Lichborne: Divining the direction of death knight lore in Pandaria

Let's face it: We had it pretty good in Wrath. Since that expansion was our grand debut, we were everywhere. We had an opening experience where we connected with our origin and found out that our own factions, for obvious reasons, barely trusted us. We were instrumental to the battle in Northrend, doing things other factions wouldn't do, with a clear goal of destroying those who wronged us. We were perfect tragic figures with some robust story and great characters in the form of Thassarian, Crok Scourgebane, and Darion Mograine, among others.
In Cataclysm, things have been, to say the least, a little bit sparser. With Arthas dead, do death knights have a purpose in lore anymore, or are we just around because it'd be sort of silly to remove the class and have everyone reroll? I tend to think death knights are still a pretty interesting and dynamic class, story-wise, and this week, we'll look at where we are at the end of Cataclysm and where our story might go in Mists of Pandaria.
Cataclysm: The age of integration
Death knights, to put it lightly, didn't have a huge part in Cataclysm itself. For the most part, we may be able to assume that most death knights stayed in Northrend to help with containment and cleanup of the last of the Scourge, but of course, we don't see any of that. We have been told that the Ebon Blade, along with the Argent Crusade, is keeping an eye on Sylvanas, but unfortunately, they don't take much direct action as a group.
Luckily, we're not left bereft of any death knight development. Two of the more prominent death knights, Thassarian and Koltira, are now generals in their respective factions' armies and have come to clash at Andorhal. This, at least, implies a certain few things about the status of death knights in Horde and Alliance society.
It is certainly true that death knights were noted as barely trusted in the Wrath era, but in Cataclysm, we see two death knights as generals at the heads of rather important armies at Andorhal in Western Plaguelands, and there's no sign of dissension or distrust in their ranks. While there's always the chance of small pockets of people who still hate the death knights for their ties to the Scourge, the death knights' actions in Northrend seem to have essentially earned us some amount of respect and trust among our faction.
Lich Queen Rising: Death knights vs. Sylvanas
Of course, possibly the biggest story hook for death knights comes at the end of the Andorhal quest line. Thassarian and Koltira, acting in remembrance of their brotherhood as members of the Knights of the Ebon Blade, have been trading truces and peace agreements to allow each other to rest up, fight fresh, and fight fair.
Sylvanas, as one might expect, is having none of that, and captures Koltira in some kind of controlling spell, prompting Thassarian to vow to rescue him. This, of course, brings up quite a few questions. Will Thassarian be joined by others of the Ebon Blade? Will there a split between the Horde and Alliance death knights, in which the question of whether death knights are ultimately more loyal to the Ebon Blade or their own factions is called into question?
This question may be magnified by recently rumblings in lore. The Sylvanas short story painted the Dark Lady in a somewhat unflattering light, making her arrogant and vain in life and death alike, using her Forsaken allies as shields between herself and death, tools rather than beloved subjects. Then, of course, there is her willing and eager use of the plague in places such as Gilneas and Southshore. Just about everyone is starting to find reasons to take her out.
At the same time, we've been told that the Alliance is getting some love in Pandaria. The idea of taking out an opposing faction leader may seem a bit high, but hey, we took out both Fandral and Benedictus in Cataclysm, so taking down Sylvanas might not be as far-fetched if you think. If it does go down that way, The Knights of the Ebon Blade would be in a prime situation to take part, being experienced with the type of Lich King shenanigans going on, and with the extra incentive of rescuing Koltira. It would also prove that death knights, even after the death of Arthas, do have something to contribute to the world.
Of course, that's all back on the old world, and it's certainly still possible that Blizzard won't allow us to kill a character as popular as Sylvanas or that the Ebon Blade won't be directly involved. Luckily, there are still a few very interesting hooks Blizzard could use on Pandaria itself.
