Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-30-2011 @ 12:50AM
Skarn said...
@Eyhk,
I thought it was pretty cruel at the time actually. It was neat, but also lame. A cool idea to no longer need ammo, but it had zero combat benefit (unless you tended to run out of ammo). Compared to the very recent Warglaives with their bonus that was so awesome it was practically required to have at least one set in raid in order to kill Brutallus to even TRY to kill Kil'jaeden.
Even beyond that, the moment you equipped the bow you KNEW that it was temporary. That the sweet, sweet glory of no-ammo was going to leave you in Wrath. It mocked us from the very start. Awesome that they finally changed it for Cata, but it was a cruel, cruel joke to have it on the legendary bow.
Without a doubt, Thori'dal was the lamest legendary of them all. Many suffered from some of the same issues, but Thori'dal had EVERY issue. Blarg. I'm not sure if we're better off than Feral druids or not. We technically had a legendary, it looked awesome and I'll admit I still want it so I can stick it in my bank, but it was so very lame.