Skip to Content
2-17-2012 @ 4:12PM
I don't think Blizzard has any right to oppose Valve's trademark of DOTA. DOTA is a game that defined a genre, but it is still a game (or a mod of a game, at least) and can be copyrighted like any other game or piece of intellectual property. Valve has the rights to this particular piece of intellectual property because they employ IceFrog. I speculate that Blizzard's opposition to the trademark is for money reasons instead of moral reasons. If their Notice of Opposition goes through and they win, they won't have to pay any royalties to Valve and can pocket every cent of profit Blizzard DOTA makes.
2-17-2012 @ 6:07PM
I sit here wondering: did you even read the article?
First time? A confirmation email will be sent to you after submitting.
Members enter your username and password.
Enter your AOL or AIM screenname and password.
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.