Sha, suffering, and the death knight
If there's a central villain to the lore of Pandaria so far, it's probably the Sha, a type of malevolent force that feeds off of negative energy. Think about that in relation to death knights for just a moment. Remember, lore-wise, death knights are required to cause pain and suffering in order to stay alive and sane. In other words, what feeds the Sha also feeds the death knights.
So what happens when death knights come to Pandaria en masse to help their factions? Will we have to face up to our very nature? Will our presence bolster the Sha even further? Or will our connection to the Sha's source of power allow us an understanding of their nature to such a way that we can harm or harness them in a way no one else can? It's a story hook I think has a lot of potential. It allows the Knights of the Ebon Blade to get a nice storyline update, and it allows a look into the Sha storyline that lends some complexity to the issue and elevates the storyline beyond "negative emotions bad."
The Lich King stirs
One other possibility I feel deserves a mention, even if it's less likely to come up than the other two possible story lines. Bolvar's had a full expansion to get his act together and really start discovering his power. While he's specifically setting himself up as a jailer of the dead rather than the conquering hero, Blizzard's had a theme of power corrupting for quite some time. Like Tal Rasha before him, will Bolvar succumb? Or will he feel some sort of compulsion to reach out and rein in the autonomous Scourge still operating in the Plaguelands -- or even the Valkyr who escaped his jails to serve Sylvanas?
If he does this kind of thing, one of the few organizations he might be able to reach out to with relatively safety is the death knights. As fellow former slaves of Arthas who also carry the burden of his necromantic taint in the back of their mind (the drive to kill in the back of their mind might be considered a lesser version of the Lich King's drive to conquer), it could be incredibly interesting to see the death knights return to their status as knights of the Lich King. They would, however, not function as heralds of destruction, but as fellow jailers, wardens of the dead, using the Lich King's power once again to deal with threats no one else can handle.
It would certainly be a new direction. Sylvanas, Kerrigan, Tal Rasha, Arthas -- Blizzard seems to have a pattern of allowing heroes to fall to corruption, succumbing to their darker natures when tainted by an outside force, even if they started with good intentions or even became corrupted against their will. But so far, death knights have resisted that, as has Bolvar. Perhaps, in joining together, we'll continue to buck that trend, being a force for good, fighting external demons as well as internal ones.
Filed under: Death Knight, (Death Knight) Lichborne






Reader Comments (Page 2 of 3)
strider61287 Feb 15th 2012 10:04AM
In response to worgen breaking pre-established lore, note that the residents of Pyrewood Village *were* human by day, wolf-form by night as well as friendly to the Alliance. And they've been around since vanilla. I believe also a few of the Shadowfang Keep worgen could talk.
Pandaren death knights *would* be terrible, but they're not going to be around, so there's that.
Birdog Feb 14th 2012 11:10PM
Actually, correct me if I'm wrong, but I remember reading that not all death knights are brought back in their proper body. Like a human could be killed and put into a Tauren corpse. If that's the case those "wild animals" could very well have been some sort of Elf or something.
This being said, a player would have to ignore the quest where they say "YOU WERE A (insert race here), NOW GO KILL YOUR BRO, BRO" and say "I was once a Blood Elf, but now I'm an Worgen" if they wanted to play a Worgen Death Knight.
dmberreth Feb 19th 2012 4:10AM
I would just like to point out a tiny thing. Where as every Death Knight technically involved with the starting area WAS risen by Arthas/his minions to attack the Scarlet.. who says you have to follow the strict scripts of game lore every time?
Not all humans are from Stormwind, for example. Perhaps some may be from a nomad gypsy tribe that's lived in Tanaris for generations.
There -are- Death Knights who are still living, though they were mostly in the Cult of the Damned, and were granted those powers through their willing service and acceptance of being corrupted.
While I agree completely that an undead type DK would be 100% against what a Pandaren would be all about, there are always (very small) exceptions to what we see as standard.
