World of Warcraft no longer compatible with Windows 2000 in Mists of Pandaria

One of the big benefits to playing World of Warcraft has always been that it can be played on a variety of systems, from the exceptionally small and outdated to the current, top-of-the-line models. I always found that a fascinating phenomenon, and it made good sense -- after all, if you want the max number of players able to play your game, you want to make it available with the widest software and technology possible. Yet there's a drawback to this; if you want to continually make that content available for older systems, there's only so far you can go updating content.
As a game that just celebrated its seven-year anniversary, WoW absolutely needs to keep updating in order to remain competitive. With new MMOs coming out all the time, a game that is seven years old starts to lose its shine. Continuous updates make sure that it stays just as fresh as it did in 2004. You can't keep those updates rolling if you're trying to support an operating system that is now 12 years old. I think, however, we're safely in the territory where most people have moved beyond Windows 2000, so this shouldn't affect a huge majority of players, particularly when Microsoft itself has already phased out support for the operating system. What this does do, however, is make me look forward to Mists of Pandaria and what it has in store.
In preparation for the upcoming release of Mists of Pandaria, updates to World of Warcraft will no longer support Microsoft Windows 2000. Microsoft ceased support for this version of their operating system in 2010. Players still using Windows 2000 are encouraged to upgrade prior to the release of Mists of Pandaria.
World of Warcraft: Mists of Pandaria is the next expansion, raising the level cap to 90, introducing a brand new talent system, and bringing forth the long-lost pandaren race to both Horde and Alliance. Check out the trailer and follow us for all the latest MoP news!
Filed under: News items, Hardware, Mists of Pandaria






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
Imnick Jan 9th 2012 8:03PM
For a moment I found myself thinking "Huh, what year was Windows 2000 released"
):
CeilLothar Jan 9th 2012 8:56PM
You are NOT alone ... DOH! >
rodarvus Jan 10th 2012 10:36AM
The answer is not the obvious one, though.
Windows 2000 was released to manufacturing in December 1999 (i.e., OEM purchases were already possible back then)
The retail version was indeed released in early 2000.
Imnick Jan 10th 2012 11:05AM
I'm not a manufacturer
Matthew Jan 9th 2012 8:05PM
I'm waiting for WoW to run on my Apple IIe. It's enhanced with 128k!
StClair Jan 11th 2012 12:27PM
You laugh, but I have a ][+ in my closet. Monitor and disk drive too. If I set it up, it'd run just fine - which is more than I can say for Steve Jobs these days. :(
Amaxe Jan 9th 2012 8:11PM
Hmm, and what recent game was derided for not being playable on older OS?
/ducks
It's bound to happen I think for any long lived games. Either adapt or be left behind. Heck, I can remember the reverse situation when Freedom Force wouldn't play on Vista (though thankfully it can with Steam).
Blizz can either eventually squeeze out older OS or be forced to stagnate to accommodate them. Sucks for those still with Win2000 yes, but probably not a lot of choice for Blizz.
I feel old though... I remember when everyone said XP sucked and 2000 was the best OS.
Pyromelter Jan 9th 2012 8:25PM
XP never "sucked" but it wasn't that great until service pack 2. When SP2 hit XP, it was immediately vaulted as the best Windows OS that ever existed - not that that was that great of an accomplishment, but XP SP2 can legitimately be described as a solid operating system, without being snarky or scarcastic about "windblows."
Windows 2000 was solid and stable, but it was designed more for server and business applications. It wasn't until XP that windows really had something to offer for both stability and general user-friendly openness, especially with connecting to networks and the internet. I remember a lot of games and programs not working on windows 2000 that were able to be used on windows XP, or at least companies supporting XP and skipping over windows 2000.
Magius Jan 9th 2012 8:52PM
Oh people did say Windows XP sucked. It was often referred as bloated, slow, and even a scheme to force people to upgrade from older hardware. A lot people insisted that Win95 was a better OS. It's true however that it got better with time and with newer hardware.
Lo and behold, it's 2012 Win7 has been out for a while and there are still people holding on to legacy OSes screaming at the top of their lungs exactly the same things.
And you know what? In the future, when Win999 becomes a reality, people will be holding onto Win998 like their lives depended on it and scream how much better it is than that bloated telepathic interface MS is forcing people onto with the new OS.
Amaxe Jan 9th 2012 8:58PM
Yeah, I think the only major OS I can recall that nobody seems to like is Vista... or at least I don't recall people complaining about 7 being forced on them.
Ah well, you get used to it.
Pyromelter Jan 9th 2012 9:14PM
Amaxe, this might be selective amnesia bby you but windows ME was about the worst piece of garbage ever.
brighthammer Jan 9th 2012 9:21PM
I really don't think many still use windows 2000. But I wonder when wow will stop running with xp? It is an old one, but I like using it and won't upgrade till I get a new comp.
Jere Hunter Jan 9th 2012 9:41PM
Yeah, I feel old too. The funny thing is I thot that they said that around WotLK, which upset me because W2K was very stable and I seldom had a crash, but when I *ahem* upgraded to XP cause I thot I read that WotLK wasnt going to support W2K and got XP, it crashed every other day, then once a week, then once a month. Yeah, it slowed down the crashes but was very frustrating :(. That being said, I love Windows 7
SamLowry Jan 9th 2012 10:40PM
Pyro, though I never ran ME, Vista did kill my primary computer. I gave up on it months ago when it got stuck in the dreaded startup loop, and at this point I'd rather save my pennies to buy a new computer than take it in and have a technician fix it.
Pyromelter Jan 10th 2012 1:11AM
Sam, I had the misfortune of dealing with vista for a bit, and yeah, it is an overbloated piece of garbage. But Windows ME makes that vista look like a field of diamonds and rubies by comparison... it was that bad.
Rebornbendar Jan 10th 2012 1:33AM
Windows ME /shudder
Mycroft Jan 10th 2012 1:41AM
Yeah, Windows XP was pretty good, once you got hardware (and thus drivers) that was made for it, instead of trying to shoehorn it on hardware that's not optimal.
Windows Me was terrible. I advised people to downgrade to 98 (or not 'upgrade') if they had an older PC, or to upgrade to 2000 if they had a newer PC.
I don't think the drop of support for 2000 will be too bad. It can't be age, as any PC that can run WoW today can easily run XP. Since even that isn't sold anymore, techies who are holding on to 2k also have (unofficially) many Linux options available.
There's still the concern of pseudo-DRM contained in windows XP and later. If the os thinks for any reason you're not a legitimate user, it can lock you out and disable your PC. Some don't like the idea of that, and I can't say I blame them.
RetPallyJil Jan 9th 2012 8:12PM
Blizzard does its best to be inclusive for all users. I can't think of another company that even comes close.
Windows 2000 is a twelve-year old operating system. It's acceptable to phase it out, I'd say.
Snuzzle Jan 10th 2012 11:24AM
Let's also not forget that every once in a while, when you log in, it says you're "submitting non personal system information" or something like that. I'd bet they have actual hard numbers of how many players are using Win2k and it's probably low enough that this will benefit them more than it hurts.
Pyromelter Jan 9th 2012 8:15PM
I would have hoped that everyone who is on windows is at least up to windows XP. And as a life-long windows user (not a lover, but rather a user), I can vouch for windows 7 as being a solid operating system, if you were considering updating to the most recent OS.
But I would say at this point, anyone on a PC using anything other than Windows XP or Windows 7 should immediately switch over to one of those 2 operating systems, otherwise you are really asking for trouble (either security-wise, or with general instability).
BTW mac people, I still love you, the above message was for those people who by preference or force are using non-mac computers.