Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-20-2011 @ 11:20AM
Nina Katarina said...
They took 5 shaman and 0 warriors on their kill, although we can't be positive which specs the shammies were in. Still, that's a huge change from Paragon's "shaman are terrible" stance not so long ago.
Reply
12-20-2011 @ 11:22AM
Shinae said...
Shaman powah!
12-20-2011 @ 11:33AM
The Dewd said...
THERE IS ONLY POW'R!
12-20-2011 @ 2:29PM
Talsenar said...
To be fair, all three specs of Shamans have received buffs since paragon made that statement, especially Enhancement and their AOE finally letting them be competitive.
12-20-2011 @ 5:51PM
Spellotape said...
They never said shamans were terrible - they just had other classes doing the same thing more efficiently and/or better.
This entire article is being bogged down in misinformation.
12-20-2011 @ 6:58PM
valadarium said...
Actually, during a live raid, I believe it was the week after the world second, member of Paragon was commenting on the raid with an outside commentator, and was specifically asked about shamans and their world first Ragnaros kill. The Paragon member said they were horrible, though he never gave out his reasoning. So yeah, Paragon, or at least one of it's members, has said that.