The majority of Death Knights are reanimated corpses, no doubt. And truthfully, I've so rarely seen anyone RP a living DK in any way that makes me think "good job!" - and in such, the story behind my own Death Knight is kept under wraps, because people tend to put on blinders to some things like that.
Lore is good - and it should be followed and used to build up our world, stories, and characters. However, living DK's and their ability to function DO exist in Lore - and trying to build said stories and characters without at least attempting to understand the Lore you are involved in is akin to driving manual transmission without knowing how to shift gears: You'll move - but never get up to top speed.
..my "tiny point" grew into wall-o-text. Whoops.
Heii Feb 14th 2012 4:05PM
That last point, of Bolvar becoming the leader of the Ebon Blade with them shifting from Death Knights to Wardens of the Damned.
I'd also be all for a level 80 spell that gives us a port to a phased Icecrown Citadel for Runeforging and such needs.
But that's just me.
Homeschool Feb 14th 2012 4:18PM
The Death Knights (and now the Pandaren) are putting some real strain on the two-faction architecture of the game. As the War continues, these groups are going to find themselves forced to choose between their heritage and their community, in a very stark way. It's one thing to go against each other in a contest or to have a one-on-one run-in out in the world, but what when one side decrees battle against a faction to which you're aligned? If the Horde were to strike out against a Pandaren settlement, or the Alliance against a Death Knight community, how will these in-the-middle characters respond?
While it would be a drastic shift for the game, we may be headed for a many-sided conflict where war becomes a lot more personal, in the form of choice.
Melvyl Feb 14th 2012 4:23PM
I have 2 DKs that I play semi-regularly - a Draenei and a Blood Elf. For the Draenei especially, Wrath was such great storytelling - Cconfronting the Lich King alongside Thassarian atop Naxxanar was a real highlight.
I would love to see the Ebon Blade do something to help Koltira - especially if Darion Mograine were involved.
Edymnion Feb 14th 2012 4:28PM
You know, my first reaction upon seeing this was "No, why should they? No other class gets it's virtues extolled in the main story line like that, why should DKs be the exception."
Then I stopped to think before blindly started typing.
This whole darned expansion has been about Shamans (which is cool, because my goblin shammy was the first time I've leveled one all the way up).
And while I don't particularly care about DKs (sorry, just not a class I like to play), I do want to see where they're taking the "Sylvanus is going crazy" and "Old God sleeping under Lorderan" storylines.
We've already had the devs mention that it wasn't an oversight that nobody ever mentioned what happened to the pieces of Frostmourn after Arthas was killed, and my pet theory is that Sylvanus has the hilt (and thats how she's controlling the Valkyr), so if that storyline goes anywhere, just the name of Frostmourn will pull the Ebon Blade down around her ears in a heartbeat.
Unfortunately, I don't think Mists will get into any of that. Its supposed to be all about the ramped up war between the factions, not internal faction strife. Even if they did, for balance reasons I'd expect to see it focus more on the Alliance this time since this expansion was all about the Horde (like Wrath was all about the Alliance).
byronius_prime Feb 14th 2012 5:11PM
The Val'kyr joined Sylvanas out of their own volition, she didn't force them. And one other thing, why was Wrath more about the Alliance? Just an honest question since I've never seen horde content in Wrath, and always thought the story didn't tilt in the Allies favor or anything.
Hob Feb 14th 2012 6:24PM
@Byronius
I don't think Warth was about *favoring* the Alliance, just that there were more lore elements for the Alliance. Arthas had been a human prince, Dalaran had been a human kingdom, we found out about the origins of the humans and gnomes, and so on.
It would have felt more Horde-oriented if the Lich King turned out to be Ner'Zhul the orc shaman instead of Arthas the human death knight; if the neutral hub city were a troll temple; and if we found out that the tauren had once been Titan constructs.
That's my take on it, anyway.
Daniel Whitcomb Feb 15th 2012 1:02AM
I honestly don't buy that Wrath was all that Alliance biased. Arguably, up until the mid-70s, The Horde had storylines that were just as dynamic, if not more so, from rescuing the Taunka, to Saurfang vs. Garrosh, to destroying the Alliance Navy and helping to create the Blight.
