour of Twilight. Nobody in the instance even mentions their dying. Pretty lame, if you ask me!
@WickedPissa81 asked:
If you could take your main toon on a RL vacation with you, where would you go?
My main character would hate me, so that would be a really awful vacation. I don't know, maybe New Zealand. I could visit the old sets of the numerous fantasy movies and television shows that have been filmed there. She could try to figure out why humanity has abandoned such wondrous cities and strongholds.
@Derevka asked:
Is the LFR the new WOTLK 10-Man meaning that its 'mandatory' for high-end guilds to run.
High-end raiding is a very strange environment. These raiders absolutely will see the Raid Finder as mandatory. It isn't, but they will approach it as if it is. The high-end raiding culture just has that perception -- if anything could possibly give them an edge, it's mandatory. There are no exceptions. The way those raiders see it, there is no room for doing anything less.
Take combat potions, for example. You can cheese potions by taking one before combat begins, getting partial benefit from its duration, and then drinking another one later. You're only supposed to get one potion per combat, but by gaming the system, you can get one and a half. Does it make a massive difference? No. Can you beat bosses without doing it? Yes. Do high-end raiders see that minor difference it does make and thus make the action mandatory despite its monetary cost? Yes.
Is the Raid Finder mandatory for high-end guilds? Yes, but only because they decide it is so. If they didn't do it, they would still be killing bosses. That culture is one of the things that sapped my love of raiding over the years. Going back to Kitsuno's question, being able to avoid that culture of everything is mandatory and simply have fun seeing bosses die is one of the reasons I'm in love with the Raid Finder right now.
Filed under: Analysis / Opinion, The Queue






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 9)
Scotepi Dec 12th 2011 11:02AM
Q4tQ: Any chance on getting a Google Currents feed of the site for iOS/Android? or is that gonna be like comments and 'soon' for years and years?
MattKrotzer Dec 12th 2011 11:18AM
I think they're waiting for all the G+ stuff to not suck, then investigate implementation.
And yeah... we need a new comments system way more urgently than all that stuff.
Scotepi Dec 12th 2011 11:23AM
G+ not to suck? I use it every day, the only thing that sucks about it is there is no way to automatically post via feeds, api or whatever method you want.
As far as a comment system would it really be that hard to implement say disqus?
Alex Ziebart Dec 12th 2011 11:43AM
We SHOULD have a new comment system being implemented ... um, well, I won't give a timeframe. Because we have been saying soon for about three years now. But I know we have a system chosen waiting to be implemented.
Unfortunately, it isn't as simple as plug-and-play with these things. If this was just a personal Wordpress blog that I ran and hosted on my own, we'd be using Disqus in an instant. Of course, if this was just a personal Wordpress blog that I ran and hosted on my own, I couldn't afford a staff of 30 producing 12+ quality articles every single day of the year, so... ups and downs.
We're a big company with a lot of different blogs under our umbrella. We don't get to just click the install button on Disqus and go. We need to either develop a comment system that'll work for us, or find a good one, license it, and make it fit across all of our sites (us, Joystiq, Engadget, etc.) It's a slow process, especially when it gets bumped down the priority list in favor of ensuring our flagship sites like Engadget and Joystiq continue to look nice and clean (and modern.) Joystiq, Engadget and Massively look super slick right now. WoW Insider is probably going to get an appearance closer to Joystiq's at some point.
Then we'll get a comment system.
Soon.
Lou Gagliardi Dec 12th 2011 11:44AM
I was thinking the same thing.
Pyromelter Dec 12th 2011 12:00PM
WI is going to look like Joystiq? Ugh, no, just no. It's so generic and vanilla. You guys have kept a really nice aesthetic to wow insider over the years, and I would hate to lose that look.
The only thing that most of us want is a comment system that is more accurate in terms of being able to respond to the people we want to respond to. If you guys want to throw in some basic text formatting options, an easier way to change our avatar icons, the ability to see more than 20 posts a page, and a personal pet peeve of mine, being able to jump right to the comments on articles that have 2 pages or more, we would all welcome those changes.
But I would implore the powers that be here to not change the overall design of the site itself. The dark background just feels right, the drop-down menus at the top make navigating to the specific columns a breeze, the calendar on the right is always a nice reminder as to what holidays and battleground weekends are coming up. I'd be disappointed if you guys actually took the more vanilla look of joystiq and implemented it here - just the comment system, please!
thebl4ckd0g Dec 12th 2011 12:19PM
please please please whatever you do, do NOT make it look like the main joystiq site or other sites that did a recent revamp (kotaku, gizmodo, engadget, etc.). They all look cookie cutter nowadays. :(
Alex Ziebart Dec 12th 2011 12:22PM
Speaking as a guy that needs to struggle with this site layout from the back-end and spends half of his day frustrated by how archaic the whole thing is ... we cannot kill our current layout soon enough.
The Joystiq and Massively layout didn't sit right with me at first, but now that I've been using it for awhile I'm in love with it. It's just so ... clean!
The calendar widgets and all of that wouldn't need to go away. All of that stuff on the right-hand side would be customizable by us. The major difference is on our site it looks like a bunch of messy clutter (and being the one updating it is a frustrating task.) On Joystiq it looks shiny and works better.
Alex Ziebart Dec 12th 2011 12:32PM
Oh, and we currently have no plans to do anything with Google Currents. Maybe in the future, but not right now.
