Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-16-2011 @ 8:10AM
anuillae said...
They've got to do SOMETHING. I mean, the whole time thing is all well and good at the moment (hahaha), but when MoP comes out, it's going to be terrible. For a new pandaren, you'll have to start off in the present, then go back to post-Cata vanilla world, then make a huge jump back to Outland, then come forward a little bit to Northrend, then forward again to Cataclysm (again), and then forward again to the present.
They can't keep going like this, srsly.
Reply
12-16-2011 @ 8:50AM
Noyou said...
I think the story part of it could use a facelift. Thinking about it, when they updated blasted lands they had a good opportunity to do so. The only reservation I have, is how much would it set new content back. Considering the amount of time people spend in outland now, I have to think It is a low priority. Now, seeing as how they might like the 5 levels of new content model, perhaps 90-95 will come with a "back to the outland" revamp.
12-16-2011 @ 9:20AM
Kakume said...
I'm seeing this a lot about the Pandaren starting zone, and I don't think the assumption that the Pandarens start in the present is necessarily true. The starting zone is entirely separate from the 85-90 continent of Pandaria. It could easily be contemporary with, say, the Goblin and Worgen starting zones.
12-16-2011 @ 6:41PM
Andres said...
You know, I hadn't thought about it that way, noyou, but if they're only giving us 5 levels again they had dang well better include an update to Outland and/or Northrend. Part of their justification for Cata's relatively minimal content was "But we spent SO MUCH TIME AND EFFORT revamping the Old World!" Now they will have no such excuse.