Sure, you get "traditionally Alliance" Dalaran and Paladins, but in both cases, they have been made neutral to the point of chiding the Alliance for defending themselves against the Horde. (Compare that to Thrall, who said multiple Pro-Horde things, killed Alliance soldiers, and threatened to destroy the Alliance completely while ostensibly neutral). Hell, even in Icecrown, the Alliance suffered defeat at the hands of the Horde.
So. Nah. I don't buy it, to be honest.
Killik Feb 15th 2012 7:38AM
Horde beating Alliance in some minor battle hardly counts as a juicy lore element. What the Horde did get, though, was the Wrathgate betrayal. That was a nice big chunk of story and has had lasting repercussions. It's just a shame the expansion storyline kind of petered out for the Horde after level 75.
btw I keep hearing about Thrall killing Alliance trrops / talking smack about the Alliance, after ostensibly going neutral. When was this? Genuine question, as I feel I'm missing some part of the story.
byronius_prime Feb 15th 2012 8:07AM
@Killik
I believe Thrall killing Alliance troops refers to the goblin zone after they shipwreck? After all they end up victim of an Alliance ambush on Thrall's own ship, so I suppose he did beat some soldiers up in that. Now for cursing the alliance, doesn't he do that, in the "fire" portion of his soul, during the Aggra quests? He specifically says he'll "split Varian's throne in two" or something. That did piss me off, as I feel very Alliance biased, but since it was the rage in him speaking, I kind of ignored it, but didn't forget it. I suppose if I were roleplaying, I'd have a problem continuing the quest though, world-ending or not.
Edymnion Feb 15th 2012 8:03PM
All of the really major lore moments were Alliance. As has been said, Arthas was originally human. The hub city was Dalaran, a human city that only grudgingly let the Horde in. The Argent Crusade lead the fight against Arthas, which was an Alliance organization. The one to officially kill Arthas was Tirion, a hero of the Alliance. In the Wrathgate cinematic, it was the Alliance that charged the gate with the Horde coming in later. The Horde *lost control of one of their capitol cities* for a while and had to have the help of the Alliance to take it back. The two biggest lore reveals of the expansion were the origins of the Humans and Gnomes.
Even as Horde, all the major storylines and questgivers in Icecrown were Alliance members (counting the Argent Crusade as being Alliance here). About all the Horde got specifically was a zone dedicated to making the plague that got used on Arthas (which got cancelled out by the fact that was directly responsible for us losing Undercity), and having to suffer through Garrosh being a dick.
Wrath was all about the Alliance wrapping up it's most longstanding storyline, while Cataclysm has been much more about balancing the two sides out (which means the much neglected Horde finally went on the offensive and starting taking some territory).
You guys had Wrath, we had Cataclysm, so I expect MoP to either be much more faction neutral with it's metaplot, or that the pendulum will swing back to letting the Alliance have it's turn again.
Daniel Whitcomb Feb 16th 2012 3:22AM
Again, The Argent Crusade and Dalaran were both neutral and full of Horde NPCs, and in fact, the leaders of both organizations openly chided the Alliance for disliking the Horde on multiple occassions. That is not really Alliance-biased. If anything, it's discouraging to the Alliance because some of the greatest parts of our identity have been stripped away from us. Compare, again, to Thrall, who was "stripped" from the Horde, and yet still managed to kill Alliance players and had multiple inner and outer monologues in which he openly declare his love for the Horde and/or hidden Hatred for the Alliance.
The only way things would really be equal is if, say, Rhonin or Tirion joined us in defeating the Forsaken at Andorhal. That would be about equivalent, I'd say.
I'd also argue that the Saurfang/Garrosh dynamics and the Wrathgate, both of which were major Horde developments, have had far farther-reaching reprecussions than the Human/Dwarf/Gnome reveals, which lead exactly nowhere once Storm Peaks was over as a zone.
