Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
1-23-2012 @ 6:42PM
Piper said...
1) All you are doing is shuffling the drama around. If legendaries become guild-bound start watching for the guild kicks so that a new favorite gets the item. It would also tip the guild recruitment abilities even further away from newer and/or lower level guilds.
2) Good idea
3) Great for those that did the quest chain, meh for everyone else. Given Blizzard has stated they want people out of the cities and into the world I don't see it happening anytime soon.
4) & 5) Agreed
6) No. It's been a hard enough fight for 10 mans to be considered equal that I don't want to lose that. If you raid 25 man do it because you like the raid size, not because you get extra virtual pixels. Otherwise too many guilds will kill themselves trying to be 'real' size raiding guild. :sigh:
7) Agreed, but most tabard designs will still be ugly since most of us (myself included) can't design a good looking tabard.
My wish would be that rep would just be Guild Rep. That way if you end up changing guilds - for whatever reason - you don't need to regrind guild rep. Helping new guilds grow and thrive is better for the game in the long run.
Reply