What makes a bad word bad?

Warning: This post may contain language that is offensive to some.
Our own Fox Van Allen tackled the subject of the odd quirks of the mature language filter last week -- the fact that some objectionable words have been mysteriously left out of the filter, while others of a much less objectionable nature have oddly been left in it. None of this was noticed of course until the mature language filter was bugged so that it reset itself, resulting in a lot of people spewing a lot of random keyboard symbols until they remembered to turn it off again.
Personally? I'm not sure if the mature language filter is at all an effective tool. Since the first days of WoW, Horde and Alliance players have not been allowed to speak to each other. Part of this was because of faction separation, but part of it was to discouraging griefing, which happened all the time in PvP situations. Players of the opposing faction could kill you repeatedly, but they couldn't swear at you -- until, that is, players realized they could communicate with keyboard symbols arranged into letters. This ability was soon squashed.
And that's the problem, isn't it? It doesn't matter how much you block a word. If someone is determined to have their say, they will find a way to say it. If you can't talk to the opposing faction, you roll an alt and cuss them out that way, or over voice chat, or via email, or on Twitter, or wherever they can conveniently contact you. So why try blocking it at all? More importantly, what makes a bad word "bad," anyway?
Our own Fox Van Allen tackled the subject of the odd quirks of the mature language filter last week -- the fact that some objectionable words have been mysteriously left out of the filter, while others of a much less objectionable nature have oddly been left in it. None of this was noticed of course until the mature language filter was bugged so that it reset itself, resulting in a lot of people spewing a lot of random keyboard symbols until they remembered to turn it off again.
Personally? I'm not sure if the mature language filter is at all an effective tool. Since the first days of WoW, Horde and Alliance players have not been allowed to speak to each other. Part of this was because of faction separation, but part of it was to discouraging griefing, which happened all the time in PvP situations. Players of the opposing faction could kill you repeatedly, but they couldn't swear at you -- until, that is, players realized they could communicate with keyboard symbols arranged into letters. This ability was soon squashed.
And that's the problem, isn't it? It doesn't matter how much you block a word. If someone is determined to have their say, they will find a way to say it. If you can't talk to the opposing faction, you roll an alt and cuss them out that way, or over voice chat, or via email, or on Twitter, or wherever they can conveniently contact you. So why try blocking it at all? More importantly, what makes a bad word "bad," anyway?

Apple Cider Mage had an interesting post earlier this week about objectionable terminology of a different kind -- the sexist kind. She takes a look at the disparity between male and female armor, but more importantly, she addresses the term "slut plate," used to describe scanty plate bikinis and other fabulously nonexistent protection from the wrathful elements of the Warcraft world. It's not the armor she's concerned with -- after all, scantily clad women warriors are pretty much commonplace in the fantasy genre. It's the term "slut" that is bothersome, and she does an excellent job of explaining why, even suggesting an alternative term to use.
All of this got me thinking back to Fox's article earlier this week and about words in general. Maybe it's just because I do a lot of writing, or maybe my brain just works in different ways. But to me, words are very odd, powerful little things. Here, we have a random collection of lines we call letters, placed in a certain order, given a certain pronunciation, and then given a collective meaning. All of that out of a little collection of lines.
But those meanings change over the course of years, and a word that meant a bundle of sticks at one point in the distant past now means something entirely different and particularly objectionable to the majority of the public. When did that happen, exactly? How did people take a word with one meaning and give it another -- and more importantly, why did we let it grow and fester into a word that we are now ultimately offended by?
There are words in the English language that I will not use, which is why this post has not been peppered with terms that I don't feel comfortable laying out there for you to read. But as I think about it, I wonder why I am so uncomfortable with saying them, writing them, or even thinking them. They're words. Little collections of lines, put together in a certain way and given a particular meaning -- and apparently that meaning is strong enough that I don't want to even place those words to paper or say them aloud.

Gamers and other people who use offensive language don't particularly care about that meaning in one way or another. What they care about is how people react to the meaning and the words. What they are doing is deliberately throwing a lot of of those collections of lines at people and taking delight when people get upset and take offense because of that meaning. It's a power play, and there are far too many people out there who buy into it on a continual basis.
In short, it's not the words that are harmful; they're collections of lines. Placed in order, and given meaning. The person who gives those words meaning is the person who holds all the power over those words, not the person who is saying them. The person who is saying them is hoping beyond all hope that the ones who are listening are going to give those words the worst meaning possible and have some sort of negative reaction to it.
Maybe telling a person to stop using those words isn't enough. Maybe trying to block that person from saying those words isn't enough. The only thing making a bad word bad is the meaning we attribute to it. Human beings have been around for thousands of years, and in those thousands of years, we've decided that some words are bad and others are good. And over the course of history, we've taken perfectly good words and collectively decided to change the meaning of those perfectly good words into something that is considered bad and wholly reprehensible.
If we have the power to change the meaning of a word from positive to negative, why do we seem to lack the power to stop it from changing at all?
Filed under: Analysis / Opinion
Patch 5.3 interview with Ghostcrawler
Mystery of the Unborn Val'kyr
The latest patch 5.3 news
All of the latest Mists of Pandaria news