Killik Feb 16th 2012 4:33AM
I don't get where Thrall kills Alliance players, genuinely. Are you talking about the elementals, during the 'put Thrall's brain back together' quest line? Because they also kill Horde players FYI.
Natch, Thrall kills Alliance troops in the Goblin starting zone - but since they ambushed and captured him him first, that wouldn't count as breaking neutrality. Also, were they not actually working on the orders of the Twilight cult?
As for 'Elemental Bonds', Thrall says a lot of things in that questline. He also says he wants to kill Garrosh for the death of Cairne. When his actual fondest desires manifest, you can see that one of them is to make peace with Varian.
Killik Feb 16th 2012 4:38AM
I'm not saying they did a great job of selling Thrall as neutral - they didn't. But from what I see, the difficulty arises more from the fact that for five years previously Thrall was the Alliance's #1 most wanted target. Now all of a sudden you're supposed to take orders from him.
Edymnion Feb 16th 2012 8:52AM
Yeah, but come on Hordies, you know him raging about wanting to kill Garrosh was what we were all thinking as well.
Thrall, honey, the Cataclysm is over. The world is safe. Come back home and crack Garrosh's skull open with the Doomhammer and lead the Horde again. Pretty please?
byronius_prime Feb 14th 2012 4:58PM
Excellent article. The last point specifically is just what I want. I've always thought that since the Argent Crusade is an order of Paladins, they are to fight any evil, undead, demons, the works. The Ebon Blade on the other hand, has no goal, or drive after Arthas' death. Unless...
Unless they become jailers as well. I wasn't exactly thinking jailers of the Scourge(Bolvars' power is enough for that) as much as jailers of Bolvar himself. Think about it. They're keeping their eye on Sylvanas due to her Lich Queen thing. Shouldn't they be worried about Bolvar too? Power corrupts, and Bolvar is one of the most powerful individuals in Azeroth right now (thanks to his enormous undead army). Perhaps they could be, what the dreadlords where to Ner'zhul - keeping him in check, so that he does what he's supposed to. Would be awesome if they moved Acherus next to Icecrown, so that they can monitor him better.
It makes sense when we think about the fact that the formerly-known-as Ashen Verdict(Argents+Ebon Blade) will certainly take action against Sylvanas. Both factions certainly don't want another WotLK scale war happening, so I would imagine after dealing with her, they'll set their sights on Northrend again. I'd love it if they would move Acherus next to Icecrown
Broken-toes Feb 14th 2012 5:39PM
I really hope blizz has the courage to go for some of these story elements. Not just for DK's, even though they may get the most satisfaction for following them through.
It seems counter to what blizz has been doing so far though. And while I lack the motivation to back this up, I'm under the impression a good number of players don't take up on the lore so much. Or pay attention to quest text so much. Which allows blizz to act accordingly (makes sense to put resources based on what the player base seems to want).
There are so many things they could have went into, gave us a little finish (mankrick, neptulon, sylvanas just off the top of my head) but instead we get darkmoon, which I bet will have absolutely no more done to it. Nothing will be done to carry on the little teasers it alludes to, apart from maybe a filler raid till MoP drops.
I really hope they push the story more, and don't shy away from classes having more resonance with different chains.
Swotr does story so well, but fails badly on endgame, I would think its only a matter of time before Bioware figures out how to compensate.
Zaet Feb 14th 2012 10:36PM
"This question may be magnified by recently rumblings in lore. The Sylvanas short story painted the Dark Lady in a somewhat unflattering light, making her arrogant and vain in life and death alike, using her Forsaken allies as shields between herself and death, tools rather than beloved subjects. Then, of course, there is her willing and eager use of the plague in places such as Gilneas and Southshore. Just about everyone is starting to find reasons to take her out."
you NEED to read the story again, she was like that, shes not any more