Shadowwind Dec 12th 2011 12:45PM
Just went to Joystiq to take a look, and I'm not really a fan. Oh well. I can definitely understand the 'mess of cables behind the scene' idea, though, so if it helps you guys out... Don't suppose it really helps that your comment is coming on the heels of Wowhead completely frelling over their comment system. /tear
Nina Katarina Dec 12th 2011 1:06PM
Things I don't like about joystiq that I hope you can avoid doing at WowInsider
- the header image is so huge that it pushes your top story off of the screen for me. I have to scroll down to see if there's anything new.
- too bright. I like your black background here, makes the articles pop out more.
- no good visual breaks between articles, again, the black background would work wonders there.
ZodiacDragons Dec 12th 2011 1:23PM
I think the biggest issue I have is not bveing able to Edit or Delete posts. I've only been to Joystiq and Massivly once to try and change my avatar* and while I didnt think it looked as cool as WoW Insider, I won't fret if ya'll change to that. It's not like I'm going to stop coming here if you do.
*HOW THE HELL DO I CHANGE THIS THING? Whenever I click my name on Joystiq/Massively, nothing comes up. When I click the Change Picture button here, nothing happens. I tried putting cheap little comments on Joystiq and Massivly, but instead of my name on the posts, it says Unverified.
Greg Dec 12th 2011 1:56PM
The main things I like about wowinsider (aside from the articles themselves) are:
1. The aesthetic. I like the scrols over space look you've got going. Bright colors hurt my eyes. If you change it, I'd honestly probably stop visiting.
2. The community. I enjoy seeing posts from the same people and watching them get up (and sometimes down) rated. I don't know if changing the whole feel of the site would adversely affect the community, but my guess is- yes.
The main things I dislike about wowinsder are:
1. No avatar changing ability- very little in the way of individual account management in general
2. No way to go straight to comments in multi-page articles
I think aside from those items, I'm pretty happy with wowinsider most of the time. If you all do decide to make changes, please don't go too far.
Deathknighty Dec 12th 2011 2:09PM
Please, please, PLEASE keep the aesthetic you've got going on here. I rarely go on Joystiq, primarily because the site is so damn ugly! The comments are all the same sterile white colour meaning rubbish posts aren't properly dimmed and excellent ones aren't properly highlighted, and the same whiteness is also found on everything else on the website. It's all white and orange and hard edges and looks godawful. It's fine if you move around some of the layout, but changing the colour scheme or general aesthetic, especially if you were to then imitate Joystiq, would be an absolutely terrible idea.
When people beg for a new comment system, all they really want is the current one with added edit/delete button, and things like that. In fact, the only problems I can think of with the current one is that you can't edit or delete posts so double posts and "oops typo" posts are somewhat numerous. That's literally the only fault I can find with the current one. Don't go out of your way to change it in ways that are totally unnecessary.
Hurbster Dec 12th 2011 2:31PM
Please keep the dark background. I can't use Joystiq any more as the background is too bright and hurts my eyes. I also have to really limit my time on Massively for the same reason. We don't all read this site in a bright office. The bright background totally ruined those sites for me.
And the massively comments are still rubbish.
Pyromelter Dec 12th 2011 2:31PM
Alex, clean isn't always preferred. Clean works for me when I'm using google, and I want to search for something quickly and have it be readily apparent. But sometimes I want Yahoo, I want lots of stuff going on to give me options on where to websurf next.
Wouldn't there be some way to keep the darker look and dropdown menus of the current site? I'm not a huge programmer, but I've dabbled in some html in the past, it wouldn't seem like it would be that difficult to keep the look similar but have the foundations of the site be much more sturdy on that back end.
The white look of Joystiq is just so... bland and sterile. WI is more for entertainment than just information. If I wanted just info, I'd go hit up the very cleanly organized elitist jerks class threads. But I largely prefer the fun and banter of Christian Belt, Allison Robert, Matthew Rossi, and all of the rest of the excellent bloggers you guys have, which is why I spend much more time surfing here than there.
I guess I'm just saying don't fall in love with "clean." Clean can also mean sterile... so I say, "Don't sterilize me bro!"
loop_not_defined Dec 12th 2011 3:07PM
I prefer no Edit/Delete buttons, tbh. Editing/deleting (outside of software borks) just seems to promote dishonesty among forums. I really do fear that such functions reduce the quality of communities. "No take-backsies" as they say.
I don't think people would be so up in arms about it if the current comment system actually worked and didn't frequently eat comments or throw them elsewhere like darts on a board. Also, this community has gotten over typos and whatnot (for the most part), so I don't really see that as a problem.
Nathanyel Dec 12th 2011 3:33PM
Regarding editing, I often see systems use a time-limited ability to edit finished posts, e.g. 15 minutes after submission, you can freely edit and delete, afterwards, it's static.
HappyFunBall Dec 12th 2011 4:14PM
*Please* don't change WoW Insider to look like Joystiq. For whatever reason, the article text on Joystiq is unreadable to me. It's blurry and very hard to focus on. Turns into a grey-ish color instead of pure black, and grey on white is very hard on the eyes to read.
I'm not sure what they did with their text/font styles, but it's horrendous to me, and I have to avoid it. I'd hate for this site to end up on my "can't read" list.
Chrior Dec 12th 2011 11:08AM
Well said, Mr. Alex, well said indeed. LFR is surely an amazing tool these days!