Reader Comments (Page 4 of 7)
Pyromelter Feb 1st 2012 2:51PM
Dwarves, traditionally, will insult their enemies.
"I spit upon your grave"
"Go kiss an orc"
"A plague upon the stiff neck of elves"
-all possible translations for Gimili's Dwarven language insult of Haldir in the Fellowship of the Rings movie.
These insults in middle earth would be akin to "Go f*** yourself" or "Die you wimpy d***head/d*****bag."
Also, if you ever watched Firefly, they cursed, and I mean cursed cursed, ALL the time... they just did it in Chinese so it was never bleeped on American television. Okay they're not dwarves, but one would expect swashbuckling adventurers to use colorful language, especially if they are from a colorful race like a dwarf. The only exceptions I could possibly think of are paladins and priests, who might in an RP take a vow to not swear.
clundgren Feb 1st 2012 2:35PM
We discovered in guild chat that "tampon" is considered offensive by the language filter, which led a number of the women in guild to go on a lengthy and hilarious tirade involving various reproductive terms.
Snuzzle Feb 1st 2012 3:02PM
Really Blizz? TAMPON? Wow.
emberdione Feb 1st 2012 4:34PM
Moonbane?
Seriously this exact thing happened in our guild too. It was like, wth Blizz? When did this become a filterable word?
Caz Feb 1st 2012 2:37PM
"There are words in the English language that I will not use, which is why this post has not been peppered with terms that I don't feel comfortable laying out there for you to read. But as I think about it, I wonder why I am so uncomfortable with saying them, writing them, or even thinking them."
This is simple, for me anyway. There are a lot of words that I could choose to be offended by, but I don't let them offend me. Some people aren't as thick skinned. Some people don't know how to brush it off. It is for them that I don't use these words. It boils down to empathy - I don't want to be hurt, and I don't want to be the source of someone else's hurt, because I know how it feels to be degraded. Even though the receiver of these words is the one truly responsible for the power they carry, perhaps they don't realize it or know how to overcome it.
Maybe your reluctance is due to empathy as well.
People rant about their freedom of expression, or political correctness getting in the way of their ability to offend, but just being a nice person isn't so bad. It will get you much further in life than the guy who spews toxicity and blame wherever he goes.
Noyou Feb 1st 2012 2:54PM
See, to me, I think that is a deluded and desensitized way to look at things. Basically, the victim is at fault. I think that is total bullshit. To treat people with respect you must have a sense of respect for yourself.
Caz Feb 1st 2012 2:57PM
Noyou, I think your reading comprehension skills might be lacking.
By not being offended by slurs, I am respecting myself.
By not perpetuating slurs, I am respecting others.
Where did I say the victim is at fault?
Pyromelter Feb 1st 2012 3:04PM
Have to agree with Caz. Also, just because a person isn't offended by certain words, doesn't mean that person is going to mouth off tons of offensive words every day to everyone he meets. You can still respect that other people might be offended, and use a different word for a crappy situation rather than one that resembles a bundle of sticks.
Noyou Feb 1st 2012 3:09PM
@Caz
That's fine. I respectfully chose not to get into a flame war with you. I am not going to insult you education level. Everyone comprehends and processes things different. Fact of life.
Adam Feb 1st 2012 3:14PM
One of my previous supervisors told me something once that has stuck with me ever since. I used to make calls to people who were delinquent with loan payments, I would just basically remind them how much is due, when it's due, and try to find out if they'd be paying anytime soon.
I got so much hate directed at me by customers, it hurt. I hated doing it.
Anyway, my supervisor looked me in the eye and said, "That is their anger, and you don't own it."
I've since used that every day of my life.
I don't own their thoughts or feelings, I don't own their anger or hatered. I choose not to.
Noyou Feb 1st 2012 3:19PM
"Even though the receiver of these words is the one truly responsible for the power they carry"
In my world, that is saying the object of an insult is responsible for determining whether something is offensive or not. That to me is saying, the victim is responsible for the crime.
If a parent tells their child, "you stupid piece of shit" or a spouse calls their better half, "A no good worthless whore"- those are just words that they should "brush off" or have a "thicker skin"?
Caz Feb 1st 2012 3:53PM
@ Noyou
I see your point, but I think we're talking about two very different things. Insulting someone by calling them a stupid piece of shit is just mean-spirited. Mean people suck.
I'm gay - and you can call me a faggot all you want - I don't have to get upset about it, and in fact I don't. That's what i'm talking about when I said to let it slide off. The person being called names ether chooses to let insults bother them, or they choose to stand proud and say "So what?" The power is not with the person calling me names, nor is the power in the word. It's thier problem, not mine. The power is mine. I choose my fate, I choose my emotions, and I choose my reactions to slurs based in ignorance, biggotry and fear.
John Feb 1st 2012 2:43PM
"raingod Feb 1st 2012 2:19PM
And being an offensive dbag with no thought to anyone but yourself is also a choice. "
A choice you appear to have embraced wholeheartedly.
raingod Feb 1st 2012 2:57PM
Glad to join you in that.
Adam Feb 1st 2012 3:31PM
How was John stooping to your level and joining you? He was merry pointing to the fact that you had to resort to name-calling to get your point across, a thing which he did not.
raingod Feb 1st 2012 6:30PM
@Adam - And how can you not comprehend sarcasm and condescension?
Wubble69 Feb 1st 2012 2:46PM
Bundle of Sticks!
I'm suprised the comments section was even able to exist after you invoked "the law" in the actual article.
Nice One Anne! :)
verlant Apr 18th 2012 3:30AM
its not the word its the context in which makes it good or bad,
Tfish92 Feb 1st 2012 2:50PM
I dislike the idea of any policy that stops people from saying certain words. I don't care about having an optional mature filter if you have a problem with your kids playing, or something, but I don't like the idea of being able to get banned for any amount of time simply for saying something.
If you want to be a dick you should be able to be a dick. I don't really care if someone calls another person a name in game for whatever reason. Just put that person on ignore if they're offending you. If they get on another character to harass you further after the initial ignore, then that's when a ban could be issued.
The idea that some words are worse than others is just a stupid one. What is the difference between the word "butt", and "ass"? One is worse than the other, but they mean the exact same thing. If they mean the exact same thing, then they should both be bad words.
jfofla Feb 1st 2012 2:51PM
Tell you what,
You go ahead and curse all you want, and I will report you every time you do.